Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Pitfalls of Using Administrative Data for Research

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Seeff LC, Richards TB, Shapiro JA, et al. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC’s survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1670–1677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lieberman D, Nadel M, Smith R, et al. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system (CO-RADS): report of the quality assurance task group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:757–766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Keating NL, Landrum MB, Landon BE, et al. Measuring the quality of diabetes care using administrative data: is there bias? Health Serv Res. 2003;38:1529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lieberman DA, Faigel DO, Logan J, et al. Assessment of colonoscopy quality: results from a multi-center consortium. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:645–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher DA, Grubber JM, Castor JM, Coffman CJ. Ascertainment of colonoscopy indication using administrative data. Dig Dis Sci. 2010. doi:10.1007/s10620-010-1200-y.

  6. Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:73–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heitman SJ, Ronksley PE, Hilsden RJ, Manns BJ, Rostom A, Hemmelgarn BR. Prevalence of adenomas and colorectal cancer in average risk individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepat. 2009;7:1272–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. El-Serag HB, Petersen L, Hampel H, Richardson P, Cooper G. The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2202–2208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Urback DR, Rabeneck L. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer: a population-based, case–control study. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1296–1308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA

    David Lieberman

Authors
  1. David Lieberman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Lieberman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lieberman, D. Pitfalls of Using Administrative Data for Research. Dig Dis Sci 55, 1506–1508 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1246-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1246-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation