Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Fig 1.
Workflow depicting how a centralised triage step could provide greater first-phase legal accessibility for patients of limited means, while reducing the number of costly trials requiring adversarial expert testimonies. The ‘reasonable practitioner’ specified in this schema represents an ‘expert’ who is deemed likely to provide a balanced view of errors and liabilities for the trial context.
- Fig 2.
Comparison of fault-based adversarial medical litigation (left) with no-fault compensation (lower right), illustrating (i) the imbalance of resources faced by plaintiffs in the former system, due in large part to the indemnity support for physician-defendants, and (ii) the less labour-intensive and more streamlined approach of the no-fault system.
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.