Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Will the unusual become usual? A new legal change that aims to increase discussions around organ and tissue donation in England

Heena Khiroya, Adnan Sharif, June Jones and Derek Willis
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2020-0098
Future Healthc J March 2021
Heena Khiroya
AQueen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
Roles: specialty registrar in palliative medicine and RCP chief registrar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: heenakhiroya@doctors.org.uk
Adnan Sharif
BQueen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
Roles: consultant in nephrology and transplantation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
June Jones
CEdge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
Roles: senior lecturer in medical education
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Derek Willis
DSevern Hospice, Telford, UK
Roles: consultant in palliative medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

ABSTRACT

UK guidelines recommend that discussions about organ and tissue donation are conducted as part of end-of-life care. However, there are several barriers to discussing organ donation, and this is reflected in a critical shortage of donors. This article explores who should start the conversation about donation and how all healthcare practitioners can maximise their communication skills to have success in this area. It is particularly pertinent to be upskilled in this area in light of the recent legal change in England, where the system moved from an opt-in to a ‘soft’ opt-out one. Based on a similar legal change that took place in Wales and global data, it is unlikely that the legal change alone will prompt an increase in donation rates in England. This article proposes suggestions to increase awareness and conversations among healthcare professionals and patients with education, public health campaigns and interventions rooted in psychological theory.

KEYWORDS:
  • advance care planning
  • end-of-life care
  • communication skills,
  • organ and tissue donation

Should discussions around organ and tissue donation be a routine part of advance care planning?

National guidelines in the UK recommend that organ and tissue donation discussions should be considered a standard part of planning for end-of-life care.1 Normalising conversations about organ donation at the end of life has been shown to increase support for bereaved families, as well as improving organ donation rates.2 By having separate meetings with families in critical care about end-of-life care and donation, there is evidence to suggest that consent rates for donation decrease significantly when compared with discussing both topics in the same meeting.3 However, in Australia, donation preferences are considered separately from advance care planning (ACP), with the rationale that potential donors are a different population to those undertaking ACP, and that ACP is not solely about wishes at the end of life.4 Whether you consider organ donation a core part of ACP or not, it should feature highly in the thoughts of any healthcare practitioner seeing patients near the end of life.

What are the barriers that stop us from talking about organ and tissue donation?

Despite major changes in the infrastructure for organ donation in the UK since 2008, there are not enough donated organs to meet the current need.5 Only 1% of annual deaths in the UK occur in circumstances where the deceased could be a potential donor.6 Identification and availability of sufficient donor organsare are major barriers for transplantation, but the most important barrier is widely acknowledged as failure to secure consent for organ retrieval.5 A lack of knowledge on the part of healthcare practitioners around organ and tissue donation has been identified as an obstacle to discussing donation with patients.7 Knowledge varies depending on specialist clinical area, education and length of professional experience.8 While donation is generally viewed as a rewarding opportunity, clinical staff do not raise the topic with patients because of concerns about the impact this discussion may have on patients and families.9 Healthcare professionals also acknowledge that the organ donation process can be stressful, and their own emotions (such as grief and compassion fatigue) can affect whether they undertake this discussion with patients.10

Further research has explored the patient perspective about donation. A service evaluation of hospice inpatients who were offered information about corneal donation suggests that the fears of staff about causing distress to patients and families are unfounded.11 Depending on their comorbidities, patients are not always sure about their eligibility to donate tissue and organs.12 This is in keeping with the literature suggesting suboptimal knowledge among healthcare professionals, perhaps explaining why neither patients nor staff feel comfortable to initiate the conversation.

Who should start the conversation around organ and tissue donation, and when should this happen?

In the UK, specialist nurses for organ donation (SNODs) are trained to facilitate requests for organ donation, and are often embedded in critical care departments.13 When a patient is near the end of their life in critical care and has been identified as a potential donor, guidelines suggest that a multidisciplinary approach should be taken towards the conversation. Doctors and nurses who know the patient, faith representatives if appropriate, and SNODs are all part of the team who should meet with the patient’s family.14

Palliative care services could be ideally placed to normalise discussions about organ donation near the end of life. This is because there are significant numbers of patients dying outside of intensive care units who are under-recognised as potential organ donors.15 Palliative care specialists could use their skills to effectively communicate with patients about their wishes and goals of care.16 However, corneas are often the only tissue that patients with a malignancy can donate. Therefore, palliative care doctors will most commonly only discuss corneal donation as part of ACP with their patients, and would require more training to undertake discussions about organ and tissue donation in full.

Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) groups have low rates of deceased donation, which results in significantly longer waiting times for transplantation when compared with white patients.17 Low rates of donation are due to uncertainties around religious permissibility and a lack of trust in healthcare professionals by BAME patients, coupled with clinicians’ lack of confidence in communicating with and supporting BAME families.18 There is evidence to suggest that discussing topics such as organ donation and end-of-life care is more acceptable to BAME groups if conversations are conducted by members of their own community.18,19

Regardless of specialty or ethnicity, interviews have found that patients would prefer face-to-face discussions with someone with whom they had established a close rapport, and earlier in their disease trajectory, in order to engage fully in the decision-making process.12 This, along with the fact that patients are happy to have ACP discussions with any doctor who is willing to open the conversation with them, suggests that it is the responsibility of all healthcare practitioners to broach the topic of donation with patients as soon as a strong relationship has been established.20

How can the way in which we communicate influence rates of organ and tissue donation?

The family perspective has been shown to be important when interviewing patients and family refusal is the largest factor contributing to the loss of potential donors.12,14 Most of the background literature on how communication can influence organ donation is in relation to the family experience. While someone with appropriate skills and timing should have the conversation around organ and tissue donation, the way in which the information is presented to the grieving family can have an impact on the final decision made.14 Guidelines from the UK suggest that negative, apologetic and coercive language should be avoided, wheras in America, clinicians have moved from a neutral approach to one of positivity towards organ donation.14,21 This involves advocating for the family of the potential donor, while equally presenting the needs of those on the transplant waiting list.21 It is assumed that families will be pro-donation, and this has proved to be an effective communication strategy.3

Clinicians with higher self-confidence in their communication skills have higher levels of comfort with discussing organ and tissue donation, and this is reflected in increased rates of family consent.22,23 The amount of time that clinicians spend having the discussion and family perception that they have been treated in a caring and compassionate manner are both associated with higher levels of family comfort with the organ donation procedure.23

Similar to the benefits of a strong doctor–patient relationship, relatives are more likely to be comfortable with their decision around organ donation in the long term if they have a strong relationship with the consulting clinician.24 Factors that help bolster this relationship include information giving, openness, trust and empathy.24 Relatives of those who have donated tissue have evaluated their experiences positively, with 83% stating that they would donate again.25 This is important from an ethical standpoint, because the current perspective in the UK is that the deceased’s deemed consent and the family’s permission to tissue donation is a double veto, with each having the power to override the other’s desire to donate.26

How has the law around organ and tissue donation changed in England?

The law changed in England on 20 May 2020, with organ and tissue donation moving from an opt-in to a ‘soft’ opt-out system.27,28 All adults in England are now considered to be potential organ donors when they die and family permission to proceed will be sought, unless they have previously recorded a decision not to donate organs, or are in one of the excluded groups. These groups have been listed as those under the age of 18, those lacking mental capacity to make decisions around organ donation, visitors to England and people who have lived in England for less than 12 months prior to their death.28 The legal change has been implemented because of the shortage of organ donors. In 2018 there were 408 people who died in the UK while on the transplant waiting list, and there were nearly 800 further people who were removed from the waiting list due to deteriorating health.28,29

What can we expect to happen in England based on a similar recent law change in Wales?

In December 2015, a similar legal change took place in Wales where the system is ‘deemed consent’. This means that if a person has not recorded an opt-in or opt-out decision, it is considered that they have no objections towards organ and tissue donation.30 Data from Wales could be used to speculate what may happen in England. Trends in organ and tissue donation are likely to be transferable from Wales to England because figures on organ donation and transplant waiting lists are proportionately similar in both populations.31,32 Alongside this, rates of organ donation are far lower in England and Wales when compared with the rest of Europe despite favourable attitudes towards donation in both countries.33,34 Awareness of the legal change in Wales was high in December 2015, but this awareness had dropped by 2017, suggesting that engagement with the general public needed to be maintained for longer.35 By contrast, in England, the legal change has been overshadowed by the current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and initial awareness is likely to be lower than it was in Wales. This could be rectified by a stronger communication campaign as pressures related to COVID-19 ease.

The opt-out system has been received positively in Wales with 71% of the Welsh public saying they were in favour of it 1 year after the change in legislation.35 However, positive attitudes among the public and increased knowledge among healthcare professionals have not translated to a rise in donors.35 Analysis of consent data from Wales shows that more families have given approval for organ and tissue donation since the law change there.35 For example, the upward trend in the proportion of families consenting to donation after brain death in Wales as compared with England reached statistical significance 33 months after the Welsh law change.36 However, this increase in consent has not been reflected in the quarterly donation figures reported.35,36 This may be because there has been lower eligibility for organ donation since the legislative change; or perhaps the law change in Wales has not yet had enough time to make an impact. Any complex behaviour change intervention such as this requires public and professional buy-in, both of which can be influenced by the way in which the media presents information.37 It is likely that we will observe the same delay in an increase in donation after the law change in England, and this will probably be compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic.

What can we do to further address the issue of organ and tissue shortages?

On a global scale, the data on organ and tissue donation between opt-in and opt-out countries draw ambivalent conclusions due to dated studies and heterogeneous methodology. Confounding variables include varying economies, public health campaigns and cultural attitudes towards donation. A recent study looking at 35 countries demonstrated no significant difference in deceased organ donation or solid organ transplantation between opt-in and opt-out countries.38 This is in keeping with the short-term data that we have from the recent law change in Wales.35,36 Given that the law change itself may not make a difference in England, it is worth thinking about future avenues in education, public health and psychology that can enhance the impact of the new opt-out system.

Healthcare practitioners need to improve their confidence in talking about organ and tissue donation. Confidence and having a successful conversation are directly linked to experience, but simulation-based education can also help in this regard.39,40 Clinicians that work in critical care and palliative care are well placed to utilise their communication skills for patients near the end of life, and those who look after patients with chronic conditions are well placed to start the conversation earlier than this. Organ and tissue donation should form a standardised part of trainees’ curricula in specialties such as critical care, palliative medicine and general practice.

While the impact of presumed consent legislation for organ donation is uncertain, it is clear that public health interventions can address organ shortages.41 The American narrative of dual advocacy could be woven into media campaigns to inform the general population about the benefits of transplantation and reframe donation in a positive, rather than a neutral, way.21 Although it would not be ethical to give out identifiable information, giving generic information about potential transplant recipients prior to decisions being taken about organ donation could increase rates by letting donors visualise a tangible outcome from their action.42 Countries such as Israel and Iran provide incentives to donate.41 Although this brings up ethical concerns around the commodification and commercialisation of organ donation, we can learn from these countries and consider ways to remove financial disincentives for live organ donors, such as loss of income and reimbursement of added expenses. Among BAME communities where donation rates are low, peer educators have been shown to be effective in sensitively communicating about organ donation and could be a useful public health initiative to provide targeted information that tackles specific considerations around faith and cultural attitudes.17,19

The psychological rationale of the opt-out system is that it bridges the gap between intention and action, and makes it simpler for a willing person to become an organ donor.43 However, the opt-in system is perceived as being clearer and less ambiguous when it comes to families being involved in the conversation.43 One way that decisions could be made clearer in an opt-out system is where society mandates a choice. For example, people could make a decision in advance and record this in writing on the back of a driving license.41 The opt-out system normalises organ donation as a choice and psychologically reframes it as an everyday responsibility that is prosocial but low in significance.44 Policy makers should use psychology to understand that people will attach less meaning to organ donation under the opt-out law, and this could drive up organ donation rates by implicitly making it the norm to donate.

Conclusion

The new law means that the presumption of donation is now enforceable in England, but there still seems to be a conspiracy of silence with the majority of clinicians finding it too difficult to have the conversation, and it being considered unusual to talk about donation in settings outside of critical care.45 Indeed, if an opt-out system is in place, one could argue that there is both an ethical and a legal imperative to make this a more usual conversation. The legal change itself may not encourage increased discussion around organ and tissue donation, and perhaps we should be more explicit that the law will not do ACP for us. However, what this new law can do is give healthcare practitioners in all specialties the confidence to open up the conversation around donation when they have established a good rapport with their patients.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    . Organ donation for transplantation: improving donor identification and consent rates for deceased organ donation: Clinical guideline [CG135]. NICE, 2016. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg135/chapter/1-Recommendations#identifying-patients-who-are-potential-donors [Accessed 07 August 2020].
  2. ↵
    1. Mills L
    , Koulouglioti C. How can nurses support relatives of a dying patient with the organ donation option? Nurs Crit Care 2016;21:214–24.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Potter JE
    , Perry L, Elliott RM, et al. Communication with families regarding organ and tissue donation after death in intensive care (COMFORT): a multicentre before-and-after study. Crit Care Resusc 2018;20:268–76.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Saul P
    . Why isn’t organ donation part of advance care planning? BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 2012;2:173.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. NHS Blood and Transplant
    . Taking organ transplantation to 2020: a detailed strategy. NHS, 2013. https://nhsbtdbe.blob.core.windows.net/umbraco-assets-corp/4240/nhsbt_organ_donor_strategy_long.pdf [Accessed 8 June 2020].
  6. ↵
    1. NHS Blood and Transplant
    . Get the facts about organ donation. NHS. www.organdonation.nhs.uk/helping-you-to-decide/about-organ-donation/get-the-facts [Accessed 12 June 2020].
  7. ↵
    1. Wale J
    , Arthur A, Faull C. An analysis of knowledge and attitudes of hospice staff towards organ and tissue donation. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 2014;4:98–103.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Jawoniyi O
    , Gormley K, McGleenan E, Noble HR. Organ donation and transplantation: awareness and roles of healthcare professionals – a systematic literature review. J Clin Nurs 2018;27:e726–38.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Gillon S
    , Hurlow A, Rayment C, Zacharias H, Lennard R. Obstacles to corneal donation amongst hospice inpatients: a questionnaire survey of multi-disciplinary team member’s attitudes, knowledge, practice and experience. Palliat Med 2012;26:939–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Dicks SG
    , Burkolter N, Jackson LC, Northam HL, Boer DP. Grief, stress, trauma, and support during the organ donation process. Transplant Direct 2019;6:e512.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Mollart S
    , Tregenna E. Addressing palliative care staff fears that discussing cornea donation is distressing for people. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 2018;8(Suppl 1):A54–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Walker L
    , Neoh K, Gilkes H, Rayment C. A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews of palliative care patients' views on corneal donation and the timing of its discussion. Palliat Med 2018;32:1428–37.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Gardiner D
    , Beale S. Strengthening the clinical lead for organ donation role. NHS, 2017. https://nhsbtdbe.blob.core.windows.net/umbraco-assets-corp/5830/strengthening-clod-role-september-2017.pdf [Accessed 25 June 2020].
  14. ↵
    1. Consent/Authorisation Best Practice Development Group
    . Approaching the families of potential organ donors: best practice guidance. NHS, 2015. http://odt.nhs.uk/pdf/family_approach_best_practice_guide.pdf [Accessed 7 August 2020].
  15. ↵
    1. Witjes M
    , Kotsopoulos A, Herold IHF, et al. The influence of end-of-life care on organ donor potential. Am J Transplant 2017;17:1922–7.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Lustbader D
    , Frankenthaler M. Life after death: what every palliative care provider should know about organ and tissue donation. J Pain Symptom Manage 2015;49:P357.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. NHS Blood and Transplant
    . Organ donation and ethnicity. NHS. www.organdonation.nhs.uk/helping-you-to-decide/organ-donation-and-ethnicity [Accessed 7 August 2020].
  18. ↵
    1. Morgan M
    , Kenten C, Deedat S, et al. Increasing the acceptability and rates of organ donation among minority ethnic groups: a programme of observational and evaluative research on Donation, Transplantation and Ethnicity (DonaTE). Southampton: NIHR Journals Library, 2016.
  19. ↵
    1. Jain N
    . Increasing black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) patient & community awareness–using the peer educator model. J Ren Care 2014;40 Suppl 1:36–40.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Simon J
    , Porterfield P, Bouchal SR, Heyland D. ‘Not yet’ and ‘Just ask’: barriers and facilitators to advance care planning - a qualitative descriptive study of the perspectives of seriously ill, older patients and their families. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 2015;5:54–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Luskin RS
    , Glazier AK, Delmonico FL. Organ donation and dual advocacy. New Engl J Med 2008;358:1297–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Ismail SY
    , Kums E, Mahmood SK, Hoitsma AJ, Jansen NE. Increasing consent and assent rate for organ and tissue donation: communication about donation-Telephone advice by psychologist. Transplant Proc 2018;50:3017–24.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Traino HM
    , Molisani AJ, Siminoff LA. Regional differences in communication process and outcomes of requests for solid organ donation. Am J Transplant 2017;17:1620–7.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Jöbges S
    , Denke C, Kumpf O, Hartog CS. Communication with relatives. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2019;114:122–7.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Roque R
    , Rodríguez-Villar C, Ruíz A, et al. Relatives’ perception after tissue donation experience: results of a postdonation phone survey. Transplant Proc 2017;49:2296–8.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Wilkinson TM
    . Individual and family consent to organ and tissue donation: is the current position coherent? J Med Ethics 2005;31:587–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. NHS Blood and Transplant
    . Organ donation law in England is changing. NHS. www.organdonation.nhs.uk/uk-laws/organ-donation-law-in-england [Accessed 20 April 2020].
  28. ↵
    1. NHS Blood and Transplant
    . What is the opt out system in England? NHS. www.organdonation.nhs.uk/helping-you-to-decide/about-organ-donation/faq/what-is-the-opt-out-system [Accessed 20 April 2020].
  29. ↵
    1. NHS Blood and Transplant
    . Highest ever number of organ donors, despite drop in numbers of people eligible to donate. NHS, 2019. www.nhsbt.nhs.uk/news/highest-ever-number-of-organ-donors-despite-drop-in-numbers-of-people-eligible-to-donate [Accessed 25 June 2020].
  30. ↵
    1. NHS Blood and Transplant
    . Organ donation law in Wales. NHS. www.organdonation.nhs.uk/uk-laws/organ-donation-law-in-wales [Accessed 17 December 2019].
  31. ↵
    1. NHS Blood and Transplant
    . Organ donation and transplantation activity data: Wales. NHS, 2020. https://nhsbtdbe.blob.core.windows.net/umbraco-assets-corp/18654/nhsbt-wales-summary-report-mar-20.pdf [Accessed 1 June 2020].
  32. ↵
    1. NHS Blood and Transplant
    . Organ donation and transplantation activity data: England. NHS, 2020. https://nhsbtdbe.blob.core.windows.net/umbraco-assets-corp/18651/nhsbt-england-summary-report-mar-20.pdf [Accessed 01 June 2020].
  33. ↵
    1. Murphy PG
    , Smith M. Towards a framework for organ donation in the UK. Br J Anaesth 2012;108:i56–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Coad L
    , Carter N, Ling J. Attitudes of young adults from the UK towards organ donation and transplantation. Transplant Res 2013;2:9.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Young V
    , McHugh S, Glendinning R, Carr-Hill R. Evaluation of the Human Transplantation (Wales) Act: Impact Evaluation Report. Welsh Government, 2017. https://gov.wales/sites/default/files/statistics-and-research/2019-05/evaluation-human-transplantation-wales-act-impact.pdf [Accessed 1 June 2020].
  36. ↵
    1. Madden S
    , Collett D, Walton P, et al. The effect on consent rates for deceased organ donation in Wales after the introduction of an opt-out system. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:1146–52.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Noyes J
    , Morgan K, Walton P, et al. Family attitudes, actions, decisions and experiences following implementation of deemed consent and the Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013: mixed-method study protocol. BMJ Open 2017;7:e017287.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Arshad A
    , Anderson B, Sharif A. Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems. Kidney International 2019;95:1453–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Siminoff LA
    , Traino HM, Genderson MW. Communicating effectively about organ donation: a randomized trial of a behavioral communication intervention to improve discussions about donation. Transplantation Direct 2015;1:e5.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Potter JE
    , Gatward JJ, Kelly MA, et al. Simulation-based communication skills training for experienced clinicians to improve family conversations about organ and tissue donation. Prog Transplant 2017;27:339–45.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Shanmugarajah K
    , Villani V, Madariaga MLL, Shalhoub J, Michel SG. Current progress in public health models addressing the critical organ shortage. Int J Surg 2014;12:1363–8.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Shaw D
    , Gardiner D. Increasing organ donation rates by revealing recipient details to families of potential donors. J Med Ethics 2018;44:101–3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Miller J
    , Currie S, O’Carroll RE. ‘If I donate my organs it’s a gift, if you take them it’s theft’: a qualitative study of planned donor decisions under opt-out legislation. BMC Public Health 2019;19:1463.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Davidai S
    , Gilovich T, Ross LD. The meaning of default options for potential organ donors. PNAS 2012;109:15201–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Willis D
    , Draper H. To make the unusual usual: is there an imperative to discuss organ donation with palliative care patients? Int J Palliat Nurs 2012;18:5–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Will the unusual become usual? A new legal change that aims to increase discussions around organ and tissue donation in England
Heena Khiroya, Adnan Sharif, June Jones, Derek Willis
Future Healthc J Mar 2021, 8 (1) e170-e173; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2020-0098

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Will the unusual become usual? A new legal change that aims to increase discussions around organ and tissue donation in England
Heena Khiroya, Adnan Sharif, June Jones, Derek Willis
Future Healthc J Mar 2021, 8 (1) e170-e173; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2020-0098
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Should discussions around organ and tissue donation be a routine part of advance care planning?
    • What are the barriers that stop us from talking about organ and tissue donation?
    • Who should start the conversation around organ and tissue donation, and when should this happen?
    • How can the way in which we communicate influence rates of organ and tissue donation?
    • How has the law around organ and tissue donation changed in England?
    • What can we expect to happen in England based on a similar recent law change in Wales?
    • What can we do to further address the issue of organ and tissue shortages?
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evolution of the clinical simulation approach to assess digital health technologies
  • To find fault is easy, to find no-fault is fair
  • A wide vocabulary for person-centred care
Show more Opinion

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2023 by the Royal College of Physicians