Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Factors affecting individual task prioritisation in a workplace setting

Sophie Middleton, Alexandra Charnock, Sarah Forster and John Blakey
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-s114
Future Healthc J March 2019
Sophie Middleton
AAintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandra Charnock
AAintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Forster
BUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Blakey
CHealth Service Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Aims

This review aimed to identify the factors influencing task prioritisation in a workplace setting using existing literature both from healthcare and other professions.

Methods

The following databases were searched for relevant studies: British Nursing Index, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. The literature search used the following terms (including British English and American English spellings) ‘task prioritisation’ and ‘task management’. The reference lists of relevant articles and review papers were also searched to identify further studies and a Google Scholar search was undertaken. Data were extracted from the studies using a pro forma which included author, title and date of publication; study population; study objectives; study intervention and study outcome.

Results

Twenty relevant papers were identified from a wide range of fields including management, aviation and healthcare. Task prioritisation ability differed across individuals and was associated with personality and experience. Tasks were generally prioritised based on length, urgency, importance, procedure and reward. The context and source of the task influenced prioritisation in a healthcare setting. Task notification intrusiveness improved task performance. In high-stress scenarios, people were more likely to choose shorter tasks with more immediate rewards. With practise, people become more efficient at task prioritisation. No studies studied task prioritisation involving multiple locations.

Conclusion

Most studies relating to task prioritisation were theoretical and outside the healthcare setting hence real world application is unclear. The principles discovered include individual, task and non-task related factors. Practical applications include undergraduate and postgraduate education, personalised task management software and intrusive notifications. Additional research is needed to assess the effects of such interventions in a healthcare setting.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Factors affecting individual task prioritisation in a workplace setting
Sophie Middleton, Alexandra Charnock, Sarah Forster, John Blakey
Future Healthc J Mar 2019, 6 (Suppl 1) 114; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-s114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Factors affecting individual task prioritisation in a workplace setting
Sophie Middleton, Alexandra Charnock, Sarah Forster, John Blakey
Future Healthc J Mar 2019, 6 (Suppl 1) 114; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-s114
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Aims
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • Conflict of interest statement
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Inaccessible back: frustration and misery of lonely patients
  • Methylation of somatostatin receptor 2 gene in neuroendocrine tumours as a predictor of tumour response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
  • Viral and other infections in community and primary hypothyroidism – cause or coincidence?
Show more Research and innovation

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians