Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Let's embed peer-support groups into the medical curriculum for all

Aisling Higham, Sophie Behrman, Haido Vlachos, Heidi Lightfoot, Richard Stevens and Gerti Stegen
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2021-0041
Future Healthc J November 2021
Aisling Higham
AHealth Education England Thames Valley, Oxford, UK
Roles: ophthalmology ST6 and trainee improvement fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: aisling.higham@nhs.net
Sophie Behrman
BOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
Roles: psychiatry ST6
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haido Vlachos
CHealth Education England Thames Valley, Oxford, UK
Roles: associate dean for professional support
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heidi Lightfoot
DUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
Roles: anaesthetics ST4
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Stevens
EHealth Education England Thames Valley, Oxford, UK
Roles: associate director of the professional support and wellbeing service
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerti Stegen
FOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
Roles: consultant psychiatrist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

ABSTRACT

Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, attending to the mental wellbeing of all doctors was high on the political agenda. The quality of patient care is also known to be related to doctors’ wellbeing. Now, in the midst of a global pandemic, doctors are having to cope with ever more trauma and moral injury. Group-based peer support and regular reflective practice are interventions known to reduce clinician burnout and optimise wellbeing.

Junior doctors are the most likely of all medical groups to be at a high risk of burnout. The NHS Staff and Learners’ Mental Wellbeing Commission report advocates establishing explicit peer support mechanisms and the use of peer support as part of the first line of psychological first aid.

Peer support is not addressed in the curriculum for the majority of medical specialties. We recommend that regular peer-support reflective groups are provided during protected time for all trainees.

KEYWORDS:
  • peer support
  • curriculum
  • wellbeing

The benefits of good peer support cannot be overstated, ranging from protecting wellbeing to improving reflective ability and providing psychological safety.1–3 The NHS Staff and Learners’ Mental Wellbeing Commission report advocates establishing explicit peer support mechanisms and the use of peer support as part of the first line of psychological first aid.4 Peer-to-peer support methods are successful at providing wellbeing support, with a survey of 112 doctors showing 88% would potentially seek support from a physician colleague if needed, in contrast to only 48% who stated they would access mental health professional support.5

Junior doctors are the most likely of all medic groups to be at a high risk of burnout, with trainees being at particular risk of ‘feeling unsupported’.6,7 Beyond supporting wellbeing, peer support is closely associated with improved resilience, the idea of ‘coping, adapting or thriving from adverse or challenging events.’1,8 Reflecting together is also a key component of learning and training and is a General Medical Council (GMC) requirement.2 Reflecting in an objective manner, as done in peer-support groups, is also beneficial to resilience, helping clinicians to avoid excessive self-criticism, which can impact on mental wellbeing and contribute to burnout.9

There is still a huge amount of stigma surrounding mental health, and concern from trainees about being perceived as a ‘failing’ or ‘problem’ trainee if they seek help.10 Practising as a doctor is unlike many other professions; it is more than just a job, it's part of a doctor's sense of self and identity: ‘Doctors do not become unwell and do not show their vulnerabilities.’11 What is vital to understand is that medicine is challenging for everyone and we need to embed mechanisms to protect wellbeing into the medical culture from day 1. Group peer support allows everyone to develop a better understanding of the emotions and reactions of others in their team in order to normalise these emotional responses to their work and make headway in reversing the negative stigma.

The benefits of good wellbeing extend beyond the individual: the wellbeing of doctors is directly linked to the quality of patient care.12 Better physician wellbeing was associated with improved patient satisfaction, improved treatment and even lower rates of hospital-acquired infections.13,14 Moreover there is evidence that improving staff wellbeing has measurable financial advantages.15

We all strive for excellent healthcare, and this can usually only be achieved by a whole team of professionals. Teams work best when individuals feel psychologically safe.16 Students have described the psychological safety associated with peer-support groups; freeing them to learn in the present moment without being concerned about what others think of them.3 They feel psychologically safe because of the interpersonal connections, as well as understood and cared for as a person.3 These good interpersonal relationships are also linked to the perception that the organisation as a whole is supportive.17

The ‘Civility Saves Lives’ movement has brought to the forefront the knowledge that when someone is rude to a colleague it significantly reduces their cognitive ability and performance; research shows that the individual will consequently be 50% less willing to help others.18,19 Bradley et al report that rudeness is more prevalent in certain specialties, namely radiology, general surgery, neurosurgery and cardiology.20 Rudeness is more likely to happen when an individual is overworked or under-supported but, interestingly, not all high-intensity specialties have the same prevalence of rudeness.20 The concept of the ‘hidden curriculum’ is particularly relevant in this domain, whereby entrenched tribalism and hierarchy in particular specialties may explain different departmental cultures and tolerance of this behaviour.21,22 It is also interesting to note that different personality types are attracted to different specialties, and a complex interplay between these factors may help us understand the inter-specialty differences in behaviour.20,21,23 We postulate that peer support encourages collaboration and support for colleagues, and the ability to understand how your behaviour influences others in the team, a key skill defined in Good medical practice.24 Better peer support could lead to more civility, through increased insight into the emotional effects of these acts of incivility and through better staff wellbeing and coping strategies meaning better staff performance and ultimately better patient care.25

During this period of mandated social distancing, there has never been a more important time to provide protected time and space for peer support. Trainees may rotate to a new job and may not have previously met the members of their new team. We already know that regular rotations with the continual changes of colleagues/teams and environments impacts on the ability to form relationships, resulting in poor morale and isolation from peer groups.4 This correlates with findings from the British Medical Association (BMA) survey that showed that junior doctors were at the highest risk of burnout.6 These issues are likely to be amplified in the current climate.

With this amount of evidence proving the importance of peer-support, why does peer support not appear universally in training curricula? The psychiatry and general practice vocational training schemes are ahead of the game by incorporating regular reflective groups focusing on the emotional aspects of interactions with patients as well as colleagues; other specialties should aim to achieve this too.26,27 It perhaps feels logical that psychiatrists, as the profession specialising in the mental wellbeing of patients, are also proactive in looking after physician wellbeing. In addition, strong advocates like Prof Dame Clare Gerada with a background in general practice have also advanced the provision of wellbeing support.28 It would be interesting to formally evaluate the use of peer support in these specialties but, with so many confounding factors, it would be difficult to establish.

Peer support can be delivered in many guises. The Tea & Empathy group (www.facebook.com/groups/1215686978446877/about) was created in 2016 and provides a peer-to-peer support network via Facebook to provide a listening ear and supportive environment for doctors. Other models have included 1:1 near-peer support with pairings of a junior and more senior doctor.29 We have been using a model of group-based peer support whereby doctors have the opportunity to reflect with others in a similar position, with the distinct advantage of allowing peers to realise that their experiences and feelings are shared with many others.30

If there is anything positive to come from this pandemic, perhaps it will be the heightened realisation of the importance of peer support. We recommend that regular peer-support reflective groups are provided online during protected time within the working week. While we have focused on trainees, we are aware of other groups who may find peer support particularly beneficial, namely specialty and associate specialist doctors (SAS), older doctors and overseas trained doctors, as we note these groups were identified via the BMA survey as experiencing particular difficulty in accessing support.6 Peer support is vital to integrate as a key support mechanism into the medical profession, through training and beyond.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. McKinley N
    , Karayiannis PN, Convie L, et al. Resilience in medical doctors: a systematic review. Postgrad Med J 2019;95:140–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. General Medical Council
    . Benefits of becoming a reflective practitioner. GMC, 2019. www.gmc-uk.org/education/standards-guidance-and-curricula/guidance/reflective-practice/benefits-of-becoming-a-reflective-practitioner
  3. ↵
    1. Tsuei SH-T
    , Lee D, Ho C, et al. Exploring the construct of psychological safety in medical education. Acad Med 2019;94:S28–35.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. NHS Health Education England
    . NHS Staff and Learners’ Mental Wellbeing Commission. NHS, 2019.
  5. ↵
    1. Hu Y-Y
    , Fix ML, Hevelone ND, et al. Physicians’ needs in coping with emotional stressors: the case for peer support. Archives of Surgery 2012;147:212–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. British Medical Association
    . Caring for the mental health of the medical workforce. BMA, 2019.
  7. ↵
    1. Kinman G
    , Teoh K. What could make a difference to the mental health of UK doctors? A review of the research evidence. Society of Occupational Medicine, 2018.
  8. ↵
    1. Venegas CL
    , Nkangu MN, Duffy MC, et al. Interventions to improve resilience in physicians who have completed training: A systematic review. PLoS One 2019;14:e0210512.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges
    . Facilitating reflection: A guide for supervisors. AoMRC, 2019. www.aomrc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Facilitating_reflection_0619.pdf
  10. ↵
    1. Wainwright E
    , Fox F, Breffni T, et al. Coming back from the edge: a qualitative study of a professional support unit for junior doctors. BMC Med Educ 2017;17:142.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Gerada C
    . The making of a doctor: the matrix and self. Group Analysis 2019;52:350–61.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Shanafelt TD
    , Balch CM, Bechamps G, et al. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann Surg 2010;251:995–1000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Scheepers RA
    , Boerebach BCM, Arah OA, et al. A systematic review of the impact of physicians’ occupational well-being on the quality of patient care. Int J Behav Med 2015;22:683–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Topakas A
    , Admasachew L, Dawson J. NHS staff survey scores as predictors of trust outcomes. Aston University, 2011.
  15. ↵
    1. Shanafelt T
    , Goh J, Sinsky C. The business case for investing in physician well-being. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177:1826–32.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Nembhard IM
    , Edmondson AC. Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J Organ Behav 2006;27:941–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Eisenberger R
    , Huntington R, Huntington S, et al. Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology 1986;71:500–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Katz D
    , Blasius K, Isaak R, et al. Exposure to incivility hinders clinical performance in a simulated operative crisis. BMJ Qual Saf 2019;28:750–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Porath C
    , Erez A. Overlooked but not untouched. How rudeness reduces onlookers’ performance on routine and creative tasks. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2009;109:29–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Bradley V
    , Liddle S, Shaw R, et al. Sticks and stones: investigating rude, dismissive and aggressive communication between doctors. Clin Med 2015;15:541–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Gaufberg EH
    , Batalden M, Sands R, et al. The hidden curriculum: what can we learn from third-year medical student narrative reflections? Acad Med 2010;85:1709–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Hafferty FW
    . Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine's hidden curriculum. Acad Med 1998;73:403–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Mullola S
    , Hakulinen C, Presseau J, et al. Personality traits and career choices among physicians in Finland: employment sector, clinical patient contact, specialty and change of specialty. BMC Medical Education 2018;18:52.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. General Medical Council
    . Good medical practice. GMC, 2013. www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/good-medical-practice/domain-3—communication-partnership-and-teamwork [Accessed 07 June 2021].
  25. ↵
    1. Riskin A
    , Erez A, Foulk TA, et al. The impact of rudeness on medical team performance: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 2015;136:487–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Royal College of Psychiatrists
    . Core Training in Psychiatry CT1 – CT3. RCPsych, 2017.
  27. ↵
    1. Royal College of General Practitioners
    . The RCGP Curriculum: Professional & Clinical Modules. RCGP, 2016. www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/RCGP_Curriculum_modules_jan2016.pdf_68839814.pdf [Accessed 30 May 2021].
  28. ↵
    1. NHS Practitioner Health
    . Professor Dame Clare Gerada. NHS, 2020. www.practitionerhealth.nhs.uk/team/dr-clare-gerada [Accessed 08 June 2021].
  29. ↵
    1. Chanchlani S
    , Chang D, Ong JS, et al. The value of peer mentoring for the psychosocial wellbeing of junior doctors: a randomised controlled study. Med J Aust 2018;209:401–5.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Behrman S
    , Baruch N, Stegen G. Peer support for junior doctors: a positive outcome of the COVID-19 pandemic? FHJ 2020;7:e64–6.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Let's embed peer-support groups into the medical curriculum for all
Aisling Higham, Sophie Behrman, Haido Vlachos, Heidi Lightfoot, Richard Stevens, Gerti Stegen
Future Healthc J Nov 2021, 8 (3) e692-e694; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0041

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Let's embed peer-support groups into the medical curriculum for all
Aisling Higham, Sophie Behrman, Haido Vlachos, Heidi Lightfoot, Richard Stevens, Gerti Stegen
Future Healthc J Nov 2021, 8 (3) e692-e694; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0041
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Management of traumatic brain injury: practical development of a recent proposal
  • Response to: Management of traumatic brain injury: practical development of a recent proposal
  • Putting your HAT on
Show more Opinion

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians