Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Respiratory outpatient clinics during and post COVID-19: the use of patient satisfaction and preference data to redesign service delivery

Malvika Bhatnagar, Paul McCallion, John Davison, Tony DeSoyza and Katy Hester
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2020-0181
Future Healthc J March 2021
Malvika Bhatnagar
ANewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Roles: ST3 respiratory medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul McCallion
Brespiratory medicine, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Roles: senior physiotherapist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Davison
CNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Roles: senior nurse specialist for complex lung diseases
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tony DeSoyza
DNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Roles: honorary consultant physician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katy Hester
ENewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Roles: consultant respiratory physician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: katy.hester@nhs.net
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

ABSTRACT

We used a survey to evaluate patient satisfaction with a remote system for the delivery of respiratory clinics and to capture future preferences. 98% of responders were satisfied with their current appointment being held remotely in order to reduce the risks from COVID-19. Regarding future preferences beyond the pandemic, 41% of respondents preferred a face-to-face appointment, 35% preferred a remote appointment and 24% had no preference of one modality over another. Additional qualitative data suggest that a flexible system allowing patients to choose the mode of attendance shortly before the appointment would be welcomed.

KEYWORDS:
  • respiratory clinics
  • remote consultation
  • patient satisfaction and preference
  • redesign service

Background and methods

The COVID-19 pandemic has altered medical service delivery, but also provided an opportunity to examine our practices and determine areas requiring improvement. The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) released guidance on resetting outpatient services in the context of the pandemic using quality improvement methods.1 In keeping with guidance, we conducted a study to evaluate a remote clinic delivery system by capturing patient satisfaction with the new system and their future preferences, with the aim of informing redesign of service delivery post-COVID-19.

We converted multiple respiratory clinics to telephone or video consultations. At the conclusion of remote appointments, patients (n=269, see Table 1) were asked a series of questions regarding their consultation and future preferences. Data were collected from multiple clinics, including four consultant-led clinics (a general respiratory clinic, two bronchiectasis clinics and a COPD clinic), two specialist nurse clinics (severe asthma and bronchiectasis clinics), and one physiotherapist clinic with mainly bronchiectasis patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Characteristics of patients surveyed

Results

We achieved a response rate of 92% (248/269), with 98% of responders being satisfied with their current appointment being held remotely. When asked about future preferences for appointments, 41% of respondents preferred a face-to-face appointment when safe to do so, 35% preferred a remote appointment (29% telephone, 6% video), and 24% had no preference of one modality over another.

Discussion

Physical footfall in clinics could, therefore, potentially be reduced by almost 60% without adversely affecting patient satisfaction. Exploration of patients’ preferences for future clinic formats revealed an overarching theme of ‘wanting choice of clinic format’, wherein patients could choose the mode of attendance, with ‘perceived wellness’ being a common theme influencing their decisions. These qualitative data suggest that incorporating systems that facilitate conversion between modalities as the appointment nears would seem to be the optimum approach. This would further improve patient satisfaction and most appropriate allocation and uptake of clinic slots.

Our response rate was high, perhaps due to concurrent data collection at conclusion of the remote appointment. This is, therefore, likely to describe patient preferences more accurately than studies with lower response rates. The data also reflect a mixed patient population from multidisciplinary clinics.

This project focused on patient preferences. More work to ascertain clinical effectiveness and identification of suitable patients and schedules for facilitating remote services safely is needed.

Conclusions

The conversion of respiratory outpatient appointments to remote consultations was well received within our cohort. Being able to provide a significant proportion of multidisciplinary patient appointments remotely allows for potential reductions in costs, travel time and environmental impacts. It also has potential to reduce waiting time for those requiring face-to-face assessment, for example, those with severe asthma or being investigated for lung cancer who may be more suited to an in-person appointment. Reducing overcrowding in waiting rooms decreases risks of infection even beyond COVID-19. Most patients wanted choice of mode of attendance closer to the appointment. Redesigning services with these features will be a big step towards improving efficiency of outpatient services in line with patient preferences and novel ways of working post-COVID-19.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Royal College of Physicians
    . Rebuilding the NHS – Resetting outpatient services for the 21st century in the context of COVID-19. RCP, 2020. Available from www.rcplondon.ac.uk/guidelines-policy/rebuilding-nhs-resetting-outpatient-services-21st-century-context-covid-19.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Respiratory outpatient clinics during and post COVID-19: the use of patient satisfaction and preference data to redesign service delivery
Malvika Bhatnagar, Paul McCallion, John Davison, Tony DeSoyza, Katy Hester
Future Healthc J Mar 2021, 8 (1) e21-e22; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2020-0181

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Respiratory outpatient clinics during and post COVID-19: the use of patient satisfaction and preference data to redesign service delivery
Malvika Bhatnagar, Paul McCallion, John Davison, Tony DeSoyza, Katy Hester
Future Healthc J Mar 2021, 8 (1) e21-e22; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2020-0181
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Background and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Reference
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The new UK SARS-CoV-2 variant and lockdown – causes and consequences
  • Fluid-repellent surgical mask (FRSM) fit – one size does not fit all
  • The utility of a local multidisciplinary working group to oversee the establishment of rapidly evolving standards of care and to support trial recruitment during the COVID-19 pandemic
Show more COVID-19 rapid report

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians