Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Fluid balance chart audit in a rural district general hospital

Oliver Cole and Georgina White
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.7.1.s82
Future Healthc J February 2020
Oliver Cole
ADorset County Hospital, Dorchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georgina White
ADorset County Hospital, Dorchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Background

Fluid balance charts are an important monitoring document for patient safety and clinical care. The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death report shows that inaccurate fluid balance monitoring impacts patient deaths in the perioperative period.1

Aims

Our audit aimed to assess accuracy, completeness and attitudes towards fluid balance charts including evidence of appropriate escalation when required.

Methods

This work is part of an ongoing audit conducted over an acute surgical and medical ward in a rural district general hospital. Two subsets of data were collected: questionnaire data on attitudes towards the fluid balance charts and a data set correlating bedside fluid charts with online electronic prescribing software and medical notes. Questionnaire data were collected over 5 days using paper questionnaires on the ward; 6 weeks later the second subset was collected using the physical fluid balance charts of 86 patients and we used an MS Excel tool to allow estimation and calculation of urine output.

Results

Despite high levels of confidence in using the charts, 68% of patients’ fluid balance charts did not accurately match their electronic prescribing record. Questionnaire data corresponded to chart data subsets with questionnaires indicating 40% of respondents did not know the hourly urine output at which to escalate. Seventy-seven per cent of patients had at least 1 hour where urine output was <30 mL, concordantly 73% of patients who had a weight recorded had at least 2 hours where urine output <0.5 mL/kg/hr. However only 12% of patients had their urine output escalated in medical notes; 60% of patients had an input, output or balance recorded; of those who had an overall balance recorded, 90% were inaccurate.

Conclusions

This audit demonstrated very poor compliance with, and accuracy of, fluid balance charts. Dangerously low urine outputs were not being escalated and acted upon. This has far reaching implications, not just for patient care but also for wider policy reviews given the pressurised ward environment becoming commonplace. Part of the problem is likely to be an excess of charts being used when no longer clinically indicated. Further education and changes to policy, attitudes and fluid balance chart design are required and ongoing. This includes formal teaching sessions, e-learning being developed, increasing ward awareness and potential policy changes including mandatory medical staff review of charts every 24–48hrs.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death
    . Themes and recommendations common to all hospital specialties. London: NCEPOD, 2018. www.ncepod.org.uk/CommonThemes/CommonThemes.pdf [Accessed 23 March 2019].
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Fluid balance chart audit in a rural district general hospital
Oliver Cole, Georgina White
Future Healthc J Feb 2020, 7 (Suppl 1) s82; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.7.1.s82

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Fluid balance chart audit in a rural district general hospital
Oliver Cole, Georgina White
Future Healthc J Feb 2020, 7 (Suppl 1) s82; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.7.1.s82
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Background
    • Aims
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Conflicts of interest
    • Reference
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Watchpoint: an NHS-grown electronic communication system shown to improve patient safety
  • A quality improvement project on improving the compliance of ‘oxygen prescription with target saturations’ in a district general hospital
  • Therapies in ACS: the pitfalls of prescribing
Show more Quality Improvement and Patient Safety

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians