Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Transitional care intervention effects on mortality and healthcare utilisation: a systematic review of pragmatic trials

Shawn CW Ng, Yu H Kwan and Lian L Low
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s40
Future Healthc J June 2019
Shawn CW Ng
ADuke-NUS Medical School
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yu H Kwan
ADuke-NUS Medical School
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lian L Low
BSingapore General Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

Transitions in care for patients with chronic conditions are often complex, leading to increased mortality and healthcare utilisation. Systematic reviews on effectiveness of transitional care (TC) interventions are inconclusive and none to date have examined pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs) specifically. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of the components of TC interventions on mortality and healthcare utilisation.

Materials and methods

We conducted a systematic review to determine the effectiveness of TC interventions for patients suffering from one or more chronic diseases following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses criteria. RCTs were identified through PUBMED, Cochrane and EMBASE (1960–2018). Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, pragmatic scoring (using PRECIS-2 tool) and data extraction.

Results and discussion

Out of 13,918 articles, 37 pragmatic RCTs were reviewed. TC interventions improved mortality and/or hospital readmission in most of the articles (n=33). Education, structured telephone support and home visits were the most commonly used and were a demonstrably effective intervention. Case management and discharge planning however showed poor evidence of effecting positive health outcomes. Medication reconciliation, in contrast to reviews that studied non-pragmatic trials, also showed poor evidence for positive health outcomes. To our best knowledge, this is the first review that examined the effectiveness of TC interventions in pragmatic trials, demonstrating the difference that an analysis of pragmatic trials, as opposed to explanatory trials, can have on health outcomes.

Conclusion

TC interventions improve transitions of care and should be incorporated in discharge processes, especially education, telephone and/or home visit follow-ups. Case management, discharge planning and medicine reconciliation however should be applied with caution in designing future TC interventions. Additionally, future research into transitional care should take pragmatism into consideration to better inform policymakers and clinicians on its real world effects.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Transitional care intervention effects on mortality and healthcare utilisation: a systematic review of pragmatic trials
Shawn CW Ng, Yu H Kwan, Lian L Low
Future Healthc J Jun 2019, 6 (Suppl 2) 40; DOI: 10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s40

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Transitional care intervention effects on mortality and healthcare utilisation: a systematic review of pragmatic trials
Shawn CW Ng, Yu H Kwan, Lian L Low
Future Healthc J Jun 2019, 6 (Suppl 2) 40; DOI: 10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s40
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results and discussion
    • Conclusion
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Improving the care of inpatients who are homeless: why we need to ask ‘have you got somewhere safe to go when you leave hospital?’ and use the Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 ‘duty to refer’ process
  • The ‘CURE IT’ programme – introducing equity, removing barriers, and treating patients with hepatitis C close to home: the Queensland experience
  • A novel 2-week wait lung cancer pathway starting with a telephone consultation, with patient satisfaction survey results
Show more Health Services and Policy

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians