Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Update from RCP Quality Improvement: Improving improvement through practice, learning and research

John Dean
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.QI-7-1
Future Healthc J February 2020
John Dean
Royal College of Physicians
Roles: Clinical director of quality improvement and patient safety
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

The most cited article from Future Healthcare Journal is Mary Dixon Woods’ paper ‘Does quality improvement improve quality’.1 The conclusion of this article, her Harveian lecture and the recent BMJ paper is that it depends how it's done, and we need better research.2,3 So we need to improve how we do improvement, both now and in the future.

Being rigorous but inclusive with a method

What do we mean by quality improvement (QI)? There is no single definition. The Health Foundation states that quality improvement ‘aim[s] to bring about a measurable improvement by applying specific methods within a healthcare setting ... [with] common approaches used to improve quality’.4 Batalden and Davidoff describe the key elements of quality improvement as understanding systems, processes, variation and context, and then developing new knowledge by testing and adapting planned changes, while measuring the effect over time.5 This needs to happen in a culture of learning as teams and organisations.

Many individuals make valiant efforts to improve quality by changing processes of care, but without applying a ‘method’. If we look at the parallel with clinical practice we may change our clinical practice over time, based on context and experience but it is still grounded in core clinical methods. It is essential that individuals and teams understand and develop the skills of a basic improvement method, as they would with a clinical method. This can be understood in a classroom but is learned though application. Organisations will base their quality improvement training and practice on a core method such as the Model for improvement, Lean and Six Sigma. The main elements as described by Batalden and Davidoff should be present in whichever method is used. Most improvement practitioners have learned through practice and experience that it is necessary to add elements of other methods to their core method.

Skills to do core methods come with experience and practice, so working in teams supported by QI experts is important. Even seemingly basic methods like process mapping; plan, do, study, act; and time series measurement are not easy to do well.6,7

Understanding the system

If clinicians see a problem, we try to find a quick fix to it. Commonly, solutions are tested before the problem is understood in quality improvement projects. Spending time understanding the system in which the problem has arisen, and how it's working to produce this result is vital. This needs to explore people, behaviours, attitudes, functions, processes, variation and influencing factors. Then and only then can we build the right team to set an aim and test a hypothesis of what may result in improvement.

Better measurement and evaluation

Testing and adapting changes before we have a measurement plan in place is also a common problem. That's because measurement of how a system is working is difficult. Working more closely with measurement experts will help. The expertise of healthcare analysts are underused in healthcare improvement. Using qualitative measurement is as important as quantitative measures, yet how we capture staff or patient experience or measure culture is not well developed for quality improvement projects and programmes. We should be learning from health services research and organisational development. Evaluating the process and experience of doing quality improvement is also important so that we can adapt it and improve it in the future. This should be a feature of any publications on improvement projects or programmes as stated in SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines.8

Embedded in a quality management system

To improve and maintain quality, quality improvement approaches are not enough. These must sit as part of a quality management system that includes quality assurance/control, quality planning and quality improvement all joined together around a programme of priorities, skill development and a culture that enables and celebrates learning and leadership by all. This means it's embedded in how the organisation works and that all departments support the programmes.9

Spread and adaptation rather than new approaches

Developing new local approaches to delivering health and care is commonly the focus of improvement programmes, despite the fact that all over the country, world or even in other departments in the same organisation changes have been made that have demonstrated improvement. So, spreading and adapting good practice should perhaps be our focus, and may have more rapid impact. Our mechanisms for sharing practice need to improve, and professional organisations including royal colleges must be doing that. Equal focus should be on removing the barriers to spreading the changes, and ensuring they are contextualised to local systems.

Continuing to explore and develop

The Q community is a network of 3,000 people who are active in health and care improvement across the UK, they all see the need to improve improvement. In the recent Q exchange funded programmes there was particular emphasis on working more effectively with patients, behavioural aspects of change, creating more effective networks and integrating methods from other disciplines. There are similar networks of innovators and researchers all aiming to improve the delivery of healthcare. Connecting these different tribes who have the same aims, and sometimes similar methods, will improve improvement through learning, understanding and enabling spread.

The Royal College of Physicians' Quality Improvement programme aims to be at the forefront of improving improvement by sharing good practice, supporting and learning with teams delivering improvement and working with others to develop better and more rigorous methods. Publication of new practice and good practice that can be spread, and learning from doing improvement even when it hasn't been successful will be enabled through Future Healthcare Journal.

  • © 2020 Royal College of Physicians

References

  1. ↵
    1. Dixon-Woods M
    , Martin GP. Does quality improvement improve quality? FHJ 2016;3:191–4.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Dixon-Woods M
    . Harveian Oration 2018: Improving quality and safety in healthcare. Clin Med 2019;19:47–56.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Dixon-Woods M
    . How to improve healthcare improvement – an essay by Mary Dixon-Woods. BMJ 2019;367:l5514.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. The Health Foundation
    . Quality improvement made simple: What everyone should know about health care quality improvement. London: The Health Foundation; 2013.
  5. ↵
    1. Batalden PB
    , Davidoff F. What is ‘quality improvement’ and how can it transform healthcare? Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:2–3.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Jun GT
    , Ward J, Morris Z, Clarkson J. Health care process modelling: which method when? Int J Qual Health Care 2009;21:214–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Taylor MJ
    , McNicholas C, Nicolay C, et al. Systematic review of the application of the plan–do–study–act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:290–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Ogrinc G
    , Davies L, Goodman D, et al. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25:986–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Care Quality Commission
    . Quality improvement in hospital trusts: Sharing learning from trusts on a journey of QI. Newcastle: CQC; 2018.
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Update from RCP Quality Improvement: Improving improvement through practice, learning and research
John Dean
Future Healthc J Feb 2020, 7 (1) 6-7; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.QI-7-1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Update from RCP Quality Improvement: Improving improvement through practice, learning and research
John Dean
Future Healthc J Feb 2020, 7 (1) 6-7; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.QI-7-1
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Being rigorous but inclusive with a method
    • Understanding the system
    • Better measurement and evaluation
    • Embedded in a quality management system
    • Spread and adaptation rather than new approaches
    • Continuing to explore and develop
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Update from RCP Quality Improvement: Improvement opportunities and challenges in going digital and distant
  • Update from RCP Quality Improvement: Bringing together the experts to improve services
Show more Update

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2020 by the Royal College of Physicians