Abstract
Chest radiographs are one of the most complex imaging modalities to interpret. The objective of this study was to assess how accurately emergency physicians interpreted chest radiographs in relation to radiologist reports. Radiological descriptions of chest radiographs from 667 emergency department (ED) patients, aged 14 to 84 years, were retrospectively reviewed. The overall level of agreement and agreement for different categories (congestive heart failure, pneumonia, and other) were assessed in 312 cases for which reports were available. Statistical analysis was done using the chi-square test, and interobserver agreement was calculated. The proportion of agreement between emergency physician and radiologist reports for normal, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia cases was 84.3%, 41.4%, and 41.4%, respectively. Emergency department physicians frequently missed specific radiographic abnormalities, and there was considerable discrepancy between their interpretations and those of trained radiologists. The agreement for some diagnostic categories such as pneumonia and congestive heart failure was low. This study’s findings emphasize the need for improving interpretive skills among ED physicians.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
IAEA/WHO Expert Committee (1972) The medical uses of ionizing radiation and radioisotopes. WHO Technical Report Series 492. WHO, Geneva
Evans KT (1977) The radiologist’s dilemma. Br J Radiol 50:299–301
Clinical audit in diagnostic radiology (Editorial). BMJ 2(6085):479–480
Hall FM (1976) Over utilization of radiological examinations. Radiology 120:443–448
Brunswick JE, IIkhanipour K, Seaberg D et al (1996) Radiographic interpretation in the emergency room. Am J Emerg Med 14:346–348. doi:10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90045-5
Mayhue FE, Rust DD, Aldag JC et al (1989) Accuracy of interpretation of emergency department radiographs: effect of confidence levels. Ann Emerg Med 18:826–830. doi:10.1016/S0196-0644(89)80205-7
Preston CA, Marr JJ, Amaraneni KK et al (1998) Reduction of “callbacks” to the ED due to discrepancies in plain radiograph interpretation. Am J Emerg Med 16:160–162. doi:10.1016/S0735-6757(98)90036-5
Espinosa JA, Nalan TW (2000) Reducing errors made by emergency physicians in interpreting radiographs: longitudinal study. BMJ 320:737–740. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.737
de Lacey GJ (1976) Clinical and economic aspects of the use of X-rays in the accident and emergency department. Proc R Soc Med 69(10):758–759
de Lacey GJ, Barker A, Wignall BK, Reddy JR, Harper J (1979) Reasons for requesting radiographs in an accident department. BMJ 1:1595–1597
de Lacey GJ, Brabdbrook S (1979) Rationalizing requests for X-ray examinations of acute ankle injuries. BMJ 1:1597–1598
Brand DA, Frazier WH, Kohlhepp WC et al (1982) A protocol for selecting patients with injured extremities who need X-rays. N Engl J Med 306:333–339
Raison JCA (1976) Medical and legal aspects of the increasing demand for diagnostic radiology. Proc R Soc Med 69:755–756
Lufkin KC, Smith SW, Matticks CA et al (1998) Radiologist’s review of radiographs interpreted confidently by emergency physicians infrequently leads to changes in patient management. Ann Emerg Med 31:202–207. doi:10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70307-5
Campbell SG, Murray DD, Hawass A et al (2005) Agreement between emergency physician diagnosis and radiologist reports in patients discharged from an emergency department with community-acquired pneumonia. Emerg Radiol 11:242–246. doi:10.1007/s10140-005-0413-4
Basulaiman MO, Elzubier AG (1996) X-ray film interpretation by hospital outpatient departments and primary health care center physicians in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 16:629–632
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al aseri, Z. Accuracy of chest radiograph interpretation by emergency physicians. Emerg Radiol 16, 111–114 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-008-0763-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-008-0763-9