Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Self-administration of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy and risk of catheter-related adverse events: a retrospective cohort study

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite increasing use, limited data has been published comparing safety of different outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) models. Potential risks of self-administration at home include venous access device infection and other line complications. This study aims to investigate rates and predictors of intravenous access device complications in a large OPAT cohort. This is a retrospective cohort study of all uses of midlines, peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and tunnelled central venous catheters (TCVCs) with univariate and multivariate (logistic regression) analysis of factors associated with line infections (LIs) and with other line events (OLEs). On univariate analysis, line infections were associated with length of line use, female sex and TCVC lines (compared to midlines). Patients self-administering OPAT in the home had a non-significantly lower rate of LIs. On multivariate analysis only duration of line use was a significant predictor of LIs—OR 1.012 (95%CI 1.001–1.023). For OLEs, multivariate analysis suggested that only line type and use of flucloxacillin were significant explanatory variables. In this cohort, there is no evidence that self-administration of OPAT is associated with higher rates of venous access device complications after controlling for confounding variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Esposito S, Noviello S, Leone S et al (2004) Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) in different countries: a comparison. Int J Antimicrob 24(5):473–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Paladino JA, Poretz D (2010) Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy today. Clin Infect Dis 51(Suppl 2):S198–S208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Upton A, Ellis-Pegler RB, Woodhouse A (2004) Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT): a review of experience at Auckland Hospital. N Z Med J 117(1200):U1020

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kieran J, O'Reilly A, Parker J, Clarke S, Bergin C (2009) Self-administered outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a report of three years experience in the Irish healthcare setting. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28(11):1369–1374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilchrist M, Franklin BD, Patel JP (2008) An outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) map to identify risks associated with an OPAT service. J Antimicrob Chemother 62(1):177–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Matthews PC, Conlon CP, Berendt AR et al (2007) Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT): is it safe for selected patients to self-administer at home? A retrospective analysis of a large cohort over 13 years. J Antimicrob Chemother 60(2):356–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dougherty L, Bravery K, Gabriel J et al (2010) Standards for infusion therapy, 3rd edn. Royal College of Nursing, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barr DA, Semple L, Seaton RA. (2012) Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy in a teaching hospital based practice: a retrospective cohort study describing experience and evolution over 10 years. Int J Antimicro Ag. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.01.016

  9. Roszell S, Jones C (2010) Intravenous administration issues: a comparison of intravenous insertions and complications in vancomycin versus other antibiotics. J Infus Nurs 33(2):112–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lanbeck P, Odenholt I, Paulsen O (2002) Antibiotics differ in their tendency to cause infusion phlebitis: a prospective observational study. Scand J Infect Dis 34(7):512–519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E et al (2009) Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 49(1):1–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lam S, Scannell R, Roessler D, Smith MA (1994) Peripherally inserted central catheters in an acute-care hospital. Arch Intern Med 154(16):1833–1837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodwin ML, Carlson I (1993) The peripherally inserted central catheter: a retrospective look at three years of insertions. J Intraven Nurs 16(2):92–103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Funk D, Gray J, Plourde PJ (2001) Two-year trends of peripherally inserted central catheter-line complications at a tertiary-care hospital: role of nursing expertise. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 22(6):377–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Loewenthal MR, Dobson PM, Starkey RE, Dagg SA, Petersen A, Boyle MJ (2002) The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC): a prospective study of its natural history after cubital fossa insertion. Anaesth Intensive Care 30(1):21–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mermel LA, Parenteau S, Tow SM (1995) The risk of midline catheterization in hospitalized patients. A prospective study. Ann Intern Med 123(11):841–844

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cummings M, Hearse N, McCutcheon H, Deuter K (2011) Improving antibiotic treatment outcomes through the implementation of a midline: piloting a change in practice for cystic fibrosis patients. J Vasc Nurs 29(1):11–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goetz AM, Miller J, Wagener MM, Muder RR (1998) Complications related to intravenous midline catheter usage. A 2-year study. J Intraven Nurs 21(2):76–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pikwer A, Akeson J, Lindgren S (2011) Complications associated with peripheral or central routes for central venous cannulation. Anaesthesia 67(1):65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moureau N, Poole S, Murdock MA, Gray SM, Semba CP (2002) Central venous catheters in home infusion care: outcomes analysis in 50,470 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13(10):1009–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leone M, Dillon LR (2008) Catheter outcomes in home infusion. J Infus Nurs 31(2):84–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ (2006) The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc 81(9):1159–1171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tokars JI, Cookson ST, McArthur MA, Boyer CL, McGeer AJ, Jarvis WR (1999) Prospective evaluation of risk factors for bloodstream infection in patients receiving home infusion therapy. Ann Intern Med 131(5):340–347

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49(12):1373–1379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Amodeo MR, Clulow T, Lainchbury J et al (2009) Outpatient intravenous treatment for infective endocarditis: safety, effectiveness and one-year outcomes. J Infect 59(6):387–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bernard L, El H, Pron B et al (2001) Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) for the treatment of osteomyelitis: evaluation of efficacy, tolerance and cost. J Clin Pharm Ther 26(6):445–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fisher DA, Kurup A, Lye D et al (2006) Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in Singapore. Int J Antimicrob Agents 28(6):545–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hitchcock J, Jepson AP, Main J, Wickens HJ (2009) Establishment of an outpatient and home parenteral antimicrobial therapy service at a London teaching hospital: a case series. J Antimicrob Chemother 64(3):630–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoffman-Terry ML, Fraimow HS, Fox TR, Swift BG, Wolf JE (1999) Adverse effects of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy. Am J Med 106(1):44–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lin JW, Kacker A, Anand VK, Levine H (2005) Catheter- and antibiotic-related complications of ambulatory intravenous antibiotic therapy for chronic refractory rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol 19(4):365–369

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nathwani D (2001) The management of skin and soft tissue infections: outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in the United Kingdom. Chemotherapy 47(Suppl 1):17–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Deepamol Matthew and Claire Vallance (OPAT specialist nurses) and Rachel Bell for data entry and maintenance of the electronic database.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brownlee Centre for Infectious Diseases, Gartnavel General Hospital, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0LY, UK

    D. A. Barr, L. Semple & R. A. Seaton

Authors
  1. D. A. Barr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Semple
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. A. Seaton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Barr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barr, D.A., Semple, L. & Seaton, R.A. Self-administration of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy and risk of catheter-related adverse events: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31, 2611–2619 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1604-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1604-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation