TY - JOUR T1 - Selecting specialist registrars by station interview JF - Clinical Medicine JO - Clin Med SP - 279 LP - 280 DO - 10.7861/clinmedicine.6-3-279 VL - 6 IS - 3 AU - Pem Smith AU - FD Dunstan AU - CM Wiles Y1 - 2006/05/01 UR - http://www.rcpjournals.org/content/6/3/279.abstract N2 - Appointments to the specialist registrar (SpR) grade depend almost entirely on performance at interview, yet standard panel interviews do not directly assess the competences required of a medical trainee. In this study, station interviews were used to select neurology SpRs. Eighteen candidates were assessed in three interviews, each involving three stations: a curriculum vitae (CV)-based interview, an interview with a simulated patient, and a discussion of scenarios based upon teaching, audit and research. Two or three assessors at each station ranked candidates independently before discussing the pooled rankings and reading written references. The CV-based interview rankings (resembling a traditional panel interview) correlated less well with the overall rankings (r=0.54) than did research (r=0.83), information giving (r=0.75), audit (r=0.70) or teaching presentation (r=0.59). Station interviews appear fairer (providing more time, more independent examiners, fresh starts at each station), although they require more planning and expense. Competency-based assessments should be more widely used in selecting medical trainees. ER -