Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

The significance of early HIV testing (1)

CM Naftalin and M Poulton
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.9-1-91c
Clin Med February 2009
CM Naftalin
King's College Hospital, London
Roles: ST3 in Genitourinary Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M Poulton
King's College Hospital, London
Roles: Consultant in Genitourinary Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Menezes et al present a salutary lesson of the month regarding the consideration of early HIV testing (Clin Med October 2008 pp 550–1). However the discussion around HIV risk factors is somewhat flawed. In their paper they refer to intimate family members as separate to sexual partners implying that HIV is transmitted by close family contact other than sexual intercourse. This is unlikely, for example once mother to child transmission during pregnancy has been ruled out we do not consider children to be at continued risk from normal day to day intimate contact with their infected parents. There have been isolated cases of transmission between siblings and non-sexual family members, but these are few and far between.1 The authors suggest that the patient was infected during a period of time when she was caring for her sister who, unbeknown to her, was dying of an AIDS-related illness. This would be an unlikely method of HIV transmission. Acquisition of HIV by caring for a family member with the virus, even when not taking any precautions for intimate caring activities, is extremely rare.2,3

In a significant minority of people diagnosed with HIV in the UK it is difficult to ascertain an obvious risk factor.4 It is most likely that a seemingly low-risk sexual partner did, in fact, have a high risk and was HIV positive. By incorrectly classifying this patient's risk for HIV the authors miss the real point about early HIV testing, which is that the decision whether to test should not be based on a history of risk factors but rather on whether the symptoms or condition being investigated could be HIV related. If one constantly asks oneself could this be HIV related and tests patients irrespective of the presence of risk factors (with their consent) then we will start to make some headway in the quest to diagnose HIV infection earlier.

  • © 2009 Royal College of Physicians

Reference

  1. ↵
    French MA, Herring BL, Kaldor JM et al. Intrafamilial transmission of HIV-1 infection from individuals with unrecognized HIV-1 infection. AIDS 2003; 17:1977–81.doi:10.1097/00002030-200309050-00017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Courville M, Caldwell B, Brunell PA. Lack of evidence of transmission of HIV-1 to family contacts of HIV-1 infected children. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1998;37(3)175–8.doi:10.1177/000992289803700303
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Biberfeld G, Bottiger B, Berntorp E et al. Transmission of HIV infection to heterosexual partners but not to household contacts of seropositive haemophiliacs. Scand J Infect Dis 1986;18(6)497–500.doi:10.3109/00365548609021653
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Health Protection Agency. United Kingdom HIV new diagnoses to end of June 2008. London: HPA, 2008.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The significance of early HIV testing (1)
CM Naftalin, M Poulton
Clinical Medicine Feb 2009, 9 (1) 91-92; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-1-91c

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The significance of early HIV testing (1)
CM Naftalin, M Poulton
Clinical Medicine Feb 2009, 9 (1) 91-92; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-1-91c
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • JAK-inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for refractory primary systemic vasculitides
  • Response
  • Functional disorders and chronic pain
Show more Letters to the editor

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians