Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Survey of the understanding and interest in the chief registrar scheme from doctors in an area of low uptake

Amy Davies and Philip Harvey
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2019-0064
Future Healthc J October 2020
Amy Davies
AUniversity Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
Roles: chief registrar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip Harvey
BSandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
Roles: chief registrar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: philipharvey@nhs.net
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Word cloud of free text responses to ‘What do you think the role [of chief registrar] involves?’ Free text responses that were more common are represented by larger font size. GMC = General Medical Council; QIP = quality improvement project; RCP = Royal College of Physicians; regs = registrars; SpR = specialist registrar.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Respondent grade

    Graden (%)
    ST3–ST572 (37.7)
    ST6 and above31 (16.2)
    Consultant74 (38.7)
    Other14 (7.3)
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Questions relating to applications for the role

    QuestionResponsen (%)
    Who can apply for the rolea,bOnly final-year SpRs39 (22.7)
    Only SpRs doing GIM as part of their training102 (59.3)
    Only SpRs with experience of ‘management’46 (26.7)
    Only SpRs with ambitions to be ‘senior medical leaders’68 (39.5)
    Would you be interested in applying for the roleaYes28 (17.3)
    No90 (55.6)
    Unsure44 (27.2)
    If not interested in applying for the role, what has influenced your decisiona,bMy trust of choice did not offer the role13 (10.7)
    I wasn't aware the role existed20 (16.5)
    I don't know what the role entails50 (41.3)
    Unlikely to be successful11 (9.1)
    It would harm my clinical training7 (5.8)
    Training programme director unsupportive4 (3.3)
    Would you prefer to do the role in programme or out of programmeaIn programme74 (68.5)
    Out of programme19 (17.6)
    Unsure or not interested15 (13.9)
    What information would you find usefula,bExamples of ‘a day in the life’ of a chief registrar92 (80)
    More information on the application process57 (49.6)
    Examples of skills developed as a chief registrar86 (74.8)
    More information on the training provided by the RCP65 (56.5)
    • ↵a = response rates to each question varied, therefore percentages vary between questions;

    • ↵b = questions permitted respondents to select multiple responses; GIM = general internal medicine; RCP = Royal College of Physicians; SpR = specialist registrar.

Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Survey of the understanding and interest in the chief registrar scheme from doctors in an area of low uptake
Amy Davies, Philip Harvey
Future Healthc J Oct 2020, 7 (3) 222-225; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2019-0064

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Survey of the understanding and interest in the chief registrar scheme from doctors in an area of low uptake
Amy Davies, Philip Harvey
Future Healthc J Oct 2020, 7 (3) 222-225; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2019-0064
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions and future recommendations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • To scan or not to scan – D-dimers and computed tomography pulmonary angiograms in the era of COVID-19
  • The effects of COVID-19 on sickness of medical staff across departments: A single centre experience
  • National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) to identify inpatient COVID-19 deterioration: a retrospective analysis
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians