Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers on the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers β-amyloid1–42 (Aβ1–42), total tau protein (T-tau), and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (P-tau181P) are gradually finding their way into routine clinical practice as an affirmative diagnostic tool for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). These biomarkers have also been implemented in the revised diagnostic criteria for AD.

The combination of the CSF biomarkers Aβ1–42, T-tau, and P-tau181P leads to high (around 80%) levels of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for discrimination between AD and controls (including psychiatric disorders like depression) and can be applied for diagnosing AD in the predementia phases of the disease (mild cognitive impairment). The added value of CSF biomarkers could lie within those cases in which the clinical diagnostic work-up is not able to discriminate between AD and non-AD dementias. However, their discriminatory power for the differential diagnosis of dementia is suboptimal. Other CSF biomarkers, especially those that are reflective of the pathology of non-AD dementia etiologies, could improve the accuracy of differential dementia diagnosis.

CSF biomarkers will be of help to establish a correct and early AD diagnosis, even in the preclinical stages of the disease, which will be of importance once disease-modifying drugs for AD become available. Variation in biomarker measurements still jeopardize the introduction of CSF biomarkers into routine clinical practice and clinical trials, but several national and international standardization initiatives are ongoing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alzheimer’s Disease International. The global prevalence of dementia. In: Prince M, Jackson J, editors. World Alzheimer report 2009. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International; 2009: 25–46

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alzheimer’s Association, Thies W, Bleiler L. 2011 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2011 Mar; 7 (2): 208–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 1984 Jul; 34 (7): 939–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Knopman DS, Dekosky ST, Cummings JL, et al. Practice parameter: diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2001 May; 56 (9): 1143–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. The Ronald and Nancy Reagan Research Institute of the Alzheimer’s Association and the National Institute on Aging Working Group. Consensus report of the Working Group on: “Molecular and Biochemical Markers of Alzheimer’s Disease” [published erratum appears in Neurobiol Aging 1998 May–Jun; 19 (3): 285]. Neurobiol Aging 1998 Mar; 19 (2): 109–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blennow K, Hampel H. CSF markers for incipient Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol 2003 Oct; 2 (10): 605–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vanderstichele H, De Meyer G, Shapiro F, et al. Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers: from concept to clinical utility. In: Galimberti D, Scarpini E, editors. Biomarkers for early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2008: 81–122

    Google Scholar 

  8. Olsson A, Vanderstichele H, Andreasen N, et al. Simultaneous measurement of beta-amyloid(1–42), total tau, and phosphorylated tau (Thr181) in cerebrospinal fluid by the xMAP technology. Clin Chem 2005 Feb; 51 (2): 336–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schoonenboom NS, Pijnenburg YA, Mulder C, et al. Amyloid beta(1–42) and phosphorylated tau in CSF as markers for early-onset Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2004 May; 62 (9): 1580–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Engelborghs S, De Vreese K, Van de Casteele T, et al. Diagnostic performance of a CSF-biomarker panel in autopsy-confirmed dementia. Neurobiol Aging 2008; 29: 1143–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sunderland T, Linker G, Mirza N, et al. Decreased beta-amyloid 1–42 and increased tau levels in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer disease. JAMA 2003 Apr; 289 (16): 2094–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hulstaert F, Blennow K, Ivanoiu A, et al. Improved discrimination of AD patients using beta-amyloid(1–42) and tau levels in CSF. Neurology 1999 May; 52 (8): 1555–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Andreasen N, Minthon L, Davidsson P, et al. Evaluation of CSF-tau and CSF-Abeta42 as diagnostic markers for Alzheimer disease in clinical practice. Arch Neurol 2001 Mar; 58 (3): 373–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell AJ, Shiri-Feshki M. Rate of progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia: meta-analysis of 41 robust inception cohort studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2009 Apr; 119 (4): 252–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Price JL, McKeel Jr DW, Buckles VD, et al. Neuropathology of nondemented aging: presumptive evidence for preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurobiol Aging 2009 Apr; 30 (7): 1026–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansson O, Zetterberg H, Buchhave P, et al. Association between CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer’s disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a follow-up study. Lancet Neurol 2006 Mar; 5 (3): 228–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mattsson N, Zetterberg H, Hansson O, et al. CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. JAMA 2009 Jul; 302 (4): 385–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Visser PJ, Verhey F, Knol DL, et al. Prevalence and prognostic value of CSF markers of Alzheimer’s disease pathology in patients with subjective cognitive impairment or mild cognitive impairment in the DESCRIPA study: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2009 Jul; 8 (7): 619–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. De Meyer G, Shapiro F, Vanderstichele H, et al. Diagnosis-independent Alzheimer disease biomarker signature in cognitively normal elderly people. Arch Neurol 2010 Aug; 67 (8): 949–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fagan AM, Roe CM, Xiong C, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid tau/beta-amyloid(42) ratio as a prediction of cognitive decline in nondemented older adults. Arch Neurol 2007 Mar; 64 (3): 343–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Le Bastard N, De Deyn PP, Engelborghs S. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of dementia. Current Medical Literature — Neurology 2009; 25 (3): 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Blennow K, Hampel H, Weiner M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 2010 Mar; 6 (3): 131–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schoonenboom NS, Reesink FE, Verwey NA, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid markers for differential dementia diagnosis in a large memory clinic cohort. Neurology 2012 Jan; 78 (1): 47–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Blennow K, Johansson A, Zetterberg H. Diagnostic value of 14-3-3 beta immunoblot and T-tau/P-tau ratio in clinically suspected Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Int J Mol Med 2005 Dec; 16 (6): 1147–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. de Jong D, Jansen RW, Kremer BP, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta42/phosphorylated tau ratio discriminates between Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006 Jul; 61 (7): 755–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Le Bastard N, Martin JJ, Vanmechelen E, et al. Added diagnostic value of CSF biomarkers in differential dementia diagnosis. Neurobiol Aging 2010 Nov; 31 (11): 1867–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Echavarri C, Caballero MC, Aramendia A, et al. Multiprotein deposits in neurodegenerative disorders: our experience in the tissue brain bank of Navarra. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2011 Jul; 294 (7): 1191–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ballard C, Ziabreva I, Perry R, et al. Differences in neuropathologic characteristics across the Lewy body dementia spectrum. Neurology 2006 Dec; 67(11): 1931–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Maetzler W, Liepelt I, Reimold M, et al. Cortical PIB binding in Lewy body disease is associated with Alzheimer-like characteristics. Neurobiol Dis 2009 Apr; 34 (1): 107–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Slaets S, Engelborghs S, Le Bastard N, et al. Influence of AD pathology on CSF biomarkers in autopsy-confirmed dementia with Lewy bodies patients [abstract no. P1–113]. Alzheimers Dement 2011 Jul; 7 (4 Suppl.): S146.

    Google Scholar 

  31. De Reuck J, Deramecourt V, Cordonnier C, et al. Prevalence of small cerebral bleeds in patients with a neurodegenerative dementia: a neuropathological study. J Neurol Sci 2011 Jan; 300 (1–2): 63–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Arai T, Mackenzie IR, Hasegawa M, et al. Phosphorylated TDP-43 in Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Acta Neuropathol 2009 Feb; 117(2): 125–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tapiola T, Overmyer M, Lehtovirta M, et al. The level of cerebrospinal fluid tau correlates with neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroreport 1997 Dec; 8 (18): 3961–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Engelborghs S, Sleegers K, Cras P, et al. No association of CSF biomarkers with APOEepsilon4, plaque and tangle burden in definite Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2007 Sep; 130 (Pt 9): 2320–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Strozyk D, Blennow K, White LR, et al. CSF Abeta 42 levels correlate with amyloid-neuropathology in a population-based autopsy study. Neurology 2003 Feb; 60 (4): 652–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Buerger K, Ewers M, Pirttila T, et al. CSF phosphorylated tau protein correlates with neocortical neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2006 Nov; 129 (Pt 11): 3035–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Iqbal K, Flory M, Khatoon S, et al. Subgroups of Alzheimer’s disease based on cerebrospinal fluid molecular markers. Ann Neurol 2005 Nov; 58 (5): 748–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. van der Vlies AE, Verwey NA, Bouwman FH, et al. CSF biomarkers in relationship to cognitive profiles in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2009 Mar; 72 (12): 1056–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. van Norden AG, van Dijk EJ, de Laat KF, et al. Dementia: Alzheimer pathology and vascular factors. From mutually exclusive to interaction. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012 Mar; 1822 (3): 340–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Engelborghs S, Le Bastard N, Feyen B, et al. Overdiagnosis of vascular dementia using structural brain imaging in the context of standard clinical diagnostic criteria. Alzheimers Dement 2011 Jul; 7 (4 Suppl.): S338–9.

  41. Shaw LM, Vanderstichele H, Knapik-Czajka M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative subjects. Ann Neurol 2009 Apr; 65 (4): 403–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011 May; 7 (3): 263–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Albert MS, Dekosky ST, Dickson D, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011 May; 7 (3): 270–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011 May; 7 (3): 280–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Verwey NA, van der Flier WM, Blennow K, et al. A worldwide multicentre comparison of assays for cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Clin Biochem 2009 May; 46 (Pt 3): 235–40.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mattsson N, Andreasson U, Persson S, et al. The Alzheimer’s Association external quality control program for cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. Alzheimers Dement 2011 Jul; 7 (4): 386–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Vanderstichele H, Bibl M, Engelborghs S, et al. Standardization of preanalytical aspects of cerebospinal fluid biomarker testing for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis: a consensus paper of the Alzheimer’s Biomarkers Standardization Initiative. Alzheimers Dement 2012 Jan; 8 (1): 65–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bibl M, Esselmann H, Otto M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta peptide patterns in Alzheimer’s disease patients and nondemented controls depend on sample pretreatment: indication of carrier-mediated epitope masking of amyloid beta peptides. Electrophoresis 2004 Sep; 25 (17): 2912–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Schoonenboom NS, Mulder C, Vanderstichele H, et al. Differences and similarities between two frequently used assays for amyloid beta 42 in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Chem 2005 Jun; 51 (6): 1057–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lewczuk P, Beck G, Esselmann H, et al. Effect of sample collection tubes on cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of tau proteins and amyloid beta peptides. Clin Chem 2006 Feb; 52 (2): 332–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Bjerke M, Portelius E, Minthon L, et al. Confounding factors influencing amyloid beta concentration in cerebrospinal fluid. Int J Alzheimers Dis 2010 Jul 15; pii: 986310.

  52. Perret-Liaudet A, Pelpel M, Tholance Y, et al. Risk of Alzheimer’s disease biological misdiagnosis linked to cerebrospinal collection tubes. J Alzheimers Dis. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

  53. Teunissen CE, Verwey NA, Kester MI, et al. Standardization of assay procedures for analysis of the CSF biomarkers amyloid β((1–42)), tau, and phosphorylated tau in Alzheimer’s disease: report of an international workshop. Int J Alzheimers Dis 2010 Sep 27; pii: 635053.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research performed by the authors was supported by the Special Research Fund of the University of Antwerp; the Foundation for Alzheimer Research (SAO-FRMA); the Institute Born-Bunge; the agreement between the Institute Born-Bunge and the University of Antwerp; the central Biobank facility of the Institute Born-Bunge/University of Antwerp; the Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders (FWO–V); the Interuniversity Attraction Poles (IAP) Program P6/43 of the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office; and the Methusalem Excellence Grant of the Flemish Government, Belgium.

Sebastiaan Engelborghs and Nathalie Le Bastard have served as advisory board members for Innogenetics NV. The authors report no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastiaan Engelborghs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engelborghs, S., Le Bastard, N. The Impact of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers on the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol Diagn Ther 16, 135–141 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262201

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262201

Keywords

Navigation