Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Medical referrals: introducing a GP-priority clerking shift to ensure equitable patient care

Jennifer Holland and Yazeed Abed El-Khaleq
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.5-1-37
Future Healthc J February 2018
Jennifer Holland
AMinistry of Defence Hospital Unit, Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, UK
Roles: foundation year two trainee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jennyholland100@hotmail.com
Yazeed Abed El-Khaleq
BAcute Medical Unit, Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, UK
Roles: core medical trainee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    The current rotated hours for medical clerking junior doctors on weekdays. The grey square illustrates the shift which has been changed to a ‘GP priority’ clerking shift, when most GP-referred patients will arrive at the hospital.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Figures showing the time taken for (i) initial clerking and (ii) consultant post take. (a) Compares assessments between GP- and ED-referred patients for both audit cycles. (b) Compares assessments between audit cycles for both referral source. ED = Emergency Department

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Patient referral demographics between audit cycles

    Patient demographicsAudit cycle oneAudit cycle twop-value95% CI
    Total8585
    Excluded *930.072–0.009 to 0.157
    Complete missing data(7)(0)
    Other referral source (clinic, hospital transfers)(2)(1)
    Number suitable for analysis7682
    Full data available(64)(74)
    Incomplete data available
     Initial clerking time only(6)(1)
     Consultant review only(6)(7)
    Referral source0.293–0.062 to 0.199
    ED61 (80.3%)60 (73.2%)
    GP15 (19.7%)22 (26.8%)
    Day of referral0.0020.081 to 0.365
    Weekday41 (53.9%)63 (76.8%)
    Weekend35 (46.1%)19 (23.2%)
    Time of referral0.215–0.0559 to 0.247
    In hours37 (48.7%)48 (58.5%)
    Out of hours39 (51.3%)34 (41.5%)
    • ↵*Complete missing data: both initial clerking and consultant review times missingED = Emergency Department

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Time taken for initial clerking and consultant review, comparing ED and GP-referred patients for both audit cycles (average) time taken is displayed as median [lower quartile, upper quartile] or mean ± standard deviation)

    ED referralsGP referralsp-value95% CI
    Audit cycle one
    Initial clerkingWithin 4 hours90.9% (n=50)60.0% (n=9)0.0090.10 to 0.64
    Average time taken1h47m [52min, 2h38 min]3h6min ± 1h47min0.023+9min to +2h3min
    Consultant reviewIn recommended time87.5% (n=49)50% (n=7)0.0050.12 to 0.62
    Average time taken6h35min [2h54min, 10h29min]10h36min [3h44min, 17h48min]0.094–1h6min to +7h54min
    Audit cycle two
    Initial clerkingWithin 4 hours84.9% (n=45)95.5% (n=21)0.573–0.082 to 0.231
    Average time taken1h30min [55min, 2h25min]1h36min [49min, 2h13min]0.800–1h22min to +48min
    Consultant reviewIn recommended time88.3% (n=53)90.5% (n=19)0.573–0.181 to 0.147
    Average time taken4h48min [1h59min,12h27min]3h21min [2h18min, 5h25min]0.530–33min to +4h23min
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Time taken for initial clerking and consultant review, comparing cycle one and two

    Audit cycle oneAudit cycle twop-value95% CI
    Initial clerking% seen in recommended time
    Total84.788.00.517–0.074 to +0.161
    ED90.984.90.555–0.074 to 0.188
    GP60.095.50.011+0.089 to +0.600
    Average time taken
    Total2h5min [56min,3h4min]1h30min [50min,2h15min]0.107–24min to +56min
    ED only1h47min [52min,2h38min]1h30min [55min,2h25min]0.557–31min to +40min
    GP only3h6min ± 1h47min1h36min [49min,2h13min]0.017–25min to +2h27min
    Consultant review% seen in recommended time
    Total80.388.90.130–0.023 to +0.217
    ED87.588.30.223–0.111 to +0.142
    GP50.090.50.009+0.083 to +0.639
    Average time taken
    Total6h45min [3h11min,11h9min]3h55min [2h17min,11h14min]0.086–31min to +3h9min
    ED6h35min [2h55min,10h29min]4h48min [1h59min,12h27min]0.623–1h54min to +1h49min
    GP10h36min [3h44min,17h48min]3h21min [2h19min,5h25min]0.01+1h59min to +9h46min
    • ED = Emergency Department

Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Medical referrals: introducing a GP-priority clerking shift to ensure equitable patient care
Jennifer Holland, Yazeed Abed El-Khaleq
Future Healthc J Feb 2018, 5 (1) 37-42; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-1-37

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Medical referrals: introducing a GP-priority clerking shift to ensure equitable patient care
Jennifer Holland, Yazeed Abed El-Khaleq
Future Healthc J Feb 2018, 5 (1) 37-42; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-1-37
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A comparison of in-person versus telephone consultations for outpatient hospital care
  • Ward-based learning in a pandemic: an approach to ensuring sustainable medical education for healthcare students
  • Physician associate graduates in England: a cross-sectional survey of work careers
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians