Table 2.

Summary of responses by vignette.

VignetteAdmission deemed inappropriate, n/N (%)Problem could be managed in care-home or as an outpatient, n/N (%)Admission not appropriate for the individual patient, n/N (%)
1: advanced dementia with behavioural disturbance
 Overall47/50 (94)44/47 (94)47/47 (100)
 Primary care18/18 (100)
 Secondary care29/32 (91)
2: reduced mobility and hip pain in a patient with dementia
 Overall14/50 (28)9/14 (64)9/14 (64)
 Primary care5/18 (28)
 Secondary care9/32 (28)
3: dementia with loss of safe swallow
 Overall34/50 (68)29/34 (85)32/34 (94)
 Primary care16/18 (89)
 Secondary care18/32 (56)
4: exacerbation of chronic condition (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
 Overall20/50 (40)18/20 (90)17/20 (85)
 Primary care9/18 (50)
 Secondary care11/32 (34)
5: acute problem requiring procedural skill (urinary retention)
 Overall26/50 (52)24/26 (92)21/26 (81)
 Primary care10/18 (56)
 Secondary care16/32 (50)
6: exacerbation of chronic condition (single self-terminating seizure in patient with epilepsy)
 Overall25/48 (52)21/25 (84)20/25 (80)
 Primary care10/18 (56)
 Secondary care15/30 (50)
7: probable iatrogenic harm (minor haematemesis in patient with polypharmacy)
 Overall21/48 (44)16/21 (76)20/21 (95)
 Primary care10/17 (59)
 Secondary care11/29 (38)
All combined
 Overall189/346 (55)161/189 (85)166/189 (88)
 Primary care78/125 (62)
 Secondary care109/221 (49)
  • Data are n/N (%). Primary care includes care-home-liaison nurses and specialist GPs; secondary care includes emergency medicine specialists, geriatricians and general medical physicians. In columns three and four, only responses by those who deemed the admission inappropriate are included.