Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Infrastructure – the key to healthcare improvement

Linda Luxon
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.15.002
Future Healthcare Journal February 2015
Linda Luxon
ARoyal College of Physicians, and chair of the Future Hospital Commission Infrastructure Workstream
Roles: Treasurer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: linda.luxon@rcplondon.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

In this issue, we focus on the infrastructure workstream of the Future Hospital project, and notable figures provide their perspective on the built environment and specific elements of healthcare infrastructure, including architecture, design, commissioning a new hospital, sustainability and information technology, both in the UK and overseas. Particular thanks are due to Tom Downes for editing this special section.

Infrastructure must integrate the hospital, as the centre for acute and inpatient care, into the broader health care system,1 and should facilitate the seven domains of quality2 – patient experience, effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, safety, equity and sustainability. Infrastructure includes the built environment and supporting elements: equipment, access, information technology (IT), systems and processes, sustainability initiatives and staff. Overall these interwoven facets should enable patients to move seamlessly, with their privacy and dignity maintained at all times,3 from initial referral through local hospitals to specialist tertiary centres and discharge to appropriate care (home, care home, or community hospital with intermediate care), whatever the age, disorder or social circumstances of the patient.

Infrastructure is a key pillar supporting the fundamental aim of promoting improved standards of care and wellbeing for all patients, together with a good experience of the health care system. In parallel, the healthcare system and staff must support effective health promotion, prevention and self-care of the whole population. ‘Every contact counts’ (www.makingeverycontactcount.co.uk/) and, in this regard, hospitals have a key role in providing contact for disadvantaged population groups, such as the homeless, the abused and addicts, who do not access primary care. In addition, a secondary aim must be to improve the wellbeing of staff, as this is integrally related to ensuring improved care for patients.4

The built environment

Healthcare sites, including hospitals, should be integrated into the broader community, wherever possible, to promote accessibility, societal ‘buy-in’ and well-being. There should be easy access, car parking and transport facilities and clear signage within the hospital and hospital grounds to ensure patients and families can easily navigate all hospital services.5 New hospital buildings should be constructed to a high standard, reflecting certain principles in their design, specifically flexibility of usage of space to keep services adaptable and revenue costs down, as exemplified by the Procure21+ programme6 (www.procure21plus.nhs.uk/standardshare). Wards and patient areas should have space, light and good views wherever possible, to promote a patient-friendly and healing environment.7 In addition there should be adequate space between beds for procedures, clinical activities and infection control.8 Co-location of related services serves efficiency and timeliness of services, as do separate access routes for staff, patients and the public to wards and services. These clinically led design features are exemplified in the South West Acute Hospital in Enniskillen.

A range of amenities, such as a choice of food, shops, a restaurant, postage, IT facilities, telephone, TV/radio access and chaplains, improve patient and staff wellbeing, while regular childcare services support seven-day staff working. Importantly, neither patients nor services should be constrained by the physical environment, but the environment should be configured to be fit-for-purpose, with a high degree of cleanliness,5 and should be sufficiently flexible to serve all patients, including both the physically and mentally disabled.

Existing buildings may require reconfiguration to promote seamless and efficient healthcare, with specific services in specific sites; for example, acute care services on one site, with intermediate community care, outpatients, mental health, rehabilitation, integrated therapy and social services, together with day care and hospice care, on another. Such provision across the whole healthcare pathway should be supported by integrated medical, nursing and multi-professional healthcare services. In the community, this cross-cutting approach is highlighted by the Bromley by Bow Health Centre (www.bbbc.org.uk/pages/health-centre), which provides a holistic approach to helping people towards a healthier lifestyle.

Medical equipment

A comprehensive, corporate approach to managing medical equipment, overseen by a responsible lead, ensures that appropriate medical equipment is available and fit-for-purpose, as required for the delivery of high quality clinical services. This requires scrutiny of every element of the life cycle of a device from specification of requirements, through evaluation of competing products, decontamination, procurement, introduction, maintenance and quality assurance to disposal and funded plans for equipment replacement. In addition, the responsible lead should evaluate and introduce appropriate new technologies and ensure that requirements for medical equipment are factored into service development proposals.9 The management of risks associated with medical equipment, including responding to adverse incidents, should also be undertaken within a corporate framework.

Access

The term ‘access’ refers to patient access to all healthcare services, including mental health support,10 physical access to healthcare facilities and all relevant hospital information, including clinical service statistics, in electronic, written or audio formats.

Access to information should be recognised as an effective way in which to promote both patient and staff wellbeing. There should be equity of access irrespective of age (eg published age cohort statistics for interventions/procedures to ensure equity), gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation and disability. Regular review and flexibility of all aspects of access are required to ensure continual development and optimal provision.

Information provided should include clinic times, appointment arrangements allowing linked appointments across different disciplines/levels of healthcare, named doctors in clinics, the nature and role of multidisciplinary teams, transport facilities and costs. Patient-centred services benefit from easy access to information about disorders, investigations, treatments and medicines, together with healthcare education advice providing both prevention and self-care information. Good housekeeping information may relate to visiting hours, shops (goods and opening hours), religious contacts/services, telephone arrangements and, for inpatients, hospital activities, such as exhibitions, music, and radio and television programmes.

Technology

Fully integrated information technology systems should support the delivery of information to ensure patients, carers and health professionals can access information they need, when they need it. In addition, technology could support improved healthcare efficiency both in outreach provision of care11 and by reducing travel and healthcare visits and in inpatient provision. At the South West Acute Hospital in Enniskillen, each bed has a television with clinical information and data displayed for the clinician and health promotion messages displayed to the patient. Hospital efficiencies could be achieved by supplying multiple terminals around the hospital, allowing real-time access to an interactive database of inpatient admission and discharge information, with referral details, patient information and location (kept up-to-date), the name, grade and contact details of the clerking doctor, the time of medical assessment, and details of investigations (including outstanding results) and specialty reviews. This should also include a capacity and activity management system, linked to the wider health and social care providers and personal communication devices detailing contact details to each member of the clinical team in each shift. Provision of apps with NICE guidelines, national and local protocols and the BNF would reduce errors and improve care.

Governance and organisational infrastructure

The challenge here is to develop better, faster, cheaper ways of providing healthcare by promoting and supporting core processes, using technology to enable flexible and adaptive delivery. This is achieved by the development of organisational processes focused on providing high quality, sustainable, patient-centred services, with coordination of both planned and unplanned care, so that neither impacts upon the other. Modelling and simulation of systems and proposed changes, as exemplified by the work of the Cumberland Initiative (www.cumberland-initiative.org/), can underpin such activity. Regular meetings of social and healthcare facilities within a locality allow outcomes to be reviewed, bottlenecks identified, limitations and concerns shared and interactions to be evaluated, ensuring that services are collaboratively and effectively delivered to provide cost-efficient healthcare across the entire pathway.

Administrative and organisational arrangements, with leadership informed by managerial, clinical and patient inputs, should be in place to ensure appropriate staffing structures, technology and equipment management. There should be recognition of the value of education and research, with processes to ensure dedicated, adequate time for research, continuing professional development, and managerial and national contributions at all levels of clinical professional careers, with, where necessary, incentives for trusts to promote the development of improved care.

Staff structures

Staff structures have changed, with the emphasis on multidisciplinary teams and the emergence of new healthcare roles, including physician assistants,12 consultant healthcare scientists13 and advanced nurse (clinical) practitioners.14 Staff planning should focus on optimising quality patient care, irrespective of professional label, and ensuring cost-effective and resource-efficient use of all staff. Key principles include:

  • provision of a seven day service

  • integrated team of professionals, who are trained, competent and equipped in line with local/national standards

  • each discipline spanning the entire patient pathway and integrated at all levels to promote quality of care, seamless transition and cost efficiency

  • individuals not practising in isolation

  • teams being engaged with admission assessment, with planned discharge assessment on the day of admission to promote efficient patient flows.

Sustainable health care

There is evidence that sustainable systems and processes provide both patient benefit and save costs, quite apart from reducing the carbon footprint. These key principles lie in a diverse range of approaches.

Primary and secondary prevention should be a goal of every patient encounter, with resource centres providing patient-centred family education, which promotes better health. In addition, the early identification of patients who would benefit from proactive management has demonstrable patient and economic value. For example, in Birmingham, systematic kidney disease management, in a large population with diabetes mellitus, led to significantly improved patient outcomes, increased the productivity of a specialist service and reduced healthcare costs.15 In rehabilitation medicine, early involvement of rehabilitation physicians in the acute setting reduced length of stay and complications.16

Systems reconfiguration, as exemplified by the US model of vertical integration,17 reduces waste and duplication, and improves efficiency and care co-ordination with reduced costs and energy consumption. In the UK, an integrated budget across a hospital and primary care trust/clinical commissioning group would share financial risk and ensure that a hospital visit would add value, not provided by a phone call or visit from a district nurse.

Reconfiguration of services may improve healthcare efficiency; flexible models of care – for example, care closer to home via telephone consultations and tele-medicine,18 or acute care at the front door of a hospital, supported by dedicated core services – would avoid the disruption of inpatient/planned investigations and treatment. Multidisciplinary electronic discharge protocols can be initiated on the day of admission and linked to care provision on discharge.19 Another mechanism, as exemplified at the University Hospital of North Staffordshire, is the introduction of a patient flow bundle reducing the length of stay.20

The NHS accounts for 5% of all road traffic in England and travel is responsible for 18% of the NHS carbon footprint in England.21 Initiatives to promote active transport for both patients and staff, such as bicycle lanes, secure bicycle racks, free parking for multi-occupancy vehicles, and, for staff, bicycle purchase schemes and facilities to change and shower, improve health and reduce costs and the carbon footprint. North Bristol Trust now sources all food within a 50 mile radius wherever possible, at no increase in cost.22

Sustainable initiatives such as motion-sensitive light detectors, low energy lighting, automatic switch-off of office computers and solar panels for heating will reduce energy expenditure, as exemplified by the TLC initiative at Bart's Healthcare Trust, where £100,000 has been saved – extrapolated to the entire NHS a figure of £35 million has been estimated.23 A culture change – buy less, use less, re-use more and recycle – would rationalise procurement and reduce costs, for example with respect to re-prescription and poor compliance with drug prescriptions.

A major change in culture and accountability can be achieved by initiatives such as

  • public reporting of sustainability targets and achievements – for example, US Health Hospitals Initiative (www.HHI.org) and Global Green and Healthy Hospitals network (www.greenhospitals.net)

  • staff education and awareness-raising events, such as ‘Sustainable Action Planning’ for clinical teams at http://sap.greenerhealthcare.org

  • incentives such as ward contests and gain sharing, as exemplified by the Whittington Hospital in London, the Green Ward Competition 2012: http://sustainablehealthcare.org.uk/sustainable-operating-theatres/news/2012/06/green-ward-winners-whittington.

Importantly, regulatory financial incentives such as the introduction in April 2012 of a duty on hospital trusts to report on sustainability as part of their financial reporting mechanisms24 and obligations related to the carbon reduction commitment energy efficiency scheme and the EU emissions trading scheme25 will further drive the sustainable healthcare agenda.

Conclusion

Thus, multiple infrastructure systems, processes and personnel arrangements are key to the Future Hospital project aims and objectives, underpinning a new approach to healthcare that will ensure efficiency, cost reduction, sustainability and a reduced carbon footprint, and most importantly improved patient care.

  • © 2015 Royal College of Physicians

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Department of Health
    . Inpatient care. Health building note 04-01: adult inpatient facilities. DH, 2013. Available online at www.dhsspsni.gov.uk/hbn_04-01_adult_in-patient_facilities_final.pdf [Accessed 20 November 2014].
  2. 2.↵
    1. Atkinson S,
    2. Ingham J,
    3. Cheshire M,
    4. Went S
    . Defining quality and quality improvement. Clin Med 2010;10:537–9.doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.10-6-537
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Department of Health
    . Creating a patient-led NHS. DH, 2001.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Department of Health
    . NHS health and well-being: final report. DH, 2009. Available online at www.nhshealthandwellbeing.org/FinalReport.html [Accessed 20 November 2014].
  5. 5.↵
    1. Department of Health
    . Introducing a new system of patient-led inspections of the hospital environment: engagement with third-sector organisations. DH, 2012. Available online at www.nationalvoices.org.uk/sites/www.nationalvoices.org.uk/files/p-li_survey_-_final_report.pdf [Accessed 20 November 2014].
  6. 6.↵
    1. Procure21+
    . ProCure21 +repeatable room designs: an introduction for clinicians. Department of Health, 2014.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Finn H,
    2. Waller S
    . Enhancing the healing environment: a guide for NHS trusts. King's Fund, 2004.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Department of Health
    . Health Building Note 00-09: Infection control in the built environment. DH, 2013. Available online at www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-for-infection-control-in-the-built-environment [Accessed 20 November 2014].
  9. 9.↵
    1. Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency
    . Managing medical devices: guidance for healthcare and social services organisations. MHRA, 2014. Available online at www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/dts-bs/documents/publication/con2025143.pdf [Accessed 20 November 2014].
  10. 10.↵
    1. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges
    . Managing urgent mental health needs in the acute trust: a guide by practitioners, for managers and commissioners in England and Wales. AMRC, 2008. Available online at www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/ManagingurgentMHneed.pdf [Accessed 20 November 2014].
  11. 11.↵
    1. Moore A
    . Telehealth special report: remote control of care. Health Science J, 6 June 2014. Available online at www.hsj.co.uk/resource-centre/supplements/telehealth-special-reportremote-control-of-care/5071580.article.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ross N,
    2. Parle J,
    3. Begg P,
    4. Kuhns D
    . The case for the physician assistant. Clin Med 2012;12:200–6.doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.12-3-200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. NHS Careers
    . Careers in healthcare science. www.nhscareers.nhs.uk/explore-by-career/healthcare-science/download-factsheets/ [Accessed 20 November 2014].
  14. 14.↵
    1. Royal College of Nursing
    . Advanced nurse practitioners: An RCN guide to advanced nursing practice, advanced nurse practitioners and programme accreditation. RCN, 2012. Available online at www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/146478/003207.pdf [Accessed 20 November 2014].
  15. 15.↵
    1. Rayner HC,
    2. Hollingworth L,
    3. Higgins R,
    4. Dodds S
    . Systematic kidney disease management in a population with diabetes mellitus: turning the tide of kidney failure. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:903–10.doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000061
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Royal College of Physicians and British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine
    . Medical rehabilitation in 2011 and beyond. RCP, 2010. Available online at www.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites/default/files/-documents/medical-rehabilitation-2011-and-beyond.pdf [Accessed 20 November 2014].
  17. 17.↵
    1. Gao J,
    2. Moran E,
    3. Almenoff PL,
    4. et al.
    Variations in efficiency and the relationship to quality of care in the veterans health system. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011; 30:655–63.doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0435
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Smith AC,
    2. Patterson V,
    3. Scott RE
    . How telemedicine helps. BMJ 2007;335:1060.doi:10.1136/bmj.39402.471863.BE
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Buckler LT,
    2. Teasdale C,
    3. Turner M,
    4. et al.
    The patient-centered discharge–an electronic discharge process is associated with improvements in quality and patient satisfaction. J Healthc Qual 2014, in press.
  20. 20.↵
    1. University Hospital of North Staffordshire
    . Caring With Knowledge, Value Through Quality: Annual Report 2012–2013. UHNS 2013. www.uhns.nhs.uk/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket = mz4_S5AAKY4%3D&tabid = 87 [Accessed 20 November 2014].
  21. 21.↵
    1. NHS Sustainable Development Unit
    . Low carbon travel, transport, and access. www.sdu.nhs.uk/documents/publications/1232901538_QFPD_low_carbon_travel,_transport_and_access.pdf [Accessed 20 November 2014].
  22. 22.↵
    1. NHS Sustainable Development Unit
    . Case study (Food): North Bristol NHS Trust. www.sdu.nhs.uk/documents/case_study/Case_study_Bristol_food_SDU_Final.pdf [Accessed 20 November 2014].
  23. 23.↵
    1. Barts Health NHS Trust
    . Changing energy behaviours in the NHS: Operation TLC. www.sduhealth.org.uk/news/214/barts-health-nhs-trust-saves-100000-with-a-bit-of-tlc/ [Accessed 20 November 2014].
  24. 24.↵
    1. Sustainable Development Unit
    . Governance on sustainability: -statutory, regulatory and policy drivers. SDU, 2014. Available online at www.sduhealth.org.uk/delivery/plan.aspx [Accessed 12 December 2014].
  25. 25.↵
    1. European Commission
    . The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/index_en.htm [Accessed 20 November 2014].
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Infrastructure – the key to healthcare improvement
Linda Luxon
Future Healthcare Journal Feb 2015, 2 (1) 4-7; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.15.002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Infrastructure – the key to healthcare improvement
Linda Luxon
Future Healthcare Journal Feb 2015, 2 (1) 4-7; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.15.002
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • The built environment
    • Medical equipment
    • Access
    • Technology
    • Governance and organisational infrastructure
    • Staff structures
    • Sustainable health care
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The past, the present, and the future: reflecting on ­medical history as we welcome new leaders
  • Targeting limited NHS resources to affect optimal care
  • Regulation needs new legislation to get lighter
Show more Editorials

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians