Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Towards a standardised method of patient prioritisation that accounts for clinical harm

Rowan Wathes, Karina Malhotra, Kelsey Flott, Arup Nath and Catherine Urch
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2020-0109
Future Healthc J February 2021
Rowan Wathes
AThe PSC, London, UK
Roles: consultant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rowan.wathes@gmail.com
Karina Malhotra
BAcumentice Health, London, UK
Roles: RTT improvement partner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelsey Flott
CImperial College London, London, UK
Roles: policy fellow and patient safety lead
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arup Nath
AThe PSC, London, UK
Roles: consultant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Urch
Dcardiovascular and cancer and trust cancer lead, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Roles: divisional director for surgery
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

COVID-19 has highlighted the need for a standardised approach for prioritising patients requiring elective care. The Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) developed guidance at the start of the pandemic for prioritising surgical patients based on the urgency of different procedures. Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (ICHT) has extended this to all aspects of elective care to enable standardised decision-making based on clinical priority, clinical harm and patient vulnerability. This was a clinically led project that involved close collaboration with lay partners, who were concerned that the RCS guidance lacked the sensitivity to reflect individual patients' needs. Our novel elective care recovery matrix is designed to be applicable across all elective care services and at Trust or system level. Implementation at ICHT progressed rapidly: as of 28 August 2020 >200 consultants have received training on the process and 58% of all surgical orders have been prioritised using the new framework (5,134/8,800). While COVID-19 was the driver, the applicability can be wider and could inform new ways of working. The framework enables rapid quantification of individual patient care requirements, thus enabling clinicians to target more accurately those patients with the greatest need and those who would see the greatest benefit.

KEYWORDS
  • COVID-19
  • prioritisation
  • elective care
  • cancer
  • framework
  • © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Towards a standardised method of patient prioritisation that accounts for clinical harm
Rowan Wathes, Karina Malhotra, Kelsey Flott, Arup Nath, Catherine Urch
Future Healthc J Feb 2021, fhj.2020-0109; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2020-0109

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Towards a standardised method of patient prioritisation that accounts for clinical harm
Rowan Wathes, Karina Malhotra, Kelsey Flott, Arup Nath, Catherine Urch
Future Healthc J Feb 2021, fhj.2020-0109; DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2020-0109
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Perspective: Vitamin D supplementation prevents rickets and acute respiratory infections when given as daily maintenance but not as intermittent bolus: implications for COVID-19
  • Admission COVID-19 clinical risk assessment for guiding patient placement and diagnostic testing strategy
  • Contact tracing for SARS-CoV-2: what can be learned from other conditions?
Show more COVID-19 rapid report

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians