COVID self-certification: recognition of postgraduate training and experiences gained during the pandemic
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic has placed significant pressures on healthcare services and professionals delivering patient care. Consequently, postgraduate medical training has been interrupted, with limited opportunities for supervised workplace-based assessments.1 Therefore, additional knowledge and skills gained, particularly those outside the scope of respective training curriculum, may not be robustly captured. This project aimed to identify trainees’ views on additional capabilities gained during the pandemic and the value of self-certification, in order to inform the design of a COVID self-certification template.
Methods
A SurveyMonkey® questionnaire was emailed to all postgraduate trainees in the East Midlands and Wessex deaneries. The survey was also disseminated via rota coordinators within surrounding NHS trusts. Data collection occurred between 1 and 20 July 2020.
Results and discussion
A total of 778 trainees completed the survey. Responses were equally split between both deaneries and represented a range of specialties (Fig 1). The majority of respondents were registrars (35%), followed by foundation trainees (25%), core trainees (23%), general practice trainees (12%), trust grade/fellows (3%) and ‘others’ (2%).
On analysis of free-text data, additional skills gained were categorised, in order of decreasing frequency, into: clinical (diagnostics, escalation of care, general medical knowledge, invasive and non-invasive ventilation); challenging communication; remote consultation; infection control (donning and doffing of personal protective equipment); procedural (chest drain, arterial and central line insertion); leadership and management (rota planning, guideline and service development); education (e-learning design and delivery); and COVID-19 research.
Views on the usefulness of a COVID certificate were varied (n=729) – 72% positive, 17% negative and 11% mixed/neutral. Most welcomed the proposal as a source of ‘reward’, ‘confidence booster’ and ‘recognition’ for their ‘hard work’, but also as a record of learning during the temporary ‘pause in training’. However, it was perceived that a ‘generic’ document would lack competitive advantage and be superfluous to existing e-portfolios. Others cited concerns about additional bureaucratic workload and lack of formal endorsement for use during Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP). Some viewed the process as potentially discriminatory to those who were not formally redeployed, including ‘shielding’ colleagues, who may be perceived as less deserving. In view of these responses, it was apparent that self-certification should be voluntary and adaptable to suit diverse experiences, with minimal administrative burden.
Conclusion
We have created a COVID self-certification template (Fig 2) in collaboration with postgraduate trainee representatives, the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and Health Education England.2 The template is suitable for use by any medical or non-medical healthcare professional. It provides an account of additional capabilities acquired during the pandemic, which may be used as evidence towards attaining curriculum competencies or professional revalidation. It may also facilitate workforce planning and future redeployment to areas of clinical need to ensure provision of safe, prompt and effective patient care. A follow-up survey3 is currently underway to capture user feedback on the self-certification process.
Conflicts of interest
None declared.
- © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.
References
- ↵
- Joint Royal Colleges of Physicians Training Board (JRCPTB)
20ARCP%20decision%20aid%20for%20Covid%2019%20
pandemic.pdf [Accessed 09 September 2020]. - ↵
- Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine
- ↵COVID self-certification post-completion survey. www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/TBN3SCM [Accessed 2 December 2020].
Article Tools
Citation Manager Formats
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.