Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Improving the standard of discharge summaries using a quality improvement approach

Thomas Shepherd, Caitriona Stapleton, Sara Khalid, Bryony Dayment, Alex Moate, Ellen Benn, Catrin Jones-Evans, Charu Kayan, Kirsten Fernandes, Sandra Mohamed, Phoebe Scarfield and Jasmine Lee
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.9-2-s105
Future Healthc J July 2022
Thomas Shepherd
ALewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caitriona Stapleton
ALewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara Khalid
ALewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bryony Dayment
ALewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex Moate
ALewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ellen Benn
ALewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catrin Jones-Evans
BGKT School of Medical Education, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charu Kayan
BGKT School of Medical Education, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirsten Fernandes
ALewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandra Mohamed
ALewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Phoebe Scarfield
ALewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jasmine Lee
ALewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

Discharge summaries are an important handover tool used to ensure effective communication of clinical information between secondary and primary care. Poor discharge summary completion can have a negative impact on the safe transfer of care, quality of clinical care, and patient safety. GP quality alerts, patient safety incidents and patient advice and liaison services (PALS) complaints within the trust had highlighted concerns regarding discharge summaries. Our aim was to improve the standard of discharge summaries on the acute medical unit (AMU) using a quality improvement (QI) approach.

Materials and methods

Our multidisciplinary team (MDT) included two medical students, a physician associate, four junior doctors, a consultant physician, a GP, a pharmacist, a quality improvement adviser, and a patient representative.

Using guidance from the Professional Records Standard Body (PRSB) and the Royal College of Physicians (RCP), 10 core components of a discharge summary were identified (Box 1).1,2 Process mapping, feedback questionnaires and driver diagrams were used to visualise the discharge process, identify areas of concern and develop ideas for change.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Box 1.

The 10 core components of discharge summaries

Using an MS Excel spreadsheet, the total average compliance of 10 randomly selected discharge summaries was calculated weekly, as well as the average compliance for each of the 10 core components. Data was uploaded to LifeQI software to track in real time and visualise data shifts.

We completed four plan, do, study, act (PDSA) intervention cycles during the project: the introduction of a discharge summary template, sharing patient feedback, sharing pharmacist feedback, and sharing combined patient and GP feedback. Formal feedback surveys were performed to monitor discharge summary satisfaction from GPs, district nurses and patients. Our patient representative took an active role to ensure a patient focus by designing the patient feedback questionnaire.

Results and discussion

The baseline compliance of discharge summaries was 61% measured in April 2021; this improved to an average compliance of 92% following our first PDSA intervention in June 2021. We subsequently achieved a compliance of 91% following both our second and third PDSA cycles. Our fourth cycle achieved a compliance of 93%. We have achieved sustained improvement from a baseline mean compliance of 70% to a mean of 85% (Fig 1).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Run chart displaying the average discharge summary compliance measured weekly.

Patient feedback has been positive, with 93% (n=15) reporting that discharge summaries were easy to understand. There have been no further GP quality alerts or patient safety incidents relating to discharge summaries on the ward, and a 70% reduction within the wider hospital.

Conclusion

This project has shown significant improvement in discharge summary quality as measured by our 10 core components. We anticipate that sustaining improvements will be a challenge requiring significant behavioural change. The project is now being expanded into the Paediatrics Department and Community Response Teams within the trust. Our next goal is to expand this project further throughout multiple trusts. Widespread adoption of such changes will improve patient safety and satisfaction.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2022. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Professional Record Standards Body
    . Implementation guidance report eDischarge standard. V2.1. PRSB, January 2019: p14.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Royal College of Physicians Health Informatics Unit
    . Improving discharge summaries – learning resource: guidance for trainees. London: RCP, 2019. www.rcplondon.ac.uk/guidelines-policy/improving-discharge-summaries-learning-resource-materials [Accessed 8 February 2022].
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Improving the standard of discharge summaries using a quality improvement approach
Thomas Shepherd, Caitriona Stapleton, Sara Khalid, Bryony Dayment, Alex Moate, Ellen Benn, Catrin Jones-Evans, Charu Kayan, Kirsten Fernandes, Sandra Mohamed, Phoebe Scarfield, Jasmine Lee
Future Healthc J Jul 2022, 9 (Suppl 2) 105-106; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.9-2-s105

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Improving the standard of discharge summaries using a quality improvement approach
Thomas Shepherd, Caitriona Stapleton, Sara Khalid, Bryony Dayment, Alex Moate, Ellen Benn, Catrin Jones-Evans, Charu Kayan, Kirsten Fernandes, Sandra Mohamed, Phoebe Scarfield, Jasmine Lee
Future Healthc J Jul 2022, 9 (Suppl 2) 105-106; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.9-2-s105
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results and discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Telecommunication during COVID-19: a multicentre quality improvement project
  • Modernising the weekend medical handover
  • Medical handover QIP
Show more QUALITY IMPROVEMENT AND PATIENT SAFETY

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians