Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

The representation of LGBTQ+ people in medical assessment and teaching scenarios

Emma Alexander, Ronan Lyne, Yousef Sasha Mottaghi-Taromssari and Isabel Lever
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.7.1.s87
Future Healthc J February 2020
Emma Alexander
APaediatric Liver, GI and Nutrition Centre and MowatLabs, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronan Lyne
BKing's College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yousef Sasha Mottaghi-Taromssari
BKing's College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabel Lever
BKing's College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

Examinations and teaching at UK medical schools are meant to be targeted towards common clinical scenarios faced by junior doctors in the NHS. This should include preparing students to provide equal treatment to groups with protected characteristics, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer+ (LGBTQ+) people. However, existing research has implied such groups face discrimination when receiving healthcare.1 This research project aims to:

  • explore whether LGBTQ+ people are adequately represented in assessment and teaching scenarios

  • explore whether medical students feel comfortable discussing sexuality in clinical scenarios

  • explore whether prejudiced attitudes towards LGBTQ+ people are present in medical settings.

Materials and methods

Participants were current medical students at all stages of training. Participants completed a survey on Google Forms in mid-2018, distributed on public forums (year group pages, MSA Newsletter). The questions were developed both with a Likert scale (1–5, where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree) and with free text space where applicable. The data analysis used descriptive statistics on the questionnaire responses. This study received minimal risk clearance (Reference MRS-17/18-8128 and MRS-17/18-8129).

Results and discussion

A total of 107 medical students participated. The majority (81%) attended one London-based medical school. The most common stage of training was in the final clinical year (38%). Overall, 72% of students had been taught using educational scenarios including LGBTQ+ people, but fewer remembered LGBTQ+ representation in OSCEs (21%) and written exams (29%). When asked whether LGBTQ+ people were adequately represented in assessments and teaching scenarios, the median response was 2 (disagree). When asked whether LGBTQ+ people most commonly appear in scenarios when the diagnosis is related to sexuality or sexually transmitted diseases, the median response was 4 (agree). Medical students were generally comfortable with discussing sexual orientation (median response 4 (agree)). Participants generally felt medical school was an accepting environment for LGBTQ+ people (median response 4 (agree)) but felt less confident about the NHS working environment (median response 3 (unsure)).

Conclusion

Our study shows there is limited overt representation of LGBTQ+ people in medical school teaching and assessment scenarios. Current representation predominantly focuses on sex/STD-related scenarios, which may encourage bias in the assessment of LGBTQ+ patients. This finding therefore has implications not only for patient care but also for the satisfaction and comfort of LGBTQ+ individuals undergoing medical training. Further work should be done to update curricula and examinations to ensure adequate representation of LGBTQ+ people at all stages.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Elliott MN
    , Kanouse DE, Burkhart Q, et al. Sexual minorities in England have poorer health and worse health care experiences: a national survey. J Gen Intern Med 2014;30:9–16.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The representation of LGBTQ+ people in medical assessment and teaching scenarios
Emma Alexander, Ronan Lyne, Yousef Sasha Mottaghi-Taromssari, Isabel Lever
Future Healthc J Feb 2020, 7 (Suppl 1) s87; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.7.1.s87

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The representation of LGBTQ+ people in medical assessment and teaching scenarios
Emma Alexander, Ronan Lyne, Yousef Sasha Mottaghi-Taromssari, Isabel Lever
Future Healthc J Feb 2020, 7 (Suppl 1) s87; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.7.1.s87
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results and discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Conflicts of interest
    • Reference
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Induction for foundation doctors: to what extent can face-to-face induction be replaced by Health Education England's national Doctors in Training induction e-learning?
  • Crash course in prescribing – an interactive case-based teaching for final year medical students
  • ‘This is my vocation; is it worth it?’ Why do core medical trainees break from training?
Show more Education, Training and Medical Professionalism

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians