Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Including medical students in quality improvement projects in primary care

Luamar Dolfini, Gabriella Williamson and Pippa Oakeshott
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2019-0049
Future Healthc J June 2020
Luamar Dolfini
ASt George's, University of London, London, UK
Roles: medical student
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m1503711@sgul.ac.uk
Gabriella Williamson
BSt George's, University of London, London, UK
Roles: medical student
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pippa Oakeshott
CSt George's, University of London, London, UK
Roles: professor of general practice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

ABSTRACT

We share our experience as medical students who have recently completed quality improvement projects in primary care. We have found that quality improvement projects, such as audits, are mutually beneficial for clinicians who may need to conduct annual appraisals and students who benefit from the educational experience.

KEYWORDS:
  • Students
  • primary care
  • education
  • audit

The October 2019 edition of the Future Healthcare Journal focused on education.1 This included the successful quality improvement project by Dormandy et al on increasing the use of the 4AT delirium screening tool.2

We would like to share our experience of a medical student quality improvement project in primary care. In response to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for sepsis assessment in children published in 2013, we completed an audit cycle investigating the assessment of children aged <5 years presenting with fever (>37.5°C) at an inner-city general practice.3

Investigating febrile illness is important as early recognition of sepsis reduces mortality and morbidity.4 The 2013 NICE guideline outlines four signs that should be recorded: temperature, pulse, respiratory rate and capillary refill time (CRT).3

Our first audit in 2018 looked at general practitioners' compliance by analysing the computerised records of 111 consultations with feverish children from May 2014 – May 2018. Table 1 shows all four signs were recorded in only 11% (12/111) of all consultations.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Percentage of signs and symptoms recorded in audit 1 and audit 2

These results were presented to the general practitioners and practice nurses in a weekly clinical meeting in 2018. Not everyone was aware of the NICE guidelines. In addition, CRT was not a commonly used sign when the older clinicians were trained. Everyone agreed to improve recording of signs.

A re-audit was undertaken assessing 48 consecutive consultations from June 2018 – June 2019. Only 25% (12/48) of consultations had all four signs recorded, an overall improvement of just 14%.

These findings were presented again at a practice meeting in November 2019. Clinicians said the main reason for such a small improvement was probably that many febrile children seen by general practitioners are not particularly ill. If a child seemed well, was drinking, alert and active, they would not necessarily record all the signs, especially within the constraints of a 10-minute consultation. It would be different if the child was unwell and they were considering referral to paediatric emergency department.5 EMIS computerised general practitioner records now have a red ‘sepsis’ prompt which pops up if abnormal clinical signs, such as high fever and tachycardia, are recorded in a template.

As students, this was exciting as we were able to contribute to a change in clinical practice. Involving medical students in quality improvement projects can be mutually beneficial for clinicians who need audits for their annual appraisals and for students who benefit from the educational experience.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the doctors, nurses, staff and patients at the Curran practice, Manor Health Centre, London, UK.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Fox K
    . Education means learning what works and what doesn't. FHJ 2019;6:149–50.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Dormandy L
    , Mufti S, Higgins E, Bailey C, Dixon M. Shifting the focus: A QI project to improve the management of delirium in patients with hip fracture. FHJ 2019;6:215–9.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    . Fever in under 5s: assessment and initial management: Clinical guideline [CG160]. NICE, 2018. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg160
  4. ↵
    1. Gauer RL
    . Early recognition and management of sepsis in adults: the first six hours. Am Fam Physician 2013;88:44–53.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    . Fever in under 5s: assessment and initial management: NICE guideline [NG143]. NICE, 2019. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng143
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Including medical students in quality improvement projects in primary care
Luamar Dolfini, Gabriella Williamson, Pippa Oakeshott
Future Healthc J Jun 2020, 7 (2) 155-156; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2019-0049

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Including medical students in quality improvement projects in primary care
Luamar Dolfini, Gabriella Williamson, Pippa Oakeshott
Future Healthc J Jun 2020, 7 (2) 155-156; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2019-0049
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Gender balance in an unprecedented time
  • Learning from critical care: Improving intra- and inter-hospital transfer processes in enhanced care and the ward
Show more Opinion

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2020 by the Royal College of Physicians