Elsevier

Obstetrics & Gynecology

Volume 88, Issue 2, August 1996, Pages 298-302
Obstetrics & Gynecology

Graduate education
Student doctors and women in labor: Attitudes and expectations*

https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(96)00191-3Get rights and content

Objective

To compare the attitudes and expectations that obstetric patients and medical students bring to the studentpatient relationship in intrapartum care.

Methods

Written questionnaires were distributed to obstetric patients who had students assist in their labor and delivery care and to medical students who had completed their clinical clerkship year. Responses of 222 patients and 67 students were analyzed for differences in expectations of student participation and assessment of skills.

Results

Responses of medical students and patients were significantly different in all attitudes and expectations studied. One hundred thirty-six (61%) patients compared with 27 (40%) students identified the patients' wish to contribute to the education of students as the most important reason for agreeing to student participation. All patients felt that student participation should be requested rather than assigned, with 194 (87%) patients but only 30 (45%) students wishing to have the student absent from the room at the time of the request. Mean ratings of different student skills tended to be higher from patients (1.3–1.8 on a seven-point Likert scale) than from the students themselves (range 1.6–2.4). Although students' expectations of participation in patient care were high, patients indicated expectations of fairly low levels of student involvement in communication, examination, labor support, and procedures.

Conclusion

Students have high expectations for their active involvement in intrapartum care and tend to underestimate the sense of altruism that motivates patients to allow student participation. Patients have low expectations of levels of student participation in their care, but are overall quite satisfied with the skills of the students. These differences highlight the need for the development of educational objectives that clarify student roles in clinical clerkships and the process of informed consent for student participation.

References (14)

  • WareJE et al.

    Behavioral consequences of consumer dissatisfaction with medical care

    Eval Program Plan

    (1983)
  • LarsenDE et al.

    Physician role performance and patient satisfaction

    Soc Sci Med

    (1976)
  • RoghmannKJ et al.

    Satisfaction with medical care, its measurement and relation to utilization

    Med Care

    (1979)
  • ClearlyPD et al.

    Patient assessment of hospital care

    Qual Rev Bull

    (1983)
  • FlemingGV

    Hospital structure and consumer satisfaction

    Health Serv Res

    (1981)
  • GlasserM et al.

    Patients' views of the medical education setting

    J Med Educ

    (1985)
  • ReichgottMJ et al.

    Acceptance by private patients of resident involvement in their outpatient care

    J Med Educ

    (1983)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (30)

  • To the Point: optimizing the learning environment in labor and delivery

    2023, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology MFM
  • No. 246-Pelvic Examinations by Medical Students

    2017, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
    Citation Excerpt :

    Patients have the right to refuse medical treat- ment and participation in medical teaching exercises. In fact, most patients are willing to participate in medical education5,11–15 but want to be informed of medical student involvement in their care.4,14,15 Physicians and students must be explicit about student participation during the consent process.16

  • Patient attitudes toward resident participation in cosmetic vs reconstructive outpatient consultations

    2015, Journal of Surgical Education
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although these trends may not carry over into other medical or surgical specialties, the important underlying point is that patients can be grouped into specific populations based on general characteristics that can be identified before any patient interaction, as done in our current study, and that based on these populations, assumptions can be made about their possible willingness to include medical trainees in their care. Regardless of patient predisposition to resident involvement, a 1996 study by Miller et al. reported that all patients believed trainee participation should be offered to the patient before resident inclusion rather than assumed to be acceptable by the attending physician.9 However, in this Miller study, once the request for inclusion was made, less than half of the patients preceded to decline student involvement.

  • Pelvic examinations by medical students

    2010, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
  • Pelvic Examinations by Medical Students

    2010, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
View all citing articles on Scopus
*

This work was supported by an Ortho-APGO Faculty Development Award 1990.

View full text