Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

The FY101 handbook

Peter Pereira, Hushil Sandhu and Athinyaa Thiaraviaraj
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.9-2-s38
Future Healthc J July 2022
Peter Pereira
ANorthern Ireland Medical and Dental Training Agency, Belfast, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hushil Sandhu
ANorthern Ireland Medical and Dental Training Agency, Belfast, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Athinyaa Thiaraviaraj
ANorthern Ireland Medical and Dental Training Agency, Belfast, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

75% of UK medical graduates report a lack of preparedness in transitioning into their job as a junior doctor.1 This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a locally developed handbook and its impact on the increase in confidence levels of new practising F1 doctors in Altnagelvin Hospital, Londonderry, Northern Ireland.

Methods

The handbook was developed based on feedback from F1s from two different cohorts, and the content of the handbook was then reviewed by senior members of the multidisciplinary team. The handbook was also created in line with the current Foundation Curriculum. Feedback was collected prior to starting F1 and 3 months post-implementation of the handbook. The questionnaire was designed to assess levels of confidence among the F1s, the content of the handbook and how to improve the quality of the handbook.

Results

A total of 27 participants were included in this study. Cohort 1 consist of ten F1 doctors who started in August 2020, who acted as the ‘control’ group. Cohort 2 consist of 17 F1 doctors who started in August 2021, after the handbook had been implemented. There was an increase in confidence from 24% (n=4) to 100% (n=17) in Cohort 2, 3 months after starting F1, compared with the control group, where there was an increase from 10% (n=1) to 90% (n=9). The confidence in requesting consults increased from 24% (n=4) to 100% (n=17) in Cohort 2, while the confidence increased from 40% (n=4) to 80% (n=8) in Cohort 1. The confidence in answering bleeps out of hours increased from 18% (n=3) to 100% (n=17) in Cohort 2, compared with an increase in confidence from 30% (n=3) to 80% (n=8) in Cohort 1. The confidence in prescribing common medications increased from 24% (n=4) to 95% (n=16) in Cohort 1 compared with from 50% (n=5) to 100% (n=10) seen in Cohort 2.

Conclusion

This study has clearly shown the impact on the increase in confidence in new F1 doctors at the start of their careers and their transition from medical school. This handbook also covers most of the Higher Level Outcomes, which are clearly outlined in the Foundation Curriculum. This handbook is equipped with relevant clinical information revised by senior clinicians aimed to support trainees. It takes the theoretical knowledge learned in medical school refines it to guide trainees around the practical aspect of caring for patients in a clinical setting.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2022. All rights reserved.

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Monrouxe L
    , Grundy L, Mann M, et al. How prepared are UK medical graduates for practice? A rapid review of the literature 2009–2014. BMJ Open 2017;7:e013656.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The FY101 handbook
Peter Pereira, Hushil Sandhu, Athinyaa Thiaraviaraj
Future Healthc J Jul 2022, 9 (Suppl 2) 38; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.9-2-s38

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The FY101 handbook
Peter Pereira, Hushil Sandhu, Athinyaa Thiaraviaraj
Future Healthc J Jul 2022, 9 (Suppl 2) 38; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.9-2-s38
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • Reference
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Application support for IMT: a bridge towards a future career
  • Virtual MRCP1 course for internal medicine trainees across West Midlands Deanery
  • Smoking cessation training for foundation year doctors: a positive step towards a smoke-free society
Show more Education, training and professionalism

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians