Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Dichotomising the risk of hyperglycaemia into diabetes and prediabetes may render a disservice to patient care

George Siopis, Renza Scibilia and Hosen Kiat
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2022-0544
Clin Med March 2023
George Siopis
ADeakin University, Geelong, Australia
Roles: executive dean health research fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: george.siopis@deakin.edu.au
Renza Scibilia
BJuvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, Melbourne, Australia
Roles: director of community building and communication, global access
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hosen Kiat
CMacquarie University, Sydney, Australia; professor of Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Roles: professor of cardiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for one-third of global mortality. Prediabetes increases the risk of CVDs as well as several other conditions, yet people with prediabetes may not seek intervention, thinking that they do not have diabetes, as the risk of progression may have not been emphasised by the healthcare professional. Accumulating evidence indicates that hyperglycaemia represents a continuum of CVD risk and dichotomising the risk into type 2 diabetes and prediabetes may deter early clinical intervention. It is proffered that the term ‘prediabetes’ is a misnomer that may disguise a serious condition, fostering complacency and undermining its prognostic significance.

KEYWORDS:
  • prediabetes
  • cardiovascular disease
  • risk factor
  • prognosis
  • clinical practice

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for one-third of global mortality with an estimated death toll of 17.9 million people per annum.1 One-third of these deaths occur prematurely in people under 70 years of age, with major modifiable risk factors including unhealthy diet, inadequate physical activity, smoking, and drinking.1 These behaviours may result in hypertension, dyslipidaemia, hyperglycaemia and central adiposity. These modifiable risk factors are often measured in primary care facilities and serve as means to assess the risk of CVDs. During this screening process, people with elevated blood glucose levels (BGLs) are classified to have ‘prediabetes’ if their BGLs are 140–199 mg/dL (7.8–11.0 mmol/L) or ‘diabetes’ if their BGLs are 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or higher.2

It should be noted that the definitions of diabetes and prediabetes based on BGLs are arbitrary, with accumulating evidence suggesting that hyperglycaemia is a metabolic derangement in a continuum. The dichotomy of diabetes and prediabetes does not accurately reflect the risk and may downplay the need for prompt clinical intervention and changes to behaviour. Studies have indicated the increased risk of developing CVDs and heart conditions in people with prediabetes.3 Chronic hyperglycaemia in people with prediabetes is associated with subclinical myocardial damage and is likely to underpin the protectiveness of sodium–glucose cotransporter (SGLT-2) inhibitors such as dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in mitigating risks of heart failure, even among people without diabetes.3,4 A 2020 meta-analysis synthesising 129 studies involving a total of more than 10 million participants reported an association between prediabetes and CVD (odds ratio: 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11–1.18).5 In people with atherosclerotic CVD, this association was even higher at 1.37 (95% CI: 1.23–1.53). When compared with normoglycaemia, the absolute risk difference in prediabetes for CVD was 8.75 (95% CI: 6.41–10.49) per 10,000 person-years in the general population, and 189.77 (95% CI: 117.97–271.84) per 10,000 person-years in people with atherosclerotic CVD.5 In addition to increasing CVD risk, prediabetes increases the risk of all-cause mortality (odds ratio: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.10–1.17).5 Moreover, prediabetes is significantly associated with adverse outcomes of other conditions, such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as recently reported by a meta-analysis including more than 3,000 people (odds ratio: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.46–4.56),6 and increased risk of developing dementia (450 participants, odds ratio: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.04–1.33).7

In Australia, prediabetes affects nearly one in six adults.8 Organisations such as Diabetes Australia advise that while people with prediabetes have a higher risk of developing CVDs, they are not necessarily engaged with healthcare services.9 People in the community and healthcare providers in Australia, such as GPs, endocrinologists, cardiologists and dietitians, have highlighted the missed opportunities for early intervention to prevent diabetes disease progression.10 Type 2 diabetes is characterised by a progressive nature that renders it more challenging and costly to manage at more advanced stages, including the requirement for use of polypharmacy and increased rates of hospitalisation. Prediabetes represents a window of opportunity for intervention where prevention of progression to type 2 diabetes may be possible. Early intervention in people without diabetes with elevated BGLs significantly reduces the odds of progression to type 2 diabetes. There is a clear role for early lifestyle intervention that displays greater effectiveness over pharmacological agents such as metformin. However, most people with prediabetes do not seek intervention.9,10 This lack of urgency from people with elevated BGLs may result partly due to the misnomer ‘prediabetes’, which nulls the person's motivation for the requisite intervention, thinking that they do not have diabetes. It is acknowledged by the International Diabetes Federation that not all people with ‘prediabetes' will develop diabetes, further supporting that this term does not accurately reflect the condition.

Other names that have been used to describe the condition, such as ‘intermediate hyperglycaemia’ and ‘non-diabetic hyperglycaemia’, inherit the same limitations, conveying lack of insight into the pathophysiology of metabolic conditions that exert prognostic effects in continuum. This may contribute to complacency and adversely influence people's participation in health-promoting behaviours. An international consensus on a term that describes the condition appropriately to prompt action is warranted, considering that the global prevalence of prediabetes is growing rapidly. It is estimated that within a decade, half a billion people worldwide will develop this condition and 70% of them will eventually be diagnosed with diabetes. Large meta-analyses have demonstrated that hyperglycaemia in the prediabetes range is not benign, and it is a risk both for communicable and non-communicable diseases. It is therefore suggested that the misnomer ‘prediabetes’ should be replaced by a more appropriate term that adequately reflects and clearly communicates the risk to people. The new term must alert the community about the reasons for taking decisive action to prevent disease progression to diabetes and highlight health improvements. Considering that the term ‘high blood pressure’ has been useful in clinical practice for communicating the message to people more clearly than the term ‘hypertension’, we proffer that clinicians adopt the term ‘high blood sugar’ instead of ‘prediabetes’, to appropriately communicate the real risk to people. Terms such as ‘high blood sugar’ and ‘high blood pressure’ are without judgement. They are statements of facts. Starting to use these terms may facilitate reducing the blame. Finally, to improve the chances of a successful outcome, it is paramount to include the community in such discussions to gain an insight regarding what terminology would best resonate.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2023. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    . Cardiovascular diseases. www.who.int/health-topics/cardiovascular-diseases#tab=tab_1 [Accessed 21 February 2023].
  2. ↵
    1. Mayo Clinic.
    Prediabetes. www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/diabetes/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20371451#:∼:text=A%20fasting%20blood%20sugar%20level%20from%20100%20to%20125%20mg,separate%20tests%2C%20you%20have%20diabetes [Accessed 21 February 2023].
  3. ↵
    1. Rubin J
    , Matsushita K, Ballantyne CM, Hoogeveen R, Coresh J, Selvin E. Chronic hyperglycemia and subclinical myocardial injury. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:484–9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Custodio JS Jr.
    , Duraes AR, Abreu M, Albuquerque Rocha N, Roever L. SGLT2 inhibition and heart failure – current concepts. Heart Fail Rev 2018;23:409–18.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Cai X
    , Zhang Y, Li M, Wu JH, Mail L, Li J, et al. Association between prediabetes and risk of all cause mortality and cardiovascular disease: updated meta-analysis. BMJ 2020;370:m2297.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Heidarpour M
    , Abhari AP, Sadeghpour N, Shafie D, Sarokhani D. Prediabetes and COVID-19 severity, an underestimated risk factor: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2021;15:102307.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Crane PK
    , Walker R, Hubbard RA, Li G, Nathan DM, Zheng H, et al. Glucose levels and risk of dementia. N Engl J Med 2013;369:540–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bell K
    , Shaw JE, Maple-Brown L, Ferris W, Gray S, Murfet G, et al. A position statement on screening and management of prediabetes in adults in primary care in Australia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020;164:108188.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Siopis G
    , Colagiuri S, Allman-Farinelli M. Doctors identify regulatory barriers for their patients with type 2 diabetes to access the nutrition expertise of dietitians. Aust J Prim Health 2021;27:312–8.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Siopis G
    , Colagiuri S, Allman-Farinelli M. People with type 2 diabetes report dietitians, social support, and health literacy facilitate their dietary change. J Nutr Educ Behav 2021;53:43–53.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Dichotomising the risk of hyperglycaemia into diabetes and prediabetes may render a disservice to patient care
George Siopis, Renza Scibilia, Hosen Kiat
Clinical Medicine Mar 2023, 23 (2) 188-189; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0544

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dichotomising the risk of hyperglycaemia into diabetes and prediabetes may render a disservice to patient care
George Siopis, Renza Scibilia, Hosen Kiat
Clinical Medicine Mar 2023, 23 (2) 188-189; DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0544
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • To find fault is easy, to find no-fault is fair
  • A wide vocabulary for person-centred care
  • A virtuous framework for professional reflection
Show more Opinion

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians