Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Value and values

Louella Vaughan
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.ed.9.3.2
Future Healthc J November 2022
Louella Vaughan
Nuffield Trust, London, UK
Roles: FHJ editorial board member and senior clinical fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

When approached to be editor of this special edition of FHJ on ‘values’, I was enthusiastic but a tiny bit anxious. The importance of including concepts of ‘value’ in healthcare has become widely accepted, but how do we define ‘value’? What does it actually mean? The term ‘value-based healthcare’ appears to have been coined by Prof Michael Porter, of Harvard University, who argued for redesigning systems around outcomes that are of ‘value to patients’ and the costs to achieve those outcomes.1 In the American system, this has come to mean payments to physicians for attaining agreed patient-related outcomes and is a riposte to fee-for-service and capitated models of reimbursement, both of which are based around how much healthcare is provided.2 As the NHS delivers healthcare free at the point of service, it has been argued that value-based care in the British context should consider how the national budget can be used to promote better outcomes at population level.3 Still others advocate that both doctors and patients, as individuals, should determine their own ‘values’, with a negotiation as to what the appropriate goals of the therapeutic relationship should be.4

Such a plethora of meanings seemed difficult to contain with a single issue of a journal. What if the authors took such diverse stances on ‘value’ and its role in the delivery of care that we were left with a ‘Humpty Dumpty’ scenario, where the word was stripped of any shared understanding?

We are fortunate, instead, to have a series of articles that not only explore the nuances of the word ‘value’ but also how this might be applied across nearly all aspects of health and care. At the macro-level, Sally Lewis discusses the strengths and limitations of value-based healthcare and whether it might provide a meaningful solution to the problems currently faced by the NHS, while Matilda Allen, Dominique Allwood and Sir Michael Marmot propose reframing our conception of hospitals to places that create value beyond the provision of direct clinical care.5,6 Lorelei Jones explores how different healthcare paradigms demand different frameworks for management and considers the need for incorporating notions of ‘value’ into the governance of integrated care systems.7 How industry contributes to creating and supporting values-based care is discussed by Frédéric Noël.8

Different dimensions of ‘value’ as they relate to patients are explored in two articles. Jennifer Schulz discusses how the concept of ‘value’ to patients and their families after medical injuries has played a role in reforming the legal framework for medical negligence in other jurisdictions and ponders whether a similar change might be good for Britain.9 Rosemary Hollick and Lynn Laidlaw explore the value in patient and public engagement in research and how it can help to move patient and public involvement away from being ‘tokenistic’ towards being an integral part of the process.10

Values and how they play a role in decision making on the acute medical unit are discussed by Luke Martin, while Andrew McLaren, Louise Locock and Zoë Skea explore what doctors value in their own personal and professional lives when it comes to making decisions about where to live and work.11,12

Three themes recur in these very different papers. Firstly, that concepts of value are inherent within medicine and, indeed, underpin it. The shift to value-based medicine is then not so much a radically different system, but rather a way of surfacing what is already there and bringing this to the forefront of our working lives. The second is the necessity of creating and negotiating shared values between doctors and patients and across all the different components and stakeholders within a system. The final point is that despite the barriers to value-based care, it has the promise to be truly revolutionary. Beyond the obvious benefits of more efficient and effective patient-oriented care, it might just be the antidote to the burnout and exhaustion experienced by a workforce that is currently stretched like never before. It might be a pathway back to joy and satisfaction in the working lives of doctors and other medical professionals.

In the end, I ought not to have been worried; this was the easiest editorial task I have ever been assigned. This was no doubt in part to my co-editor, Suzie Bailey, whose enthusiasm was infectious. But also because this is the first time every author met every deadline and we actually had people volunteering to make contributions. This demonstrates the appetite for a bigger conversation about values.

We hope that this collection of articles has stretched the boundaries about what value-based care might mean for the NHS and other healthcare systems across the world. It has certainly stimulated me to think. We hope it does the same for individual doctors, managers and leaders as well.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2022. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Porter ME
    , Teisbert EO. Redefining health care: creating value-based competition on results. Harvard Business Review Press, 2006.
  2. ↵
    1. NEJM Catalyst
    . What is value-based healthcare? NEJM Catalyst 2017.
  3. ↵
    1. Gray M
    . Value based healthcare. BMJ 2017;356:j437.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Tseng EK
    , Hicks LK. Value based care and patient-centered care: divergent or complementary? Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2016;11:303–10.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Lewis S
    . Value-based healthcare: is it the way forward? FHJ 2022;9:211–5.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Allen M
    , Allwood D, Marmot M. Taking one step further: how hospitals as anchor institutions deliver wider value through equity. FHJ 2022;9:216–21.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Jones L
    . Including a wider range of values in healthcare policy: how can public value evaluation help? FHJ 2022;9:222–5.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Noël F
    . Accelerating the pace of value-based transformation for more resilient and sustainable healthcare. FHJ 2022;9:226–29.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Schulz JS
    . Reforming clinical negligence in England: lessons about patients' and providers' values from medical injury resolution in New Zealand and the United States of America. FHJ 2022;9:230–7.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Laidlaw L
    , Hollick RJ. Values and value in patient and public involvement: moving beyond methods. FHJ 2022;9:238–42.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Martin LPJ
    . What matters in acute care? Values and decision making in the acute medical unit. FHJ 2022;9:243–7.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. McLaren AS
    , Locock L, Skea Z. Valuing place in doctors' decisions to work in remote and rural locations. FHJ 2022;9:248–51.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Value and values
Future Healthc J Nov 2022, 9 (3) 209-210; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.ed.9.3.2

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Value and values
Future Healthc J Nov 2022, 9 (3) 209-210; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.ed.9.3.2
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What matters most?
  • Moving forward in the right direction
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians