Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Public health in hospitals – can informatics bridge the gap?

Shamil Haroon, Neeraj Bhala, Krishnarajah Niranthara Kumar, Darren Wooldridge, Jan Hoogewerf and John Williams
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.4-3-220
Future Hosp J October 2017
Shamil Haroon
Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Roles: Clinical lecturer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neeraj Bhala
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Roles: Consultant physician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Krishnarajah Niranthara Kumar
Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Roles: Senior clinical lecturer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Darren Wooldridge
Health Informatics Unit, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK
Roles: Project manager
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Hoogewerf
Health Informatics Unit, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK
Roles: Programme manager
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Williams
Health Informatics Unit, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK
Roles: Director
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

The NHS England Five Year Forward View emphasised the need for a ‘radical upgrade in prevention and public health’.1 Community health and social care are both engaged in preventative care, but hospitals also play a key role in this agenda.2 In 2014–15 alone, hospitals in England served 16 million finished admission episodes and over 100 million outpatient appointments.3 These encounters represent huge opportunities to provide health promotion at scale to individuals at high risk of preventable morbidity and mortality.

There are a number of barriers to health promotion in hospitals, such as limited resources and a tendency to focus on diagnosis and treatment of specific diseases, rather than risk factors. This is reflected in the findings of the national health promotion in hospital audits in England, which found that few hospitals met the standards for assessment and health promotion practice for important modifiable risk factors, including smoking and alcohol misuse.4

Clinical information systems may help overcome some of these barriers by facilitating the accurate documentation of risk behaviours in electronic health records. Standards are required to ensure these data are validated, consistent and clinically useful. A national project is being undertaken by the University of Birmingham and Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, in partnership with the Royal College of Physicians Health Informatics Unit, to develop national data standards for recording alcohol and tobacco use in electronic health records.5 National consultation with patients, healthcare professionals, public health professionals, IT system suppliers and informaticians, as well as literature reviews, and pilot work are being undertaken to ensure the standards are evidence and consensus based, acceptable to end users, and implementable.

The objectives of these standards are to record information on alcohol and tobacco use that:

  • enables healthcare staff and clinical information systems to identify at-risk patients, and provide preventative and therapeutic interventions

  • is relevant to public health and healthcare organisations to inform commissioning and delivery of preventative services and clinical audit of health promotion practices

  • enables epidemiological and clinical research on alcohol and tobacco consumption among patients in primary and secondary care

  • enables patient-relevant information to be shared across the healthcare system to improve coordination and continuity of care.

Implementation of these standards could enable the systematic identification of patients with ongoing exposure to modifiable behavioural risk factors and automated delivery of evidence-based interventions. For example, documentation of current smoking in an electronic health record could trigger an automated SMS message to patients containing advice on how to access NHS smoking cessation services. Recording harmful alcohol use could automatically prompt an alcohol support worker to give brief advice to patients prior to discharge. Use of health informatics in this way could potentially be more cost-effective than solely relying on healthcare staff to deliver health promotion and could be an efficient gateway to preventative services.

The development of standards for clinical information recording and better use of health informatics offers a means to improve quality and outcomes for both individual patients and the wider population, aligning clinical and public health aims.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2017. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. NHS England
    . NHS Five Year Forward View. London: NHS England, 2014.
  2. ↵
    1. Wright J
    , Franks A, Ayres P, et al. Public health in hospitals: the missing link in health improvement. J Public Health Med 2002;24:152–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Health and Social Care Information Centre
    . Provisional Monthly Hospital Episode Statistics for Admitted Patient Care, Outpatients and Accident and Emergency Data – April 2014 to March 2015. London: HSCIC, 2015. http://content.digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB17794 [Accessed 11 August 2017].
  4. ↵
    1. Lee DJ
    , Knuckey S, Cook GA. Changes in health promotion practice in hospitals across England: the National Health Promotion in Hospital Audit 2009 and 2011. Journal of Public Health 2013;36:651–7.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Royal College of Physicians
    . Alcohol and tobacco data standards consultation. www.rcplondon.ac.uk/news/alcohol-and-tobacco-data-standards-consultation [Accessed 11 August 2017].
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Public health in hospitals – can informatics bridge the gap?
Shamil Haroon, Neeraj Bhala, Krishnarajah Niranthara Kumar, Darren Wooldridge, Jan Hoogewerf, John Williams
Future Hosp J Oct 2017, 4 (3) 220-221; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.4-3-220

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Public health in hospitals – can informatics bridge the gap?
Shamil Haroon, Neeraj Bhala, Krishnarajah Niranthara Kumar, Darren Wooldridge, Jan Hoogewerf, John Williams
Future Hosp J Oct 2017, 4 (3) 220-221; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.4-3-220
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Conflicts of interest
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early applications of ChatGPT in medical practice, education and research
  • Valproate induced carnitine deficiency and hyperammonaemia
  • ChatGPT in medical practice, education and research: malpractice and plagiarism
Show more Letters to the editor

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2023 by the Royal College of Physicians