Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Thinking differently about complaints in the NHS

David Ross
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.15.020
Future Healthcare Journal February 2015
David Ross
St Richard's Hospital, Chichester
Roles: Chest physician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Editor – Dr Haxby sets out a refreshing call for managing complaints in the NHS more positively (Haxby E, FHJ October 2014 pp 103–7), citing the Francis report.1

Though complaints may be an opportunity to bring patients and healthcare organisations (HCOs) closer together, they are often delegated to middle managers who are expected to synthesise replies from several consultants (who may not fully trust the complaints process) into a single Frankenstein letter linked with bureaucratic language. The language of such responses as well as the delay can further alienate patients or their relatives.

Trusts seem unlikely to move away from what they perceive as the safest medico-legal stance, but complainants could be engaged constructively by a senior medical professional acting as their advocate in parallel with the bureaucracy. Such a person could open a dialogue in the language (and medium) of the complainant, while assessing and investigating complaints on their behalf without admitting liability, pending and hopefully invigorating the eventual bureaucratic response. Such a dialogue would allow candour about the finite resources available in the NHS. If the advocate were sufficiently senior, perhaps someone either side of retirement, they could engage consultants and other health professionals effectively, driving improvement within the Trust. (One could even imagine a ‘chamber’ for different local HCOs.)

The drawback to any paradigm shift required to meet the requirements of the Francis Report would be the cost in the short term.

  • © 2015 Royal College of Physicians

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Francis R
    (Chair). The Mid-Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Enquiry. Department of Health, 2013.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Thinking differently about complaints in the NHS
David Ross
Future Healthcare Journal Feb 2015, 2 (1) 72; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.15.020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Thinking differently about complaints in the NHS
David Ross
Future Healthcare Journal Feb 2015, 2 (1) 72; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.15.020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Response
  • Functional disorders and chronic pain
  • A further explanation for chest pain without visible coronary artery disease
Show more Letters to the editor

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians