Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

An audible patient voice: How can we ensure that patients are treated as partners in their own safety?

Christian P Subbe, Saleyha Ahsan, Lowri Smith and Johanna Frey Renggli
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2021-0131
Future Healthc J November 2021
Christian P Subbe
ASchool of Medical Sciences, Bangor, UK
Roles: senior clinical lecturer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: c.subbe@bangor.ac.uk
Saleyha Ahsan
BCambridge University, Cambridge, UK
Roles: emergency physician and PhD student
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lowri Smith
CRuthin, UK
Roles: patient representative
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johanna Frey Renggli
DUniversity Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Roles: emergency physician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

ABSTRACT

How can patients and their relatives make their concerns heard by healthcare professionals? Many serious adverse events are preceded by patients' worry and concern. This article explores changes in the structures and processes of healthcare that might facilitate safer systems. One important tool might be the ability of patients to become equal partners in the recording of their clinical history.

KEYWORDS:
  • patient centred
  • patient safety
  • adverse event

The experience of not being heard

Dr Saleyha Ahsan is a doctor working in emergency medicine. She experienced the powerlessness of being a relative when her mother was admitted to hospital. Despite being a doctor (and an articulate renowned broadcast journalist), her concerns about the dramatic deterioration of her mother went unheard.1

Alison Phillips suffered serious injuries as part of a road traffic accident. On several occasions during her hospital stay, she and those close to her identified serious problems (that resulted in prolonged intensive care stays) well before her clinical team had.2

Lowri Smith has a complex congenital heart condition and has been under close supervision by a tertiary centre for her entire life. In 2018, she identified an infected central line but had difficulties to gain support with getting it removed (Box 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Box 1.

Lowri Smith's experience

What is common to all these experiences (and many others) is that patients and those close to them had prior experience and were applying their learning but had great difficulties to be heard as equitable partners in clinical safety during episodes of serious illness, and this despite being able to articulate this knowledge. Clinicians dismissed their evidence and expertise and were able to do so effortlessly.

Quality improvement beyond co-production

The reasons behind the observations earlier are complex and are sometimes described with the term ‘culture’. Culture manifests itself in beliefs and behaviour: beliefs about what is right, acceptable, tolerable and that are difficult to observe and quantify; and behaviours that can be observed and quantified.3 The usual response to ‘cultural’ challenges, complaints or adverse events are educational interventions.4 It would seem that after decades of a focus on better communication, ‘what matters to you’, co-production and shared decision making, something more transformational might be required?5–7 That would be something that shifts the balance of available information, intervention and governance (and power) towards those that are affected by medical error and adverse events.

Quality improvement can be described in terms of outcomes, processes that are required to deliver those and the structures that enable them. If patient safety is going to improve, it will require deeper understanding about the processes and structures that enable the current level of care and the changes that would deliver more reliably safe care.

A narrowing gap between professionals and patients

In many industries, customers have gained access to tools to that were previously the prerogative of experts, from reading of gas meters to building furniture. This has enabled a shift in the relationship between customers and experts. In medical care, cautious signs of such a shift are visible: using vital sign monitors during the COVID-19 pandemic, checklists for safer surgery, and accessing clinical records to document their own symptoms and views.8–10 A rising number of patients with chronic healthcare conditions in the UK are mastering the self-administration of complex and time sensitive medication at home while being wary that they are denied the ability to exercise this task in hospital.11 In all these instances, the gap between patients and healthcare professionals is narrowing.

An audible and readable patient voice

Taking a history is another pivotal step in the clinical process, for medical emergencies presenting to hospital, an extended history taking is often warranted. Against the backdrop of rising numbers of emergency visits, in recent years there has been research efforts to use automated tools for history taking. The feasibility of such tools has been demonstrated and a team from University of Basel has shown the ability of a history taking app in gathering an extended patient history (including personal history, allergies, systematic history, risk factors etc).12,13 Another team in Toronto was able to identify ambulatory patients significantly quicker than the routine nurse-initiated patient identification using a self-check-in kiosk.14 Automated tools have also been shown to reduce the waiting time before seeing a healthcare professional in the emergency department.15 A group in Sweden is currently investigating the use of a self-reported history taking for patients with acute chest pain collecting data to assess chest pain according to the HEART score.16

Self-reported history taking tools could aid a shift in the relationships between healthcare professionals and patients and an increase in the time for direct patient contact, thoughtful communication and subsequently improved patient care. Implementation at scale in large systems and over long periods of time might be required to explore the real effects for patients and the safety of their care.

In this edition of the Future Healthcare Journal, readers will find examples on how more reliable safe care might be practically achieved by and with patients during major surgery, critical deterioration or even routine care. The impact of the described interventions has often not been evaluated at scale yet, but the philosophy and practice are aligned with a vision or modern healthcare where patients and those close to them are equitable partners with their clinicians, with the ability to change the course of their care in real time.

Whether these tools allow true listening to patients and those close to them, and change some of the culture and hierarchical thinking that has dominated medical care and hindered breakthroughs for patients’ safety, remains to be seen.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Alison Phillips for her testimony and contribution to the paper.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Dispatches
    . Covid critical: a doctor's story: Dispatches. All 4, 2021. www.channel4.com/programmes/covid-critical-a-doctors-story-dispatches [Accessed 04 July 2021].
  2. ↵
    1. Health Service Journal Events
    . HSJ Patient Safety Congress 2018 - Alison Phillips Story. YouTube, 2019. www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPlBwk_V99o&ab_channel=HealthServiceJournalEvents [Accessed 04 July 2021].
  3. ↵
    1. Wakefield JG
    , McLaws ML, Whitby M, Patton L. Patient safety culture: Factors that influence clinician involvement in patient safety behaviours. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:585–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Cohen J
    , Patel S. A medical department with memory: learning from adverse events so history doesn't repeat itself. BMJ Opinion 2021. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/05/21/a-medical-department-with-memory-learning-from-adverse-events-so-history-doesnt-repeat-itself [Accessed 11 July 2021].
  5. ↵
    1. Healthcare Improvement Scotland
    . What matters to you? Healthcare Improvement Scotland, 2016.
  6. ↵
    1. Voorberg WH
    , Bekkers VJJM, Tummers LG. A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Manag Rev 2015;17:1333–57.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. The Health Foundation
    . Implementing shared decision making. London: The Health Foundation, 2013.
  8. ↵
    1. Thornton J
    . The ‘virtual wards' supporting patients with COVID-19 in the community. BMJ 2020;369:m2119.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Harris K
    , Søfteland E, Moi AL, et al. Patients' and healthcare workers' recommendations for a surgical patient safety checklist - A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020;20:1–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Wyatt J
    , Sathanandam S, Rastall P, Hoogewerf J, Wooldridge D. Personal health record (PHR) landscape review. Royal College of Physicians, 2016.
  11. ↵
    1. Stafford M
    , Steventon A, Thorlby R, et al. Briefing: Understanding the health care needs of people with multiple health conditions. The Health Foundation, 2018.
  12. ↵
    1. Zakim D
    . Development and significance of automated history-taking software for clinical medicine, clinical research and basic medical science. J Intern Med 2016;280:287–99.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Renggli JF
    , Eken C, Siegrist V, et al. Usability of a web-based software tool for history taking in the emergency department. Acute Med 2020;19:131–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Coyle N
    , Kennedy A, Schull MJ, et al. The use of a self-check-in kiosk for early patient identification and queuing in the emergency department. CJEM 2019;21:789–92.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Mahmood A
    , Wyant DK, Kedia S, et al. Self-check-in kiosks utilization and their association with wait times in emergency departments in the United States. J Emerg Med 2020;58:829–40.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Brandberg H
    , Sundberg CJ, Spaak J, et al. Use of self-reported computerized medical history taking for acute chest pain in the emergency department - the Clinical Expert Operating System Chest Pain Danderyd Study (CLEOS-CPDS): prospective cohort study. J Med Internet Res 2021;23:e25493.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
An audible patient voice: How can we ensure that patients are treated as partners in their own safety?
Christian P Subbe, Saleyha Ahsan, Lowri Smith, Johanna Frey Renggli
Future Healthc J Nov 2021, 8 (3) e564-e566; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0131

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
An audible patient voice: How can we ensure that patients are treated as partners in their own safety?
Christian P Subbe, Saleyha Ahsan, Lowri Smith, Johanna Frey Renggli
Future Healthc J Nov 2021, 8 (3) e564-e566; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0131
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • The experience of not being heard
    • Quality improvement beyond co-production
    • A narrowing gap between professionals and patients
    • An audible and readable patient voice
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Lessons post-COVID from national and international approaches to safety and quality in healthcare
  • When patients (and families) raise the alarm: Patient and family activated rapid response as a safety strategy for hospitals
Show more Patient safety

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians