Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Medical students raising concerns about staff members

Abhishek Kakkar and Damien Lynch
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s14
Future Healthc J June 2019
Abhishek Kakkar
East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damien Lynch
East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

Raising concerns is a fundamental responsibility of professional medical practice1 and plays an important role in ensuring patient, trainee, staff and organisational safety. The Francis Report2 and Bawa-Garba case highlight the importance of trainees being empowered to raise concerns.

Medical undergraduates are doctors in training. Education and training around raising concerns is a vital part of their professional development. Medical clinical educators (MCE) also act as role models for their students. There are occasions when MCE act unprofessionally. Anecdotal evidence suggests that there are barriers to medical students raising concerns in such instances. Very little is published about these perceived barriers. Lastly, there is little published experience around supporting undergraduate clinical educators dealing with concerns raised about them.

Aims

  • Obtain feedback from students and MCE about the current ‘raising concerns’ process at East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust (ELHT) Department of Undergraduate Education.

  • Identify features of a process to support students raising concerns.

  • Identify features of a process to ensure MCE support when a concern is raised about them.

  • Use the findings to develop an effective ‘raising concerns’ system for students and MCE alike, which is supportive and enables self-reflection and learning.

Methods

An anonymous online survey comprising multiple choice and white space questions was developed and sent to clinical students attending ELHT from Lancaster (LMS) and University of Central Lancashire (UCLan) medical schools, and ELHT MCE.

Questions related to barriers facing medical students when raising concerns about MCE and what the important features of a specific process would be. The responses were used to develop a specific ‘raising concerns – MCE’ flowchart to support students and educators. This was then implemented as a pilot.

Results and discussion

26/79 MCE responded (34% response rate). Five out of 26 were aware of incidents of concerns about staff members reported by medical students, of whom three were directly involved. Of the 66 medical students from UCLan and 84 from LMS, 49 responded (33%). Thirteen out of 49 were aware of, and seven were directly involved with, such incidents.

The results confirmed the findings of previous work on barriers facing students,3 namely fear of repercussions, undermining hierarchy, unsure of the process involved, and the perception that nothing would be done about it. There was scope for improvement in all cases that had arisen previously. Both MCE and students (92% and 96% respectively) agreed the need for a consistent and systematic process. The suggestions from both groups as to what features a proposed system should have were identical; namely it should be fair, timely, supportive and should incorporate feedback for both the student and the MCE.

Conclusion

Concerns raised about MCE must be dealt with promptly and sensitively in order for both parties to understand and reflect on the circumstances leading to that complaint. The process we developed was designed in response to feedback from students and MCE. It is timely, with an aim to deal with the issue within 2 weeks. To address student worries about how to raise a concern, issues with hierarchy and the possibility of repercussions, we created a clear, consistent and fair framework which supports both parties. To aid learning, understanding and self-reflection, the process incorporates detailed feedback for both parties. A further quality improvement project studying the usefulness of this new system is currently being developed.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. General Medical Council
    . Achieving good medical practice: ­guidance for medical students. Manchester: GMC, 2016. www.gmc-uk.org/Achieving_good_medical_practice_0816.pdf_66086678.pdf [Accessed 22 March 2019].
  2. ↵
    1. Francis R.
    Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust public inquiry. London: TSO, 2013. www.gov.uk/government/publications/report-of-the-mid-staffordshire-nhs-foundation-trust-public-inquiry [Accessed 22 March 2019].
  3. ↵
    1. Johnson L
    , Malik N, Gafson I, et al. Improving patient safety by enhancing raising concerns at medical school. BMC Med Educ 2018;18:171.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Medical students raising concerns about staff members
Abhishek Kakkar, Damien Lynch
Future Healthc J Jun 2019, 6 (Suppl 2) 14; DOI: 10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Medical students raising concerns about staff members
Abhishek Kakkar, Damien Lynch
Future Healthc J Jun 2019, 6 (Suppl 2) 14; DOI: 10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Aims
    • Methods
    • Results and discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Induction for foundation doctors: to what extent can face-to-face induction be replaced by Health Education England's national Doctors in Training induction e-learning?
  • Crash course in prescribing – an interactive case-based teaching for final year medical students
  • ‘This is my vocation; is it worth it?’ Why do core medical trainees break from training?
Show more Education, Training and Medical Professionalism

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians