Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Haematology morphology teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a UK teaching hospital experience

Sarah K Westbury and Andrew Stewart
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2020-0159
Future Healthc J March 2021
Sarah K Westbury
ABristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Roles: academic clinical lecturer in haematology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sarah.westbury@bristol.ac.uk
Andrew Stewart
BBristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
Roles: consultant haematologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

ABSTRACT

Postgraduate medical education faces ongoing disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, with specific challenges in providing training in laboratory medicine. We report an online approach that has enabled us to continue to deliver haematology morphology training in a teaching hospital setting. The method described is associated with high levels of participant satisfaction and could easily be adapted for use in other clinical pathology specialties.

KEYWORDS:
  • haematology
  • COVID-19
  • education
  • microscopy

Background

Training in blood and bone marrow cell morphology is an essential component of postgraduate haematology medical education. It is perceived as a challenging area in which to both obtain and maintain skills.1 Gaps in training rotas, the European Working Time Directive, subspecialty training and other logistical or staffing issues may all impact on the quantity and quality of morphology training available for haematology trainees.2 Here we describe our experiences of delivering haematology morphology teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic in a large UK NHS trust.

Problem

Postgraduate medical education has been significantly disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, both due to alterations in trainee working patterns and the need for social distancing in the workplace. Other healthcare systems that have previously been affected by disease epidemics have arguably been better prepared to deal with the impact on postgraduate training and have moved rapidly to incorporate online learning.3,4

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, morphology teaching at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust (UHBW) consisted of a weekly, hour-long teaching session regularly attended by training and non-training middle-grade haematology doctors. A small number of biomedical scientists and consultants with laboratory responsibilities also attended intermittently. Blood films, bone marrow aspirates and trephines were reviewed around a multiheaded (five-head) training microscope (EXC-500; Accu-Scope, Commack, USA) with a digital camera and large high-resolution screen to enable other participants in the laboratory to view the material simultaneously. This arrangement did not allow for adequate social distancing within the laboratory, and so morphology teaching was not possible even when clinical pressures had eased sufficiently to allow postgraduate education events to recommence.

Solution

Our solution to this was to redesign morphology training within UHBW using a remote, online teaching approach, with synchronous and asynchronous components. Synchronous teaching refers to teaching that participants experience at the same time but in a different place, while asynchronous teaching occurs at a different time and a different place for participants.5 This can also be combined with more traditional face-to-face training opportunities to produce a blended learning experience.6

Five days prior to the morphology teaching session, anonymised clinical material relating to one or two cases is circulated to participants via e-mail. This typically includes a clinical vignette and basic full blood count information in addition to between two and eight digital images of blood or marrow slides for examination. Images at different magnifications are selected that demonstrate the key morphological features of the case. Depending on the scenario, additional information such as flow cytometry plots, high performance liquid chromatography traces and cytogenetic or genomic results may also be included. Participants are asked to review this material (asynchronous component) prior to the weekly morphology teaching (synchronous component). The weekly synchronous teaching is delivered via Webex videoconferencing (Cisco, London, UK). Webex is used as it has full IT support from UHBW and is the same videoconferencing system as used for the virtual haematology pathology multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTs). The person leading the teaching session uses the screen share function to enable all participants to view the material, and participant interaction is possible either verbally or using the chat function for those without microphones. The teaching starts with a live review of the slides and other material sent out before considering previously unseen blood film and bone marrow slides, with participants taking turns to describe the morphological features, to suggest a diagnosis or differential diagnosis, and to identify what further tests would be indicated. During the synchronous teaching, participants see the same ‘view’ on their screen as the facilitator sees through the microscope. Participants are therefore able to direct the facilitator to navigate around the slide, focus on a particular cell or feature, or change objective lens. The images viewed on a computer or tablet in real time are clear and of comparable quality to what can be seen using the microscope, but participants joining via their mobile phone may have a less satisfactory experience due to screen size.

Results so far

The new teaching method has been well received by permanent staff and trainees at UHBW and resulted in two nominations for a UHBW Spotlight Award, recognising the beneficial impact of this virtual training. Feedback via free-text responses to semi-structured questions circulated by e-mail and in paper format has been universally positive from both training and non-training grade haematologists. Participation rates were higher for the remote teaching than they were for the face-to-face morphology teaching, with more biomedical scientists and clinical scientists attending, as well as higher attendance rates among the middle grade doctors. As participants can join from any location, we have particularly noticed an increase in attendance by those who work across multiple sites in the trust, those who work flexibly and those who work less than full time. Furthermore, individuals who are not in work due to COVID-19-specific issues (such as shielding and self-isolation) have still been able to participate in the teaching. Attendance numbers increased from an average of approximately seven participants for the pre-pandemic, in-person teaching to approximately 20 participants for the virtual teaching. Despite the increase in participant numbers, the sessions remain highly interactive. For the facilitators, the interactive nature of the teaching avoids the sensation of ‘teaching to the void’ that can accompany the delivery of online lectures or other larger group formats.

