Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Safe medical staffing: a move towards modelling the medical workforce establishment in practice

Rhiannon Hughes, Benjamin Pope and Kiaran Flanagan
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s73
Future Healthc J June 2019
Rhiannon Hughes
*RCP chief registrar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Pope
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kiaran Flanagan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

In 2018, for the first time, the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) published guidance on safe medical staffing requirements.1 This included a benchmark of the number of hours required to provide care to medical inpatients from different tiers of clinicians. This led us, within North Bristol Trust’s (NBT) medical division to ask the question – do we have enough doctors?

Of note, in calculating the benchmark, the RCP guidance does not account for additional activities undertaken by Tier 1 clinicians, for example clinic requirements, and Tier 2 clinicians allocated to the ward, were estimated to be available 70% of the time, which at NBT was felt to be an underestimate.

As chief registrar, and collaborating with an internal analyst, we undertook a workforce modelling exercise, fundamentally based on the RCP guidance, but with refinements to account for our obligation to protect time required for training as per GMC recommendations.2

Materials and methods

Analysis of the on-call rosters identified hours rostered for ward work. In agreement with RCP guidance, predictable absences were calculated, plus an allowance for sickness (5 days per person).

Information was collated from the postgraduate education department regarding teaching hours and clinic requirements, and specialty registrars were surveyed regarding time necessary for specific training requirements. This was corroborated using to JRCPTB decision aids.3

Medical staffing provided information on posts and vacancies.

This data was then compared to the RCP guidance of recommended hours required to provide inpatient care, according to our bed base and patterns of working.

Results and discussion

Overall from the current posts the model calculated that across the Tier 1 workforce there is an additional 517 hours per week and in Tier 2 there is a deficit of 343 hours from the minimum RCP benchmark. Excluding vacant posts results in Tier 1 having an additional 110 hours, and a Tier 2 deficit of 366 hours (See Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Tier 1 and Tier 2 variance from benchmark time required for safe ward staffing

While accounting for additional training requirements, according to this model, there are sufficient posts in Tier 1 to meet the RCP benchmark for ward staffing in hours. However, at Tier 2 the numbers of posts do not meet the benchmark. If the model had used the more conservative figure provided by the RCP for Tier 2 staff unavailability, rather than the figure estimated from surveying current registrars, it remains under-established, at -200 hours per week. There is likely to be compensation from Tier 1 staff (eg CT2s), and from Tier 3 cover, to support Tier 2 workload.

Conclusion

This work enhances the understanding of the medical workforce establishment, as the model gives a more accurate estimation of our requirements. Prior to undertaking this exercise we had hypothesised that we needed to create additional posts in Tier 1 workforce. However, this work has changed our focus within the division, onto strategies for expansion of Tier 2 posts while improving recruitment to existing posts at Tier 1.

Future work is required to adapt the model to evaluate workforce at the specialty level and evaluate out-of-hours cover.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. General Medical Council
    . National training surveys 2018: Initial findings report. London: GMC, 2018. www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/dc11391-nts-2018-initial-findings-report_pdf-75268532.pdf [Accessed January 2019].
  2. ↵
    1. Joint Royal College of Physicians Training Board
    . ARCP decision aids. London: JRCPTBwww.jrcptb.org.uk/training-certification/­arcp-­decision-aids.
  3. ↵
    1. Royal College of Physicians
    . Guidance on safe medical staffing Report of a working party. London: RCP, 2018.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Safe medical staffing: a move towards modelling the medical workforce establishment in practice
Rhiannon Hughes, Benjamin Pope, Kiaran Flanagan
Future Healthc J Jun 2019, 6 (Suppl 2) 73-74; DOI: 10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s73

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Safe medical staffing: a move towards modelling the medical workforce establishment in practice
Rhiannon Hughes, Benjamin Pope, Kiaran Flanagan
Future Healthc J Jun 2019, 6 (Suppl 2) 73-74; DOI: 10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s73
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results and discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Watchpoint: an NHS-grown electronic communication system shown to improve patient safety
  • A quality improvement project on improving the compliance of ‘oxygen prescription with target saturations’ in a district general hospital
  • Therapies in ACS: the pitfalls of prescribing
Show more Quality Improvement and Patient Safety

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians