Skip to main content
Log in

Analogies in medicine: valuable for learning, reasoning, remembering and naming

  • Reflections
  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analogies are important tools in human reasoning and learning, for resolving problems and providing arguments, and are extensively used in medicine. Analogy and similarity involve a structural alignment or mapping between domains. This cognitive mechanism can be used to make inferences and learn new abstractions. Through analogies, we try to explain a knowledge to be achieved (the target), with pieces of information already familiar to the learner (the source), keeping in mind the constraints of similarity, structure and purpose. The purpose of this essay is to examine the use of analogies in medicine. We provide a brief review of the theoretical basis of analogical reasoning. This theoretical background is discussed in the light of actual examples of analogies retrieved from medical literature. In medicine, analogies have long been used to explain several physiologic and pathologic processes. Besides deeper structural relations, superficial attribute similarity is extensively used in many medical specialties. These attribute similarities are important in naming, categorizing and classifying, and play a role as learning and memorizing tools. Analogies also serve as basis for medical nomenclature. The choice of the source of analogies is highly dependent on cultural background, and may derive from ancient or diverse cultures. Learning by analogies may thus require research on culture diversity in order to establish an adequate justification and to comprehend the purpose of an analogy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, H., Ogala, W. N., & Ibrahim, M. (1992). Culinary metaphors in Western medicine: A dilemma of medical students in Africa. Medical Education, 26, 423–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade-Filho, J. S., & Pena, G. P. (2001). Analogies in medicine. International Journal of Surgical Pathology, 9, 345–346. doi:10.1177/106689690100900417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battistatou, A., Zolota, V., & Scopa, C. (2000). The “Gourmet” pathologist. International Journal Surgical Pathology, 8, 341–342. doi:10.1177/106689690000800416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, S. A., Wendelken, C., Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2005). Analogical reasoning and the prefrontal cortex: Evidence for separable retrieval and integration mechanisms. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 239. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, H. B. (1981). Mechanical and hydraulic analogies in Harvey’s discovery of the circulation. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 36, 260–277. doi:10.1093/jhmas/XXXVI.3.260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R. G. (2001). Cardiovascular pressure-flow relationships: what should be taught? Advances in Physiology Education, 25, 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, C. (1995). Pathologic basis of disease: self assessment and review (4th ed.). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, K., & Blanchette, I. (2001). The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: The case of analogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 334–339. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00) 01698-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eusebi, V., Tallini, G., & Rosai, J. (2004). Nuclear alterations and RET/PTC activation. American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 28, 974–975. doi:10.1097/00000478-200407000-00021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., Neville, A. J., & Norman, G. R. (1998). Exploring the etiology of content specificity: factor influencing analogical transfer and problem solving. Academic Medicine, 73(10), 1–5. doi:10.1097/00001888-199810000-00028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, I. J., & Doley, J. C. (2005). Medical analogies: Their role in teaching dermatology to medical professionals and patients. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 53, 863–866. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2005.04.085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45–56. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, S. (2000). The private life of the brain. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiot, C., Delsanto, P. P., & Deisboeck, T. S. (2007). Morphological instability and cancer invasion: A ‘splashing water drop’ analogy. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modeling, 4, 4. doi:10.1186/1742-4682-4-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, W. (1952). An anatomical disquisition on the motion of the heart and blood in animals. The great books of the western world v.28. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoda, R. S., & Hoda, S. A. (2004). Yet more analogies in cytopathology. Diagnostic Cytopathology, 30, 133. doi:10.1002/dc.10400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1997). The analogical mind. American Psychologist, 52, 35–44. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1952). Principles of psychology. The great books of the Western world v. 53. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.

  • Kunter, K. M. (1997). Eating the curriculum. Academic Medicine, 72, 167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, Y. (2005). “Meaning-making” in language and biology. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 48, 317–27. doi:10.1353/pbm.2005.0076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G., Young, M., & Brooks, L. (2007). Non-analytical models of clinical reasoning: The role of experience. Medical Education, 41, 1140–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, L. R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 398–418. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.3.398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pena, G. P. (2007). In order to make inferences, one has to map relational structures, not mere similarity attributes. Medical Hypotheses, 69, 1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pena, G. P., & Andrade-Filho, J. S. (2006). Implicações cognitivas, filosóficas e educativas do trabalho do patologista. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 30, 76–86. doi:10.1590/S0100-55022006000200010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosai, J. (2004). Rosai and Ackerman’s surgical pathology (9th ed.). Edinburgh: Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, H. A. (1961). The origin of medical terms (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. (2006). Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gil Patrus Pena.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pena, G.P., de Souza Andrade-Filho, J. Analogies in medicine: valuable for learning, reasoning, remembering and naming. Adv in Health Sci Educ 15, 609–619 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9126-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9126-2

Keywords

Navigation