The main negative element identified so far with this approach is the increase in time required to prepare and deliver the teaching. Preparation of digital material for circulation in advance of each teaching session takes additional time but can be combined in some instances with preparation for MDTs or laboratory quality assurance exercises. Although there have been relatively few practical issues so far, the synchronous sessions work most smoothly when the facilitator leading the session has an assistant to help with monitoring the chat function, responding to queries or dealing with any technical problems. The key advantages and disadvantages of the virtual method described here are outlined in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

The major advantages and disadvantages of the online approach to morphology teaching

Further evaluation

As a result of participant feedback, the teaching session has been opened to all haematology trainees in the region in addition to UHBW trainees and staff. The remote morphology teaching described here has been delivered predominantly to haematology trainees and middle grades with some experience of microscope work and pre-existing morphology knowledge. The months of August and September see a number of new specialty trainees join the haematology training programme, and it will be important to ensure that the training is accessible and fit for purpose for those trainees with limited or no previous morphology experience. For these individuals, a blended approach to learning will be crucial to ensure they develop the necessary microscopy skills alongside recognition of any pathological findings. Clinical and educational supervisors will have key roles in ensuring that this approach meets the needs of junior trainees, as indeed they will for all aspects of haematology training that have been influenced by the pandemic.

In addition, the remote nature of the teaching has led to the participation of a small number of non-physician, non-laboratory healthcare professionals, principally haematology specialist prescribing pharmacists. Further evaluation of the teaching will be required to ensure that we are obtaining the benefits of multiprofessional training while not compromising the core aim of ensuring that clinical haematologists receive adequate training and continuing professional development in this core diagnostic skill. Future feedback questionnaires will need to be carefully formatted to ensure that the experiences of the small numbers of early trainees and non-haematologists are adequately captured without inadvertently identifying them, and that the needs of trainees based in other NHS trusts are being adequately met.

Potential future

Even as restrictions secondary to COVID-19 lift, we anticipate maintaining the morphology teaching in a remote, online form. Facilitators and participants alike are becoming more familiar with the virtual learning environment, and changes in the delivery of training due to COVID-19. Including zoomable or browsable digital images, such as those used by the NEQAS digital morphology scheme (www.ukneqash.org/dm), would be a valuable future development and one that we hope to incorporate in the near future. It will also be important to ensure that any changes in the format of the haematology FRCPath Part 2 examination (such as the inclusion of digital morphology examinations) are reflected in the teaching. As trainees rotate through laboratory haematology at UHBW and other trusts in the region, the overall morphology learning experience will be blended, with microscopy training in their host trusts as well as centrally delivered online morphology teaching. We believe this blended approach could be readily adapted for use in other clinical pathology specialties.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Hamilton PW
    , van Diest PJ, Williams R, Gallagher AG. Do we see what we think we see? The complexities of morphological assessment. J Pathol 2009;218:285–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Shlebak AA
    , Bain BJ. Training future haematologists, a privilege or a burden? “A trainer's view”. Br J Haematol 2017;178:501–7.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Cheong MA
    , Chee YL, Ng HJ, Jen WY. Keeping the bloodline of haematology medical education flowing during a pandemic. Int J Lab Hematol 2020;42:e196–8.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Liang ZC
    , Ooi SBS, Wang W. Pandemics and their impact on medical training: lessons from Singapore. Acad Med 2020;95:1359–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Stewart CM
    , Schifter CC, Selverian MEM. Teaching and learning with technology: Beyond constructivism, 4th edn. New York: Routledge, 2010.
  6. ↵
    1. Westerlaken M
    , Christiaans-Dingelhoff I, Filius RM, et al. Blended learning for postgraduates; an interactive experience. BMC Med Educ 2019;19:289.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Haematology morphology teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a UK teaching hospital experience
Sarah K Westbury, Andrew Stewart
Future Healthc J Mar 2021, 8 (1) e153-e155; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2020-0159

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Haematology morphology teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a UK teaching hospital experience
Sarah K Westbury, Andrew Stewart
Future Healthc J Mar 2021, 8 (1) e153-e155; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2020-0159
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Background
    • Problem
    • Solution
    • Results so far
    • Further evaluation
    • Potential future
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Supporting integration: the creation of a framework to support the design and delivery of clinical academic integration across a complex system
  • A mixed-methods analysis of the climate impact, acceptability, feasibility and cost of switching from single-use pulp to reusable plastic trays in a large NHS trust
  • Harnessing the force of post-F2 doctors – a medical clinical fellow post that transformed locally employed doctor recruitment
Show more Case study

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2023 by the Royal College of Physicians