Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Going for gold in COPD – a quality improvement project to reduce the inappropriate use of inhaled corticosteroids in the over 65s

Peter Robinson, Lucy Wicks and Andre Kuble
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.7.1.s67
Future Healthc J February 2020
Peter Robinson
ARoyal London Hospital, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucy Wicks
Bstudent physician associate, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andre Kuble
Ccore medical trainee, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are associated with increased rates of pneumonia, fracture, diabetes and mycobacterial infection in a dose dependent manner. They have limited short- and long-term benefit in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cessation of steroids in selected patients has been proven safe. We observed that a large number of patients in the geriatric population were prescribed steroids, and set out to describe the incidence of steroid inhaler prescription among elderly care inpatients; we then sought to optimise respiratory care within an elderly care department in a central London teaching hospital.

Method

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients discharged from a geriatric service over a 3-month period. Sequential discharges were assessed for the presence of inhaled therapies, the documented diagnosis and the proportion on inhaled therapies. After identifying high rates of inhaled therapy usage, we undertook a series of quality improvement interventions aimed at optimising respiratory care in these elderly patients. This included a guideline-based protocol for reviewing respiratory diagnoses and prescriptions.

Results

In the retrospective analysis, 67/297 (22.5%) patients were discharged on inhaled therapy; 55/67 (82%) were discharged on inhaled steroids, of which 20/67 (36%) were on high-dose equivalent (>1,000 μg equivalent beclomethasone); 1/67 of these patients had evidence of inhaled therapy review during admission; and 15/55 of these patients were given a discharge diagnosis of pneumonia while only 6/55 were admitted with an exacerbation of their chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Our preliminary data suggest that a single-paged protocol aimed at improving adherence to best practice lead to practice change; dose modification has occurred in 50% of patients on inhaled therapy, leading to a reduction in steroid burden and an annual reduction in prescription costs of £75 per patient reviewed.

Conclusion

By introducing measures to assist in the review and modification of inhaled therapies, we were able to change practice. The alteration in practice led to reduction in prescription costs, and a reduced burden of ICS. We propose that widespread encouragement of geriatrician-led respiratory review could lead to harm reduction and cost saving in the elderly.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Going for gold in COPD – a quality improvement project to reduce the inappropriate use of inhaled corticosteroids in the over 65s
Peter Robinson, Lucy Wicks, Andre Kuble
Future Healthc J Feb 2020, 7 (Suppl 1) s67; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.7.1.s67

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Going for gold in COPD – a quality improvement project to reduce the inappropriate use of inhaled corticosteroids in the over 65s
Peter Robinson, Lucy Wicks, Andre Kuble
Future Healthc J Feb 2020, 7 (Suppl 1) s67; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.7.1.s67
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • Conflicts of interest
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Telecommunication during COVID-19: a multicentre quality improvement project
  • Modernising the weekend medical handover
  • Medical handover QIP
Show more QUALITY IMPROVEMENT AND PATIENT SAFETY

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians