Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Letters to the editor

Timothy W Evans and Timothy WR Briggs
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.4-2-151
Future Hosp J June 2017
Timothy W Evans
aNHS Improvement, London, UK
Roles: National director of clinical productivity
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy WR Briggs
bNHS Improvement, London, UK
Roles: National director of clinical quality and efficiency
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Editor – we read with great interest the opinion piece concerning consultant job planning for a 7-day service authored by Dr Matthew Lewis in last issue of Future Hospital Journal.1 We were each previously medical directors, with a combined experience totalling some 25 years, and found the examples of how to plan for 7-day services both clear and compelling. Lewis’ conclusion that ‘effective job planning allows finite resources to be used to the greatest effect’ is one with which we entirely concur. Managing the way our workforce is deployed to ensure their skills are applied to best effect will ensure we are able to offer high-quality care to our patients in the most efficient way. This fundamental principle underlies the implementation of a number of the 15 recommendations of Lord Carter's report into unwarranted variations in the performance of NHS acute trusts in England.2 Evidence of such variability has emerged previously in the report of the British Orthopaedic Association authored by TB.3 This ‘getting it right first time’ (GIRFT) philosophy has led to real improvements in surgical outcomes within elective orthopaedics services and, for the first time, a fall in litigation claims – an important surrogate for quality. The GIRFT programme has now been funded to expand to more than 30 specialties. Each has a national lead, usually a clinician of national or international stature, and access to data that will ensure we know ‘what good looks like’ in terms of both outcomes and service delivery. Clinically conceived, clinically led and delivered by clinicians, hospital visits are already underway, at which the GIRFT leads engage face to face with the consultants and other clinical staff responsible for delivering each service ‘on the ground’. This ensures they adopt best practices as defined by royal colleges and specialist societies, which have without exception expressed their support for the programme. Matching job plans for medical and non-medical clinical staff (eg allied health professionals, pharmacists) and those providing diagnostic services will be crucial to ensure best practice can actually be adopted and thereby meet the (7-day) needs of patients, the demands of actually providing the service and to maximise the beneficial impact of the NHS’ physical (eg operating theatres, imaging equipment) and human resources.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2017. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Lewis M.
    Consultant job planning for a 7 day service. Future Hospital Journal 2017;4:33–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Briggs T.
    Getting it right first time. A national review of adult ­elective orthopaedic services in England. London: British Orthopaedic Association, 2015.
  3. ↵
    1. Lord Carter of Coles
    . Operational productivity and performance in English NHS acute trusts: unwarranted variations. London: Department of Health, 2016.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Letters to the editor
Timothy W Evans, Timothy WR Briggs
Future Hosp J Jun 2017, 4 (2) 151; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.4-2-151

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Letters to the editor
Timothy W Evans, Timothy WR Briggs
Future Hosp J Jun 2017, 4 (2) 151; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.4-2-151
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Conflicts of interest
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • COVID-19 infection as a parameter in the CHA2DS2 vascular risk assessment tool
  • Addressing obesity and homelessness via ChatGPT
  • The Situational Judgement Test: not the right answer for UK Foundation Programme Allocation
Show more Letters to the editor

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2023 by the Royal College of Physicians