Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Introducing a formal night-to-morning handover on the acute medical unit Princess Royal University Hospital (PRUH)

Amanda Mootoo and Harry Wright
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.7.1.s56
Future Healthc J February 2020
Amanda Mootoo
AKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harry Wright
AKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Background

Handover allows responsibility for immediate and continued care to be transferred between healthcare professionals. The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death and the Royal College of Physicians identified handover as a high-risk step of the patient pathway.1 Thus, lack of handover such as that at Princess Royal University Hospital (PRUH) is a major preventable cause of patient harm and critical to patient safety.

Aim

The aim was to develop a formal, structured AMU night-to-morning handover, to enable safe recognition and handover of unstable and unwell patients, and to highlight priority tasks and specialty referrals.

Method: Defining the problem

A qualitative questionnaire was sent to all PRUH acute medical unit (AMU) junior doctors and consultants via online survey.

100% of respondents defined current handover practice as unsafe and 100% identified need for morning handover. Handing over unwell patients in a timely and reliable manner to relevant team was raised as a primary issue. A 15-minute (100%) morning handover, led by registrars (80%) involving night and day junior doctors (95%) and AMU consultants (75%) was felt best placed to address the issue.

Cycle 1

Interventions

Introduction of daily verbal and written handover using a formatted whiteboard, which identified all staff members, highlighted any unwell patients, priority tasks and potential staffing issues.

Use of a consultant cue-card to standardise the handover.

Feedback

Informal verbal feedback post cycle 1 – highlight overnight adverse incidents, hospital operational concerns and giving a learning point of the day to morning team.

Cycle 2

Interventions

Improved visual clarity of whiteboard and development of laminated handover cue-cards produced and printed to guide succinct handover delivery by night team.

Remeasure

Repeat online survey re-sent to all junior doctors and consultants on AMU 6 months post cycle 2 interventions. Overall positive response to introduction of AMU morning handover: 90% agreed new handover safely identifies unwell patients to day team; 50% improvement in handing over to the relevant team; 40% suggested an electronic handover would be useful.

Cycle 3

Development of an electronic handover request. This provides formal electronic log of handover, enables night team to document accurate details to aid morning handover.

Sustainability

We plan to repeat further cycles and re-assess interventions, to appoint a handover champion, to embed the handover within inductions, to collect feedback from consultants and to involve senior nursing staff and hospital managers.

Strengths and limitations

It enabled the introduction and implementation of a simple, cost-effective, formal AMU morning handover at PRUH that follows elements of the BMJ's ‘good handover’ practice. It has shown demonstrable improvement in addressing trainees’ concerns. It follows the structure of a quality improvement project and involved three cycles with interventions reviewed after each cycle. Direct impact on patient safety was not measured as it did not use patient safety outcome measures.

Conclusion

Handover should be a priority given it is a high-risk step in the patient pathway. This project achieved the introduction and sustainment of a standardised night-to-morning AMU handover, which has undoubtedly had a positive role in improving patient safety by more efficient handover of unwell patients and has addressed concerns of the healthcare team.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Royal College of Physicians
    . Acute care toolkit 1: Handover. London: RCP, 2011. www.rcplondon.ac.uk/guidelines-policy/acute-care-toolkit-1-handover [Accessed 14 March 2019].
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Introducing a formal night-to-morning handover on the acute medical unit Princess Royal University Hospital (PRUH)
Amanda Mootoo, Harry Wright
Future Healthc J Feb 2020, 7 (Suppl 1) s56-s57; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.7.1.s56

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Introducing a formal night-to-morning handover on the acute medical unit Princess Royal University Hospital (PRUH)
Amanda Mootoo, Harry Wright
Future Healthc J Feb 2020, 7 (Suppl 1) s56-s57; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.7.1.s56
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Background
    • Aim
    • Method: Defining the problem
    • Cycle 1
    • Cycle 2
    • Cycle 3
    • Conclusion
    • Conflicts of interest
    • Reference
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Changing the transmission-prevention strategy for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in an Iraqi prison: a quality improvement project
  • Enhancing teamwork to create a high-performance team in the acute stroke unit at Worcestershire Royal Hospital – quality improvement project
  • Steps to be taken to provide quality healthcare
Show more Quality improvement and patient safety

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians