Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

An urgent access neurovascular clinic: audit of timeliness

Dennis Briley, Chris Durkin and Tom Meagher
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.9-3-236
Clin Med June 2009
Dennis Briley
Departments of Neurology, Medicine for Older People and Radiology, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury
Roles: Consultant Neurologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dennis.briley@buckshosp.nhs.uk
Chris Durkin
Departments of Neurology, Medicine for Older People and Radiology, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury
Roles: Consultant Physician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Meagher
Departments of Neurology, Medicine for Older People and Radiology, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury
Roles: Consultant Radiologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate timeliness of an outpatient urgent access neurovascular clinic in a district general hospital setting through an audit of delay from event to completion of evaluation following transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke. Participants included those referred for evaluation of suspected TIA or minor stroke. The median delay from event to completion was 16 days, with 45% seen within two weeks of symptom onset, and 15% within one week of symptom onset. A weekly TIA clinic is not capable of achieving the National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke recommendation for evaluation within one week of symptoms. This audit supports the National Stroke Strategy recommendation for immediate evaluation of patients presenting with a recent TIA or minor stroke.

Key Words
  • imaging
  • outpatient clinic
  • stroke
  • transient ischaemic attack

Introduction

Studies indicate that the highest risk of stroke after either a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke is within the first two weeks.1 Interventions, such as carotid endarterectomy, have the greatest clinical benefit when performed quickly after the index event.2 It is therefore recommended that patients receive urgent outpatient evaluations following such events. The initial version of the National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke recommended evaluation within two weeks; the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines recommend within one week, and in 2004 the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) updated the national clinical guidelines in line with the AHA's recommendation.3–5 A rapid access neurovascular clinic has been provided at Stoke Mandeville Hospital since 1999 and its performance was examined and compared to these guidelines.

A variety of scores have been described recently to help distinguish patients at high risk eg the California, ABCD, and ABCD2 scores.6 These scores include simple clinical features, such as presence of speech disturbance and motor weakness. A referral proforma was developed to try to establish whether patients were likely to have had a cerebrovascular event based on similar simple clinical criteria. The performance of this proforma was examined to assess the likelihood of a final diagnosis of either stroke or TIA and whether faster evaluations were provided for high-risk patients.

Methods

Data were prospectively collected from all attendees to the urgent access neurovascular clinic between 2000 and 2006. The clinic was initially held on a fortnightly basis but it took place weekly from 2004. In addition, in 2003 the referral proforma was introduced to help assess the likelihood of a cerebrovascular diagnosis.

Data collection included the time of the most recent event (when known), the date of referral (information on the date of referral was not collected routinely until 2004), the date when seen in clinic, date of imaging (when performed) and the delay from the most recent event to completion of clinical opinion and imaging. Basic demographics and vascular risk factors were recorded along with the final diagnosis and the results of investigation. For this clinic, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including diffusion weighted imaging, was the primary brain imaging modality and carotid magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA) was the primary vascular imaging used, and they were generally performed together.7,8 Stroke and TIA were diagnosed according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.

Beginning in 2003, we requested general practitioner (GP) referrers to use a proforma to help assess patients. High-risk symptoms were considered to be speech disturbance and motor symptoms. Symptoms thought to indicate against a TIA include paraesthesias, amnesia and loss of consciousness. Based on the symptoms marked on the proforma, patients were classified as ‘high’, ‘intermediate’ and ‘low’ probability. ‘High’ probability required one of the high-risk symptoms, ‘intermediate’ none of the high-risk symptoms but none of the symptoms indicating against a TIA, and ‘low’ probability one of the symptoms thought to indicate against a TIA.

Statistical analysis used simple chi-square of proportions and the Kruskal–Wallis test for equality of populations rank test.

Results

Between 2000 and 2006, a total of 1,292 patients attended the clinic, with a mean age of 67 (18–100). Stroke (32%) was the most common diagnosis followed by TIA (23%). Other diagnoses included migraine (14%), epilepsy (4%), syncope (4%), brain tumour (1%) and a miscellany of other diagnoses for the remainder. Imaging was performed in the majority of patients (76%), predominantly with MRI, which demonstrated acute infarction in 28%. Computed tomography (CT) scanning was performed in 2%, predominantly due either to claustrophobia or a cardiac pacemaker. Data on imaging are missing for 69 patients (5.3%). Not all patients could give us a precise date of onset of symptoms but this was provided by 860 patients. The median delay from event to being seen was 16 days, (interquartile range (IQR) 10–25). Overall, 45% (388) were seen within two weeks of symptom onset, and only 15% (132) within one week. Figure 1 displays the percentage of patients who completed their evaluation within one or two weeks according to the year seen. Significantly fewer were seen within the two-week guideline in 2006 compared to previous years, and the median delay to being seen was likewise longer in 2006, at 21 days compared to previous years (p = 0.0001 Kruskal–Wallis test).

The proforma was used by referrers in 45% (193/425) of patients seen in the clinic. Patients classified as ‘high’ probability on the proforma were more likely to have had a stroke or TIA (58%, n = 60/103), compared to both ‘intermediate’ (40%, n= 19/47) and ‘low’ probability (7%, n=3/43), p<0.001. There was a trend to see patients sooner with ‘high’ probability (median delay 17 days), compared to ‘intermediate’ (27 days) and ‘low’ probability (22 days), p = 0.05.

The results of imaging also correlated with the probability as assessed by the referral proforma. Of patients with low probability, 51% (22/43) had normal imaging, 47% (20/43) were not scanned and only one patient (2%) demonstrated an infarct. In the intermediate category, 45% (21/47) had normal scans, 32% (15/47) were not scanned, and 23% (11/47) demonstrated infarction. In the high probability category, 65% (67/103) had normal scans, 4% (4/103) were not scanned, and 31% (32/103) had acute infarction demonstrated on diffusion weighted imaging.

The proportion of patients with a clinical diagnosis of stroke or TIA was similar in patients seen within two weeks compared to patients seen later at 59% versus 54% (p = ns), but the proportion of patients with a positive diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) result was reduced from 40% to 22% (p<0.001).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Percentage of patients seen within the one- and two-week guideline for evaluation of recent transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke.

Discussion

Our audit demonstrates a failure to achieve either the initial RCP standard or the 2004 revised target in the majority of patients. This failure occurred despite increasing the number of practitioners in the clinic and imposing modifications to improve access for imaging. It was concluded that a weekly district general hospital (DGH) outpatient system is not capable of achieving the targets.9

This audit confirms that simple clinical criteria can be used to appropriately classify patients at higher or lower risk of a cerebrovascular event.6 The audit also demonstrates imaging is more likely to be diagnostic when performed early.7,8 This supports the National Stroke Strategy recommendation for immediate referral in patients presenting with a recent TIA or minor stroke.10

Although not a subject of this audit, interventions to prevent stroke have also been shown to be time dependent,2 again reinforcing the need for urgent evaluation and management of patients with minor stroke or TIA. Local studies indicate few patients receive carotid endarterectomy in a timely fashion.11 The use of a score such as the ABCD2 score or modifications thereof may help to determine if some patients are of sufficiently low risk to consider outpatient evaluation. Emergency assessment and treatment of TIA lowers risk of recurrent vascular events.12 In the setting of a DGH, the most practical solution may be admission of high-risk patients, although alternative solutions, such as a daily open access clinic or the use of a telephone hotline, could also be feasible. The new National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke recommends implementation of urgent evaluation of high-risk TIA patients as a key priority.13

  • © 2009 Royal College of Physicians

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Coull AJ
    , Lovett JK, Rothwell PM on behalf of the Oxford Vascular Study. Population based study of early risk after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke: implications for public education and organisation of services. BMJ 2004; 328:326–8.doi:10.1136/bmj.37991.635266.44
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Rothwell PM
    , Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, Warlow CP, Barnett HJM. Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery. Lancet 2004; 363:915–1015.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15785-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Royal College of Physicians. National clinical guidelines for stroke: update 2002. London: RCP, 2002.
  4. Royal College of Physicians. National clinical guidelines for stroke, 2nd edn. London: RCP, 2004.
  5. ↵
    1. Albers GW
    , Hart RG, Lutsep HL, Newell DW, Sacco RL. AHA Scientific Statement: supplement to the guidelines for the management of transient ischemic attacks: a statement from the Ad Hoc Committee on Guidelines for the Management of Transient Ischemic Attacks, Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 1999; 30:2502–11.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Johnston SC
    , Rothwell PM, Nguyen-Huynh MN et al. Validation and refinement of scores to predict very early risk after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 2007; 369:283–92.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60150-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Schulz UGR
    , Briley D, Meagher T, Molyneux A, Rothwell P. Abnormalities on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging performed several weeks after a minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74:734–8.doi:10.1136/jnnp.74.6.734
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Schulz UG
    , Briley D, Meagher T, Molyneux A, Rothwell PM. Diffusion-weighted MRI in 300 patients presenting late with subacute transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. Stroke 2004; 35:2459–65.doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000143455.55877.b9
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Goldstein LB
    , Rothwell PM. Primary prevention and health services delivery. Stroke 2007; 38:222–4.doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000254717.89942.67
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Department of Health. National Stroke Strategy. London: DH, 2007.
  11. ↵
    1. Fairhead JF
    , Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Population based study of delays in carotid imaging and surgery and the risk of recurrent stroke. Neurology 2005; 65:371–5.doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000170368.82460.b4
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Rothwell PM
    , Giles MF, Chandratheva A et al. Effect of urgent treatment of transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke on early recurrent stroke (EXPRESS study): a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Lancet 2007; 370:1432–42.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61448-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Royal College of Physicians. National clinical guidelines for stroke, 3rd edn. London: RCP, 2008.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
An urgent access neurovascular clinic: audit of timeliness
Dennis Briley, Chris Durkin, Tom Meagher
Clinical Medicine Jun 2009, 9 (3) 236-238; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-3-236

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
An urgent access neurovascular clinic: audit of timeliness
Dennis Briley, Chris Durkin, Tom Meagher
Clinical Medicine Jun 2009, 9 (3) 236-238; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-3-236
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Reference
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Francis Crick Institute
  • The new UK internal medicine curriculum 
  • ‘Every breath we take: the lifelong impact of air pollution’ – a call for action
Show more Professional Issues

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians