Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Proteinuric renal disease

Peter Topham
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.9-3-284
Clin Med June 2009
Peter Topham
John Walls Renal Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester
Roles: Senior Lecturer in Nephrology; Honorary Consultant Nephrologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: peter.topham@uhl-tr.nhs.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading
Key Words
  • albumin to creatinine ratio
  • chronic kidney disease
  • nephrotic syndrome
  • protein to creatinine ratio
  • proteinuria

Proteinuria is a cardinal feature of renal disease and an important clinical finding because it:

  • is a marker for the presence of renal disease

  • mediates progressive renal dysfunction, and1,2

  • is an independent and powerful risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease.3

This review will focus on the causes of proteinuria, the approach to evaluating patients with proteinuria and general management principles for proteinuric patients.

Normal urine protein composition

Under normal conditions the low molecular weight proteins and albumin that are filtered from plasma into the early tubular fluid are almost completely reabsorbed in the proximal tubules. This results in a normal daily urinary protein excretion of less than 150 mg, of which only approximately 10 mg is albumin. More than 150 mg of proteinuria per day is regarded as abnormal, although it is now appreciated that early renal disease (particularly in diabetic patients) is associated with low level albuminuria (30–300 mg per day) (ie microalbuminuria). An increase in proteinuria can be identified in a number of clinical contexts.

Types of proteinuria

‘Functional’ proteinuria

Transient subnephrotic proteinuria, ‘functional proteinuria’, can occur following exercise or in association with fever or heart failure. It is benign and probably mediated by glomerular haemodynamic changes.4

Overflow proteinuria

Overflow proteinuria is caused by the increased filtration of low molecular weight proteins through a normal glomerular barrier. It is most commonly associated with increased free light-chain production in myeloma (Bence Jones proteinuria). It should be suspected if the urine dipstick is negative (dipsticks are albumin specific) when other tests indicate significant proteinuria.

Tubular proteinuria

Injury to the tubulointerstitial compartment results in the loss both of the proteins that are normally filtered and reabsorbed and of those released by tubular epithelial cells in response to injury.5

Orthostatic proteinuria

Orthostatic proteinuria is a benign condition characterised by proteinuria only when in the upright position. Proteinuria is absent in early morning samples but appears in samples collected later in the day. It is not associated with haematuria, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is preserved, and the prognosis is uniformly good.6

Glomerular proteinuria

Glomerular disease causes an increase in the permeability of the glomerular capillary wall to macromolecules (particularly albumin) and results in glomerular proteinuria. It is persistent and may be associated with haematuria and reduced GFR.

Presentation of proteinuric disease

Asymptomatic proteinuria

Most patients with proteinuria are asymptomatic and are identified when the urine is tested either as part of the:

  • evaluation for some key life event (eg life insurance application, armed forces recruitment), or

  • screening process for high-risk individuals (Table 1).

Symptomatic proteinuria

Nephrotic syndrome. The nephrotic syndrome comprises the following constellation of symptoms:

  • heavy proteinuria: above 50 mg/kg/day (ie >3.5 g/day in a 70 kg adult)

  • hypoalbuminaemia

  • oedema

  • hyperlipidaemia (and lipiduria).

Patients typically present with oedema, characteristically observed in a periorbital distribution on waking. Progressive oedema then develops with ankle, sacral and genital involvement. Pleural effusions and ascites may also develop. Leukonychia results from hypoalbuminuria, and xanthelasma may also be seen.7 Patients with this level of proteinuria may describe frothing of the urine on micturition. The common causes of nephrotic syndrome are shown in Table 2.

Nephritic syndrome. The nephritic syndrome comprises:

  • oedema

  • hypertension

  • proteinuria with significant hematuria

  • reduced GFR.

Patients typically present with reduced urine output, and often describe urine as having a smokey or Coca-Cola colour. Ankle oedema is often present but is less marked than in the nephrotic syndrome. Hypertension is usual and may be severe. Nephritic syndrome often occurs with evidence of systemic disease (see Table 2).8

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Risk factors that prompt screening (including proteinuria testing) for chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Evaluation of proteinuria (Fig 1)

If proteinuria has been detected on a urine dipstick, dipstick testing should be repeated three times to determine whether it is persistent. Trace positivity can be ignored since the dipsticks are very sensitive. The urine should be cultured. For persistent abnormalities, quantification of the proteinuria is necessary.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Common causes of nephrotic and nephritic syndromes.

Current guidelines indicate that when screening high-risk groups for proteinuria, a quantitative measure (see below) is used rather than dipstick testing.9

Quantification

Quantification of proteinuria has historically been performed on 24-hour urine collections; these are inconvenient for patients and therefore inaccurate. Current best practice involves measuring the albumin and/or protein concentration in a ‘spot’ urine sample (ideally, an early morning sample).10

To correct for the effects of urine concentration (hydration state), the albumin/protein concentration is normalised to the creatinine concentration and expressed as the albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) and protein to creatinine ratio (PCR), respectively (expressed as mg albumin or protein/mmol creatinine). An average person excretes approximately 10 mmol of creatinine per day, so the ACR and PCR can be multiplied by 10 to give an estimate of the daily albumin/protein loss (in mg). The ACR is more sensitive than the PCR, so the former measurement is recommended for the detection and identification of proteinuria while the PCR is reserved for quantification and monitoring.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Algorithm for the evaluation of non-diabetic patients with asymptomatic proteinuria. ACEI = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ACR = albumin to creatinine ratio; BP = blood pressure; CKD = chronic kidney disease; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; PCR = protein to creatinine ratio; rpt = repeat. Reproduced with permission from NICE.

Excretory renal function

The excretory renal function should also be determined (plasma creatinine concentration and the calculated estimated GFR (eGFR)). The patient can then be categorised according to their stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) (Fig 1; Table 3).9

Interpreting proteinuria values

Normal

Normal protein excretion is less than 150 mg per day – equivalent to a urine PCR of less than 15 mg/mmol.

Nephrotic-range proteinuria

The nephrotic range of proteinuria is more than 3.5 g a day (PCR >350 mg/mmol). A protein that is predominantly albumin (ie dipstick-positive or high urine ACR) is characteristic of glomerular disease.

Non-nephrotic proteinuria

A situation in which there is a urine PCR of 15–350 mg/mmol (ie 150 mg to 3.5 g of proteinuria per day) is defined as non-nephrotic proteinuria. This can result from a wide variety of conditions including glomerular disease, non-glomerular parenchymal renal disease and urinary tract disease outside the kidney.

Microalbuminuria

Microalbuminuria defines an albumin excretion of 30–300 mg/day. The microalbuminuric range in the urine ACR is 2.5–30 mg/mmol for men and 3.5–30 mg/mmol for women. This level is below the detection threshold for conventional dipsticks and is used to identify early diabetic nephropathy. Arguably, it may also be used to assess cardiovascular risk in at-risk populations (eg patients with hypertension).

When to refer to the nephrology service

The criteria for referral for specialist renal assessment are listed in Table 4.9

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

Stages of chronic kidney disease.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 4.

Criteria for referral for specialist renal assessment.

Key Points

Proteinuria is a powerful risk factor for the development of progressive renal dysfunction and cardiovascular disease

Measurement of urine albumin to creatinine ratio or protein to creatinine ratio on a ‘spot’ urine sample has made 24-hour urine collections for proteinuria quantification unnecessary

Screening for proteinuria should be undertaken in patients with risk factors for the development of chronic kidney disease

Early identification of patients with proteinuria offers the best chance of preventing progressive renal dysfunction

Blood pressure control, blockade of the renin-angiotensin system and cardiovascular risk factor management are the key therapeutic goals in proteinuric patients

Management of proteinuria

The aims of the management of proteinuric patients are to:

  • identify the underlying cause and treat where possible

  • minimise the risk of renal function deterioration by reducing proteinuria and controlling hypertension

  • minimise the risk of cardiovascular disease

  • prepare patients with progressive disease for renal replacement therapy.

Patients with nephrotic and nephritic syndromes require specialist renal evaluation. The management of such patients will not be included in this article.

General measures

Patients should be encouraged to take exercise, achieve a healthy weight and stop smoking.9

Blood pressure control and proteinuria reduction

Non-diabetic patients. The aim in non-diabetic patients is to keep systolic blood pressure below 140 mmHg (target 120–139 mmHg) and diastolic below 90 mmHg. For those with an ACR above 30 mg/mmol, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) should be first-line therapy for hypertension. An angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) may be used if the patient is intolerant of ACEIs. If the ACR is over 70 mg/mmol (PCR >100 mg/mmol), there is evidence that a combination of an ACEI and ARB provides an additional antiproteinuric and renoprotective effect.11,12 Patients with an ACR above 70 mg/mmol without hypertension also derive renoprotection from combined ACEI and ARB treatment.

Diabetic patients. The threshold for commencing ACEIs/ARBs is lower in patients with diabetes. An ACR above 2.5 mg/mmol in men or above 3.5 mg/mmol in women justifies the use of ACEIs or ARBs, even in the absence of hypertension.

When used, the dose of either the ACEI or ARB should be increased to the maximum tolerated dose before adding a second agent. For maximum antiproteinuric effect, dietary sodium should be limited to 50–70 mmol/day. About 1–2 weeks after commencing or increasing the dose of an ACEI or ARB, the serum potassium and eGFR should be checked. If the serum potassium rises to over 6.0 mmol/l or the eGFR decreases by more than 25% from baseline (or plasma creatinine increases by more than 30%) without any other explanation, the ACEI or ARB should be discontinued.

Cardiovascular risk management

Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of mortality in patients with proteinuric renal disease so modification of cardiovascular risk is an important treatment goal.13 The current recommendations are to use statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, in the same way as they are used in the general population without CKD, and for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, irrespective of baseline lipid values. Low-dose aspirin may be used for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Multiple antiplatelet drugs should be avoided in CKD patients because of an increased bleeding risk.9

Conclusions

Proteinuric disease is a major risk factor for renal failure and cardiovascular morbidity. Early identification of proteinuric patients, aggressive blood pressure control, ACEI/ARB treatment and cardiovascular risk management are key strategies aimed at preventing morbidity and mortality in these high-risk patients.

  • © 2009 Royal College of Physicians

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Remuzzi G
    . Nephropathic nature of proteinuria. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 1999; 8:655–63.doi:10.1097/00041552-199911000-00001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Remuzzi G
    , Bertani T. Pathophysiology of progressive nephropathies. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1448–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Brantsma AH
    , Bakker SJ, de Zeeuw D, de Jong PE, Gansevoort RT; PREVEND Study Group. Extended prognostic value of urinary albumin excretion for cardiovascular events. J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 19:1785–91.doi:10.1681/ASN.2007101065
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Bellinghieri G
    , Savica V, Santoro D. Renal alterations during exercise. J Ren Nutr 2008; 18:158–64.doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2007.10.031
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Barratt J
    , Topham P. Urine proteomics: the present and future of measuring urinary protein components in disease. CMAJ 2007; 177:361–8.doi:10.1503/cmaj.061590
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Vehaskari VM
    . Mechanism of orthostatic proteinuria. Pediatr Nephrol 1990; 4:328–30.doi:10.1007/BF00862510
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Hull RP
    , Goldsmith DJ. Nephrotic syndrome in adults. BMJ 2008; 336:1185–9.doi:10.1136/bmj.39576.709711.80
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Yoshizawa N
    . Acute glomerulonephritis. Intern Med 2000; 39:687–94.doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.39.687
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Chronic kidney disease. Early identification and management of chronic kidney disease in adults in primary and secondary care. Clinical guideline CG73. London: NICE, 2008. Available at www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/CG73
  10. ↵
    1. Parsons MP
    , Newman DJ, Newall RG, Price CP. Validation of a point-of-care assay for the urinary albumin:creatinine ratio. Clin Chem 1999; 45:414–7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Wolf G
    , Ritz E. Combination therapy with ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers to halt progression of chronic renal disease: pathophysiology and indications. Review. Kidney Int 2005; 67:799–812.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Cravedi P
    , Ruggenenti P, Remuzzi G. Intensified inhibition of renin-angiotensin system: a way to improve renal protection? Curr Hypertens Rep 2007; 9:430–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. de Zeeuw D
    . Renal disease: a common and a silent killer. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2008; 5(Suppl 1): S27–35.doi:10.1038/ncpcardio0853
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Proteinuric renal disease
Peter Topham
Clinical Medicine Jun 2009, 9 (3) 284-287; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-3-284

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Proteinuric renal disease
Peter Topham
Clinical Medicine Jun 2009, 9 (3) 284-287; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-3-284
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Normal urine protein composition
    • Types of proteinuria
    • Presentation of proteinuric disease
    • Evaluation of proteinuria (Fig 1)
    • Interpreting proteinuria values
    • When to refer to the nephrology service
    • Management of proteinuria
    • Cardiovascular risk management
    • Conclusions
    • Reference
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • HIV and the kidney in the acute medical unit
  • CME Renal medicine (100621): self-assessment questionnaire
  • Conservative care of the patient with end-stage renal disease
Show more CME Renal Medicine

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2020 by the Royal College of Physicians