Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Making handover better

Emily McNicholas
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-s57
Future Healthc J March 2019
Emily McNicholas
Royal College of Physicians chief registrar, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Aim

The handover process had been identified, by staff and the Care Quality Commission (CQC), as an area requiring improvement. As chief registrar, I was asked to identify problems with and to improve the on-call handover process within the medicine department.

Methods

An online survey was sent to all junior doctors participating in the on-call rota as well as nurse practitioners and coordinators from the hospital out of hours team. Questions were included about the timing, leadership, documentation, effectiveness and safety of the daily morning and evening handovers. The survey also asked respondents to suggest improvements to the handover process.

Results

The survey received 35 responses across different grades of staff. In general respondents were satisfied with evening handover, although only 37% felt it was standardised and consistent and 23% felt it was documented appropriately. Results for morning handover were less satisfactory. Only 41% felt that there was a formal handover meeting in the morning. Sixty-seven per cent had difficulties identifying the correct colleague to handover to and 56% felt that there was no standardisation.

In the free text responses, many respondents identified that there is no overlap between shifts in the morning and no embedded culture of a morning handover meeting. When asked for a preferred solution to this there was no overwhelming preference, but the largest percentage (33%) wanted the base ward specialties to send a representative to take handover on behalf of their wards. This was implemented in April 2018 and the survey repeated in June 2018. This survey received 26 responses and showed some improvement in opinions regarding morning handover; now 96% agreed there was a formal meeting although 41% still had difficulties identifying the correct colleague. The survey also identified that increased use of the trust's information technology system could now permit a computerised handover; 92% agreed that using this would be a meaningful improvement. Handover will be developed further to incorporate a computerised handover starting with the new cohort of doctors in August.

Conclusion

The survey confirmed the generally held belief that the handover process needed improvement in order to bring it into line with the RCP acute care toolkit 1 recommendations. It also helped to identify the most acceptable solutions to the problems presented by shift patterns, and guided continuous improvement within the handover process.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Making handover better
Emily McNicholas
Future Healthc J Mar 2019, 6 (Suppl 1) 57; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-s57

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Making handover better
Emily McNicholas
Future Healthc J Mar 2019, 6 (Suppl 1) 57; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-s57
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Aim
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • Conflict of interest statement
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Fracture Liaison Services in England and Wales, inequity of access and quality of care after a fragility fracture
  • The end of weak handover
  • Developing service delivery guidelines on acute medical emergencies: challenges and solutions
Show more Health Services and Policy

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians