Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Virtual clinics in the present – a predictor for the future?

Tina Parish, Maathu Ratnaraj and Tazeen J Ahmed
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s37
Future Healthc J June 2019
Tina Parish
ASt George's University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maathu Ratnaraj
ASt George's University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tazeen J Ahmed
BCroydon University Hospital, Croydon, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

There is great interest in non-face-to-face (F2F), internet or app based outpatient interaction at the moment. As these become established, we look at the non-F2F appointments already happening in telephone and virtual clinics in a busy urban rheumatology department. Here we look at the type of diagnoses dealt with in a non-F2F environment and potential outcomes from these non-F2F appointments.

Materials and methods

Data was collected from electronic (Cerner) patient records on 240 patients who had a virtual appointment in May 2018. The data was analysed using MS Excel 2010.

Results

Two hundred and forty patients had virtual appointments in 1 month; 121 (50.4%) were via telephone and 119 (49.6%) via patient letter; 34 (14.1%) patients had multiple virtual/telephone appointments; 129 (54%) were carried out by consultants, 78 (32%) by nurses and 33 (14%) by registrars; 37% had rheumatoid arthritis; 32 (13%) appointments lead to a prescription. Virtual appointments produced 44 referrals, including 18 to another specialty, 16 to physiotherapy and the rest to hand therapy or podiatry. Most patients had an F2F appointment before and after their virtual appointment in May 2018, one patient had died before having a second F2F appointment and 13 (5%) were discharged from their virtual appointment.

Conclusion

Consultants undertook the bulk of virtual clinics, and these appointments resulted in the majority of referrals and prescriptions. Virtual appointments reduce the waiting times for contact with a healthcare professional between appointments. Many patients had several virtual appointments between F2F appointments and this cohort may benefit from more scrutiny. Current technology already improves communication and leads to significant changes in patient care without requiring F2F appointments. Internet based and app based interaction should face the same scrutiny.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

The mean number of days between each type of appointment

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Virtual clinics in the present – a predictor for the future?
Tina Parish, Maathu Ratnaraj, Tazeen J Ahmed
Future Healthc J Jun 2019, 6 (Suppl 2) 37; DOI: 10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s37

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Virtual clinics in the present – a predictor for the future?
Tina Parish, Maathu Ratnaraj, Tazeen J Ahmed
Future Healthc J Jun 2019, 6 (Suppl 2) 37; DOI: 10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s37
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Conclusion
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Improving the care of inpatients who are homeless: why we need to ask ‘have you got somewhere safe to go when you leave hospital?’ and use the Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 ‘duty to refer’ process
  • The ‘CURE IT’ programme – introducing equity, removing barriers, and treating patients with hepatitis C close to home: the Queensland experience
  • A novel 2-week wait lung cancer pathway starting with a telephone consultation, with patient satisfaction survey results
Show more Health Services and Policy

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians