Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Who should develop massive open online courses (MOOCs) for undergraduate medical education?

David McMaster, Catherine Santucci and Munashe Veremu
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.Let-7-3-3
Future Healthc J October 2020
David McMaster
University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK
Roles: Medical student
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Santucci
Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Victoria, Malta
Roles: Medical student
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Munashe Veremu
Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Victoria, Malta
Roles: Medical student
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Editor – The future of medical education is online and as the world restructures in the midst of this pandemic there is opportunity for this future to be expedited. As a group of medical students from the UK, we have seen great variation in the content of online education provided by medical schools, in lieu of normal teaching, to cater for students currently isolating at home. With the likelihood that online courses will become increasingly integrated into undergraduate medical education we believe there is a need for centralised development of high-quality learning resources.

Online education is not novel, with many medical schools already successfully incorporating methods of online teaching, such as the ‘flipped classroom’ model into their curricula.1 Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have the potential to become the ‘gold standard’ for delivering learning objectives through interactive online teaching and videos, recommended reading, discussion forums and automated assessments. Successful MOOCs already exist, as demonstrated by a joint project by the University of Dundee and British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC), who developed a MOOC to compensate for the lack of standardisation of undergraduate antimicrobial resistance and stewardship teaching.2

Medical school curricula are developed locally around core competencies set by the General Medical Council (GMC), leading to inevitable variation.3 We propose that MOOCs should be designed by professional bodies, such as the royal colleges and national societies (eg BSAC), which are actively involved in creating guidelines, setting assessments and developing training pathways for specialty trainees. Developing an effective MOOC requires establishing a central curriculum, identifying a target audience and creating relevant content.4 Now is the time for these groups to assemble expert panels, decide upon competencies and repurpose existing online content or create novel resources.

Medical education is a combination of theory and practical experience, with a great deal of learning condensed into a short period of time. While not all learning can take place online, by moving traditional time-consuming theory-based teaching online there is potential to increase time spent in the clinical environment, arguably the most important part of developing future clinicians. Enabling the best possible learning experience for students requires accessible online resources developed by expert groups. Now is the time to identify the professional bodies best suited to develop MOOCs and encourage them to deliver the future of undergraduate medical education.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Prober CG
    , Heath C. Lecture halls without lectures – a proposal for medical education. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1657–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Sneddon J
    , Barlow G, Bradley S, et al. Development and impact of a massive open online course (MOOC) for antimicrobial stewardship. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018;73:1091–7.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. General Medical Council
    . Outcomes for graduates. GMC, 2020. www.gmc-uk.org/education/standards-guidance-and-curricula/standards-and-outcomes/outcomes-for-graduates/outcomes-for-graduates [Accessed 12 June 2020].
  4. ↵
    1. Pickering JD
    , Henningsohn L, DeRuiter MC, de Jong PGM, Reinders MEJ. Twelve tips for developing and delivering a massive open online course in medical education. Med Teach 2017;39:691–6.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Who should develop massive open online courses (MOOCs) for undergraduate medical education?
David McMaster, Catherine Santucci, Munashe Veremu
Future Healthc J Oct 2020, 7 (3) e33-e34; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.Let-7-3-3

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Who should develop massive open online courses (MOOCs) for undergraduate medical education?
David McMaster, Catherine Santucci, Munashe Veremu
Future Healthc J Oct 2020, 7 (3) e33-e34; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.Let-7-3-3
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The association of pleural effusion and pulmonary embolism
  • What is the impact of COVID-19 on complaints against doctors?
  • The significance of the gut microbiome in post-COVID-19 gastrointestinal symptoms
Show more Letters to the editor

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians