Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Medical workforce review using the RCP guidance on safe medical staffing demonstrating wide variation of workload to workforce ratio between medical teams within a single trust

Thomas Weetman, Deanne Bell, Gareth Watts and Fang En Sin
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s44
Future Healthc J June 2019
Thomas Weetman
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deanne Bell
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gareth Watts
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fang En Sin
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) published guidance on safe medical staffing in 2018.1 Its recommendations were derived by estimating the workload generated by each clinical activity.

In our trust, there is a perception of a high junior doctor workload and an imbalance of workload between teams, which can compromise patient safety, work efficiency and training quality. Acting on this, we aim to:

  • compare the workload per tier 1 (pre-registrar) doctor between medical teams

  • compare the trust's tier 1 staffing level against the RCP benchmark, focusing on staffing of medical wards in-hours.

Methods

Twenty medical teams across Brighton and Sussex University Healthcare Trust (encompassing two hospitals) were assessed.

The clinical activity of each team (number of new and pre-existing inpatients, and discharges) was collected over a 2-week period using inpatient lists and electronic data. Workload was calculated as ‘average hours of work required per week per team’ based on estimations in the RCP report.

In calculating the average hours of ward work contributed by each tier 1 doctor per week, on-call commitments were accounted for, in addition to leave entitlements.

With this data, we then:

  • determined the ratio of workload to workforce per team, and compared between teams

  • compared the number of doctors needed as per the RCP guidance with actual staffing levels.

To help validate the guidance, we assessed additional hours worked using exception reports and diary cards from tier 1 doctors for 1 week.

Results

The average number of inpatients per team per day was 23 (range 3–51), with four new patients (0–13) and two discharges (0–6). The average hours of weekly ward work per team was 55.6 (6.4–88.3), with 5.4 doctors per team, each contributing 28.8 hours of ward presence a week.

The normalised workload to workforce ratio demonstrated a wide variation, ranging from 0.24 to 1.7 (with 1.0 representing the median; Fig 1). The average workload to workforce ratio was higher at PRH (1.3) than RSCH (1.0).

Fig 1:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1:

Variation in normalised workload to workforce ratio between medical teams within the trust, with 1.0 being the median

Overall, there was more than the recommended number of doctors (average actual:recommended ratio 1.9). Despite meeting the minimum staffing requirement of the RCP, staff are routinely working beyond contracted hours. A total of 77 hours were exception reported in 1 month, and the ‘diary card’ reported a total of 30.4 hours of extra work in 1 week.

Possible explanations include: staff and system inefficiencies; mismatch of workload to staffing level due to variations in workload and rota management; high workload from high acuity and complex patients. In addition, the hours of ward presence did not account for staff breaks and mandatory teaching.

Conclusion

The RCP guidance forms a basis for trusts to benchmark their workforce. We demonstrated the importance of regular reviews of medical staff distribution, in order to ensure safe, efficient delivery of care. The guidance stipulates a minimally safe staffing level; however the reality of maintaining a progressive care system may necessitate more doctors. The RCP recognises that the report is ‘the start of an ongoing process’, and we hope that our findings contribute to this process.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Royal College of Physicians
    . Guidance on safe medical staffing. Report of a working party. London: RCP, 2018. Available at: www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/safe-medical-staffing [Accessed 28 February 2019].
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Medical workforce review using the RCP guidance on safe medical staffing demonstrating wide variation of workload to workforce ratio between medical teams within a single trust
Thomas Weetman, Deanne Bell, Gareth Watts, Fang En Sin
Future Healthc J Jun 2019, 6 (Suppl 2) 44-45; DOI: 10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s44

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Medical workforce review using the RCP guidance on safe medical staffing demonstrating wide variation of workload to workforce ratio between medical teams within a single trust
Thomas Weetman, Deanne Bell, Gareth Watts, Fang En Sin
Future Healthc J Jun 2019, 6 (Suppl 2) 44-45; DOI: 10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s44
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • Reference
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Improving the care of inpatients who are homeless: why we need to ask ‘have you got somewhere safe to go when you leave hospital?’ and use the Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 ‘duty to refer’ process
  • The ‘CURE IT’ programme – introducing equity, removing barriers, and treating patients with hepatitis C close to home: the Queensland experience
  • A novel 2-week wait lung cancer pathway starting with a telephone consultation, with patient satisfaction survey results
Show more Health Services and Policy

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians