Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Urgent suspected cancer referrals in a district general hospital: a re-audit of referrals and comparison to NICE guidelines

Hua Ting, Rhys Morris and Juergen Brand
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.9-2-s93
Future Healthc J July 2022
Hua Ting
AGlangwili General Hospital, Carmarthen, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rhys Morris
AGlangwili General Hospital, Carmarthen, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juergen Brand
AGlangwili General Hospital, Carmarthen, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Introduction

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria for referring urgent suspected cancer (USC) cases have been developed to facilitate and streamline the pathway for patients thought to have a possible malignancy.1 In a previous audit of the radiology department in a district general hospital in 2018 there were 157 referrals over a 1-month period with 31 cases (19.7%) not meeting NICE criteria. Demands on the NHS have subsequently been exacerbated greatly by the COVID-19 pandemic, and waiting lists are at record levels.2 The primary aims of this re-audit are to ascertain changes in the volume of referrals received, and imaging performed in the radiology department. Secondary aims included whether the referrals met NICE criteria and were performed and reported within 14 daysof request.

Materials and methods

Patient data was collected prospectively for USC referrals over 1 month (1–30 November 2021 inclusive) for the radiology department. Exclusion criteria included patients who subsequently declined imaging, imaging that was cancelled for clinical reasons, and requests received outside of the aforementioned dates. Clinical and radiology results were evaluated via the appropriate electronic platforms (Welsh clinical portal and Synapse respectively) and added to a database for subsequent analysis.

Results and discussion

A total of 293 referrals were received during the study period with 269 cases being imaged (135 men (50%), mean age 66 years (16–97)) representing a 72% increase in imaging compared with the previous audit. Of those imaged, 61 cases (23%) did not meet NICE criteria compared with 19% in 2018. The most common indication in these patients was staging for a previously diagnosed malignancy (45 cases; 74%). The imaging modalities used were computed tomography (155 cases, magnetic resonance imaging 54, ultrasound 60). Overall, 129 cases (48%) were imaged and 107 cases (40%) reported within 14 days of the request.

Conclusion

The volume of routine work in radiology has been increasing for several years,3 and the backlog of elective work in the NHS has been greatly exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results show the volume of imaging performed for USC referrals in our unit has increased by 72% compared with 2018. Almost a quarter of these cases (23%) did not meet NICE criteria with the most common indication being staging for a previously diagnosed malignancy. Overall, less than half of cases were imaged and reported within 14 days which may contribute to delays in the diagnosis and management of suspected cancer cases.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2022. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
    Suspected cancer: recognition and referral: NICE guideline [NG12]. NICE, 2021. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng12 [Accessed 7 February 2022].
  2. ↵
    1. Iacobucci G
    . Covid-19: all non-urgent elective surgery is suspended for at least three months in England. BMJ 2020;368:m1106.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Rimmer A
    . Radiologist shortage leaves patient care at risk, warns royal college. BMJ 2017;359:j4683.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Urgent suspected cancer referrals in a district general hospital: a re-audit of referrals and comparison to NICE guidelines
Hua Ting, Rhys Morris, Juergen Brand
Future Healthc J Jul 2022, 9 (Suppl 2) 93; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.9-2-s93

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Urgent suspected cancer referrals in a district general hospital: a re-audit of referrals and comparison to NICE guidelines
Hua Ting, Rhys Morris, Juergen Brand
Future Healthc J Jul 2022, 9 (Suppl 2) 93; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.9-2-s93
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results and discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Improving the provision and quality of safety netting instructions for patients seen in same-day emergency care (SDEC)
  • The impact of a smoking cessation programme on referrals in a cardiorespiratory admissions unit
  • Improving fluid balance charts through staff education on a general medical ward: a quality improvement project
Show more QUALITY IMPROVEMENT AND PATIENT SAFETY

Similar Articles

FAQs

  • Difficulty logging in.

There is currently no login required to access the journals. Please go to the home page and simply click on the edition that you wish to read. If you are still unable to access the content you require, please let us know through the 'Contact us' page.

  • Can't find the CME questionnaire.

The read-only self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) can be found after the CME section in each edition of Clinical Medicine. RCP members and fellows (using their login details for the main RCP website) are able to access the full SAQ with answers and are awarded 2 CPD points upon successful (8/10) completion from:  https://cme.rcplondon.ac.uk

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians