Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Junior doctor-led clinical teaching for finals: a useful resource?

Aiesha Alexander, Patrick Elder, Isabelle Svahnström, Clara Farque and Oliver Putt
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-s126
Future Healthc J March 2019
Aiesha Alexander
AUniversity of Warwick, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Elder
AUniversity of Warwick, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabelle Svahnström
BUniversity Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clara Farque
BUniversity Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oliver Putt
BUniversity Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Aims

To investigate the effectiveness of near-peer mock tutorials as a tool to prepare final year medical students for their objective structured long examination record (OSLER) clinical exams.

Methods

A near-peer revision course was developed for final-year students at a medical school in the West Midlands to aid preparation for their OSLER clinical exams. Junior doctors recruited as volunteer teachers received training in the OSLER assessment method and how to give feedback. Cases were written by the authors to include common clinical scenarios. All final year students (n=150) were invited to participate, with 40 students being enrolled into the program. Weekly mock OSLER tutorials were taught by junior doctors in a classroom setting 3 months leading up to the exams. Pre- and post-teaching questionnaires were administered to students using a 10-point Likert scale format. There were also free-text questions for qualitative feedback. A two-tailed student’s t-test, carried out at the α = 0.05 level, was used to determine statistically significant differences in confidence pre- and post-course.

Results

Of the 40 attendees, 35 students (87.5%) completed feedback questionnaires. Responses to pre-course questions (n=31) highlighted that 61% did not feel prepared for the OSLER exam, mainly due to lack of opportunities to practice. Additionally, 10% of students did not feel confident in their history taking, with confidence also lacking in examination skills (25%) and answering viva-style questions (33%). Following the course, the majority of students (97.1%, n=35) stated they found the clinical tutorials a helpful way to learn, with 100% of students stating they felt better prepared for the final year OSLER exam following the teaching sessions. Students reported higher levels of confidence in their history taking (mean 6.67; standard deviation (SD) 1.38 vs mean 7.97; SD 1.54, t(62) = 3.75, p<0.05), examination skills (mean 5.29; SD 1.53 vs 7.31; SD 1.67, t(62) = 4.99, p<0.05) and answering viva style questions (mean 5; SD 1.57 vs 7.62; SD 1.64, t(62) = 6.46, p<0.05).

Conclusion

The benefits of near-peer learning are widely described in medical education research. This study demonstrated that classroom-based tutorials, delivered by junior doctors, significantly improved student confidence in preparation for all aspects of their final year OSLER exams. Our results suggest that junior doctor-led teaching is a useful resource for increasing learning opportunities available to students, and offers a valuable and feasible adjunct to faculty teaching.

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest to declare.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Junior doctor-led clinical teaching for finals: a useful resource?
Aiesha Alexander, Patrick Elder, Isabelle Svahnström, Clara Farque, Oliver Putt
Future Healthc J Mar 2019, 6 (Suppl 1) 126; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-s126

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Junior doctor-led clinical teaching for finals: a useful resource?
Aiesha Alexander, Patrick Elder, Isabelle Svahnström, Clara Farque, Oliver Putt
Future Healthc J Mar 2019, 6 (Suppl 1) 126; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-s126
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Aims
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • Conflict of interest statement
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Induction for foundation doctors: to what extent can face-to-face induction be replaced by Health Education England's national Doctors in Training induction e-learning?
  • Crash course in prescribing – an interactive case-based teaching for final year medical students
  • ‘This is my vocation; is it worth it?’ Why do core medical trainees break from training?
Show more Education, Training and Medical Professionalism

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians