Elsevier

Injury

Volume 20, Issue 2, March 1989, Pages 92-93
Injury

Paper
Spinal cord injury: prognostic indicators

https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(89)90148-4Get rights and content

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of 70 patients with closed traumatic incomplete injuries of the spinal cord was performed. Of those presenting with motor sparing, as minimal as muscle flicker, 86 per cent recovered useful motor function. Of those presenting with spinothalamic sensory sparing, as minimal as unilateral sacral sparing, 71 per cent recovered to a similar functional level. While the patients presenting with preservation of only posterior column sensory sparing had the worst prognosis, some still showed important improvement. Meticulous neurological assessment within 72 h of the injury can localize the tract spared and can help with the prognosis in those patients with incomplete lesions.

References (13)

  • G.M. Bedbrook

    Recovery of spinal cord function

    Paraplegia

    (1980)
  • G.M. Bedbrook et al.

    A review of cervical spine injuries with neurological dysfunction

    Paraplegia

    (1982)
  • H.H. Bohlman

    Acute fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine

    J. Bone Joint Surg.

    (1979)
  • H.H. Bohlman et al.

    The results of treatment of acute injuries of the upper thoracic spine with paralysis

    J. Bone Joint Surg.

    (1985)
  • W.F. Collins

    A review and update of experimental and clinical studies of spinal cord injury

    Paraplegia

    (1983)
  • L.D. Dorr et al.

    Clinical review of the early stability of spine injuries

    Spine

    (1982)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (38)

  • Traumatic spinal cord injuries

    2017, Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
    Citation Excerpt :

    The authors have none to declare.1–4,6,9–16,18,20,22,23,34–38,44–47

  • Influence of Age Alone, and Age Combined With Pinprick, on Recovery of Walking Function in Motor Complete, Sensory Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

    2016, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Citation Excerpt :

    Supporting the earlier conclusion by Crozier et al,7 Waters et al12 observed that subjects with Frankel grade B with bilateral sacral pin sensation had greater recovery than subjects with Frankel grade A and cautioned that Frankel grades A and B should not be grouped in clinical trials. If the Frankel grade D used in previous studies9,10,12 is equated with household ambulation (50ft [15.2m]), then several of the other studies8,13 listed in table 1, including the current study, need to interpret the outcome measure of walking function as household ambulation. This interpretation enables comparison of the current study with earlier literature and facilitates better appreciation of the relation of pinprick to household ambulation in individuals with AIS grade B SCI.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text