Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Senior oversight of rapid TTO and information exchange (SORTIE) discharge letter: a pilot evaluation

David Eveson, Chris Miller, Amin Amin, Mark Taylor and Abigail Lawrence
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.7.1.s30
Future Healthc J February 2020
David Eveson
AUniversity Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Miller
AUniversity Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amin Amin
AUniversity Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Taylor
AUniversity Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abigail Lawrence
AUniversity Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

Organising timely hospital discharge can be a challenge. In this hospital trust, a perceived barrier is delay in generating a TTO (‘to take out’ or discharge summary) letter. There are further steps dependent on this correspondence that must be undertaken before leaving hospital, including pharmacy check of discharge medication, dispensary, arranging transport, nurse sign-off and additional correspondence (eg anticoagulant handover). Projects to facilitate opportune TTO writing have met with limited success: principal barriers being precedence of clinical work, continuity of care at junior doctor level and unwieldy templates (a standard stroke discharge template comprises over 30 mandatory fields). A group of consultant physicians wished to evaluate an abbreviated TTO template, SORTIE (senior oversight of rapid TTO and information exchange) which was to be co-authored by the consultant at the point hospital discharge was indicated on clinical grounds. It would consist of a set of minimum required headings, allowing for a narrative summary to be written comprising information deemed to be necessary for the effective handover of care.

Materials and methods

We did a prospective before (Phase 1: 05 August 2019 to 13 September 2019) versus after (Phase 2: 18 September to 11 October 2019) study of the use of the SORTIE template on two acute medical wards (stroke medicine and geriatric medicine) involving three consultants. On the stroke medicine ward, SORTIE letters were written immediately after the morning board round for patients who could leave hospital that day, and on the geriatrics ward, junior doctors commenced the letter on admission and it was finalised by the consultant. Process data (to include time of discharge and length of stay) were compiled from hospital audit systems. Qualitative feedback from care providers, service users and carers/relatives was sought by listing the consultant mobile phone number on the template with an explanation that this was a pilot evaluation. The effect on pharmacy services and medical coding was included.

Results and discussion

Quantitative data from the study are shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Quantitative data on the impact of SORTIE

Regarding qualitative data, junior doctors reported being more enthusiastic and engaged in writing TTOs and appreciated the freer-form nature of the template. One phone call was received from a relative praising its user-friendly nature. One care provider commented how poor quality the TTO was in Phase 1. Having a pharmacist present when the consultant generated the discharge medication list appeared to reduce the chance of prescribing errors.

Conclusion

This pilot evaluation appeared to demonstrate a beneficial effect of an abbreviated, consultant-led TTO document on timelier hospital discharge and was generally accepted by hospital staff and service users. A full statistical analysis is to be carried out and we plan a broader and lengthier evaluation.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Senior oversight of rapid TTO and information exchange (SORTIE) discharge letter: a pilot evaluation
David Eveson, Chris Miller, Amin Amin, Mark Taylor, Abigail Lawrence
Future Healthc J Feb 2020, 7 (Suppl 1) s30; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.7.1.s30

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Senior oversight of rapid TTO and information exchange (SORTIE) discharge letter: a pilot evaluation
David Eveson, Chris Miller, Amin Amin, Mark Taylor, Abigail Lawrence
Future Healthc J Feb 2020, 7 (Suppl 1) s30; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.7.1.s30
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results and discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Conflicts of interest
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Educating non-cardiologists improves the initial management of patients with non-ST elevated myocardial infarction
  • Intravenous fluid prescribing for medical inpatients: are we getting it right?
  • Improving the quality of kidney transplant recipient discharge summaries
Show more Quality Improvement and Patient Safety

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians