Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Encephalitis guidelines: a recipe for success?

Rhys H Thomas and Philip EM Smith
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.9-3-210
Clin Med June 2009
Rhys H Thomas
1Wales Epilepsy Research Network, Institute of Life Sciences, Swansea University
2Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff
Roles: Specialty Registrar in Neurology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip EM Smith
2Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff
Roles: Consultant Neurologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: smithpe@cardiff.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Knowledge is of two kinds. We know a subject ourselves, or we know where we can find information on it.

Samuel Johnson (1709–84)1

Clinical governance, evidence-based medicine and guidelines are regarded with suspicion by some clinicians.2 Audit, however, has become embedded in clinical practice, a core activity for junior doctors and obligatory content for medical interviews. Good audits on really important topics still sometimes produce results so painful that changes in clinical practice must follow. In the current issue of Clinical Medicine, an audit of viral encephalitis management in a single centre by Bell and colleagues highlights inconsistencies of practice which, if representative of other units, suggest suboptimal management of a potentially devastating but treatable condition.3

Viral encephalitis is uncommon, a typical district general hospital, for example, may see only one or two cases per year.4 It presents non-specifically with headache, fever, altered consciousness, seizures and behavioural disturbance, a symptom complex with a broad differential diagnosis.5 Children particularly may present atypically. The variable clinical presentation means its diagnosis is often delayed; even the reliable biomarker – polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to herpes simplex virus – may be negative in the first 10 days and positive overall in only 50%.6 When suspected and treated promptly with aciclovir, the mortality of viral encephalitis is massively reduced from 70 to 20%.7 Aciclovir is well tolerated and generally safe (with notable exceptions) and most effective if started within 48 hours. Perhaps the principal reason for delayed diagnosis and treatment of encephalitis is that acute physicians do not consider it sufficiently often or early. When they do, it is still uncommon enough for 90% of those prescribed aciclovir for encephalopathy to have different diagnoses at discharge.3 Such a policy of ‘over-diagnosis and over-reaction’, however, is justified to prevent the devastating neurological sequelae of viral encephalitis.

Cerebrospinal fluid is necessary to diagnose viral encephalitis definitively with PCR, and to exclude bacterial, fungal or paraneoplastic encephalopathies. The need for computed tomography (CT) imaging before diagnostic lumbar puncture (LP) in suspected encephalitis remains surprisingly contentious, with no agreed UK audit standard. The 2001 guidance for LP in adults with meningitis perhaps needs reappraisal as access to CT improves.8 Rapid imaging and specialist interpretation are increasingly available in emergency units to meet rigorous targets for stroke thrombolysis and head injury. Although CT may be normal in early viral encephalitis, brain shift and hydrocephalus (reliably identifiable on CT) must be excluded before LP,6 at least in health systems where such imaging is readily available. Bell et al's audit identified significant CT brain scan abnormalities among 21 patients with suspected encephalitis: three new strokes, two tumours, one subdural haematoma and one subarachnoid haemorrhage.3 Magnetic resonance brain scanning, preferably with diffusion weighting, might identify cerebral changes facilitating an early positive diagnosis of viral encephalitis. However, this modality is impractical in confused and deteriorating patients, especially out of hours; CT scanning remains the current standard emergency imaging modality for suspected viral encephalitis.

Notwithstanding the imaging issue, even LP itself may be performed inconsistently or incompletely. If 6/17 (35%) omit to measure opening pressure and 4/17 (24%) forget to take a contemporaneous blood glucose then valuable data are being lost and the diagnosis delayed or incomplete.4 The skill of LP is a core competency for medical trainees and these audit findings should stimulate a review of their learning.

Despite research advances in viral encephalitis, the monopoly of knowledge seems to be in the wrong heads and the wrong journals. A trawl through emergency medical literature in 2004 found no published description of the need for early aciclovir therapy in viral encephalitis, in marked contrast to widely publicised indications for early antibiotics in bacterial meningitis.10 The baton of early recognition and proactive aciclovir treatment must now be passed to acute physicians and emergency department clinicians: ‘Infrequent occurrences with catastrophic consequences are not best studied through small case series’.9

A simple and auditable guideline is clearly needed. The Infectious Diseases Society of America has only recently published evidence-based clinical guidelines on viral encephalitis7; UK guidelines are currently being developed.5 Evidence-based guidelines inevitably contain areas of uncertainty but this should not prevent their implementation. Pragmatic guidelines evolve as new evidence emerges, as exemplified by the UK Resuscitation Council's excellent advanced life support guidelines.11 Simply writing an evidence-based guideline will not influence practice: the next audit cycle step is to communicate and implement the guideline. A guideline approach to managing acute encephalopathy will not identify every case of viral encephalitis, but is likely to improve the outcome for many. The message of raised awareness must now be disseminated to acute care physicians and the necessary skills for encephalitis diagnosis (especially LP) given renewed teaching focus. Following a cookbook approach to medicine may be unpalatable to some, but for ‘infrequent occurrences with catastrophic consequences’ it may provide the recipe for success.

Competing interests

PS is a member of the UK Encephalitis Guidelines Panel.

  • © 2009 Royal College of Physicians

References

  1. ↵
    1. Boswell J
    . The life of Samuel Johnson, LL.D. Comprehending an account of his studies and numerous works in chronological order, Vol 1. London: Bloomsbury, 1820:418.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    Clinicians for the Restoration of Autonomous Practice (CRAP) Writing Group. Evidence-based medicine: unmasking the ugly truth. BMJ 2002; 325:1496–8.doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7378.1496
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Bell DJ
    , Suckling R, Rothburn MM et al. Management of suspected herpes simplex virus encephalitis in adults in a UK teaching hospital. Clin Med 2009; 9:231–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Kennedy PGE
    . Viral encephalitis. J Neurol 2005; 252:268–72.doi:10.1007/s00415-005-0770-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Solomon T
    , Hart IJ, Beeching NJ. Viral encephalitis: a clinician's guide. Prac Neurol 2007; 7;288–305.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Benson PC
    , Swadron SP. Empiric acyclovir is infrequently initiated in the emergency department to patients ultimately diagnosed with encephalitis. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 47:100–5.doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.07.019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Tunkel AR
    , Glaser CA, Bloch KC et al. The management of encephalitis: Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47:303–27.doi:10.1086/589747
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Whitley RJ
    . Herpes simplex encephalitis: adolescents and adults. Antiviral Res 2006; 71:141–8.doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2006.04.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Hasbun R
    , Abrahams J, Jekel J, Quagliarello VJ. Computed tomography of the head before lumbar puncture in adults with suspected meningitis. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1727–33.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa010399
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Ridsdale L
    , Massey R, Clark L. Preventing neurophobia in medical students, and so future doctors. Pract Neurol 2007; 7:116–23.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Resuscitation Council (UK). Advanced life support, 5th edn. London: Resuscitation Council (UK), 2006.
    1. Greig PR
    , Goroszeniuk D. Role of computed tomography before lumbar puncture: a survey of clinical practice. Postgrad Med J 2006; 82:162–5.doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.041046
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Encephalitis guidelines: a recipe for success?
Rhys H Thomas, Philip EM Smith
Clinical Medicine Jun 2009, 9 (3) 210-211; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-3-210

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Encephalitis guidelines: a recipe for success?
Rhys H Thomas, Philip EM Smith
Clinical Medicine Jun 2009, 9 (3) 210-211; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-3-210
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Competing interests
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The past, the present, and the future: reflecting on ­medical history as we welcome new leaders
  • Regulation needs new legislation to get lighter
  • Targeting limited NHS resources to affect optimal care
Show more Editorials

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians