Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy as the primary method for investigating colorectal symptoms in low-risk patients

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Flexible sigmoidoscopy as the preferred initial investigation for patients with low-risk colorectal symptoms requires formal evaluation.

Methods

From August 1999 to July 2001, 323 patients (166 men) attended the one-stop colorectal clinic. All the patients were examined using a 60-cm flexible sigmoidoscope. Presenting symptoms and findings were reviewed.

Results

The mean age of the study patients was 38.6 ± 11.87 years, with the majority (89.1%) younger than 50 years. Rectal bleeding was the most common problem (86.6%), followed by bowel habit change (13.7%). For 65.6% of the patients, a view to the proximal sigmoid was obtained. The main reason for incomplete assessment was poor bowel preparation (67.5%). The most common finding, in 202 patients (64%), was haemorrhoids. Polyps were found in 9.9% of the patients, whereas four patients (1.2%) with cancer were identified. Overall, 269 patients (83.4%) required no further investigation.

Conclusion

Flexible sigmoidoscopy is an effective method for assessing low-risk patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chapuis PH, Goulston KJ, Dent OF, Tait AD (1985) Predictive value of rectal bleeding in screening for rectal and sigmoid polyps. Br Med J 290: 1546–1548

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jones LS, Nicholson RW, Evans DA (2001) Experience with a one-stop colorectal clinic. J R Coll Surg Edinb 46: 96–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kee F, Wilson RH, Gilliland R, Sloan JM, Rowlands BJ, Moorehead RJ (1992) Changing site distribution of colorectal cancer. Br Med J 305: 158

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maule WF (1994) Screening for colorectal cancer by nurse endoscopists. N Engl J Med 330: 183–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McCallion K, Mitchell RM, Wilson RH, Kee F, Watson RG, Collins JS, Gardiner KR (2001) Flexible sigmoidoscopy and the changing distribution of colorectal cancer: implications for screening. Gut 48: 522–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McCallum RW, Meyer CT, Marignani P, Cane E, Contino C (1984) Flexible sigmoidoscopy: diagnostic yield in 1,015 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 79: 433–437

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Niv Y, Asaf V (1992) Open-access, flexible, fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy in a regional primary care clinic. J Clin Gastroenterol 15: 218–221

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Toomey P, Asimakopoulos G, Zbar A, Kmiot W (1998) “One-stop” rectal bleeding clinics without routine flexible sigmoidoscopy are unsafe. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80: 131–133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Underwood D, Makar R, Najfi SM, Neilly PJD, Gilliland R (2002) Prospective randomised single blind trial of Fleet phosphate enema versus glycerin suppositories as preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy. Colorect Dis 4: 15

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vellacott KD, Roe AM, Mortensen NJMcC (1987) An evaluation of a direct-access flexible fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy service. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 69: 149–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Gilliland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badger, S.A., Gilliland, R. & Neilly, P.J.D. The effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy as the primary method for investigating colorectal symptoms in low-risk patients. Surg Endosc 19, 1349–1352 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2215-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2215-2

Keywords

Navigation