Experimental studyVentilation caused by external chest compression is unable to sustain effective gas exchange during CPR: a comparison with mechanical ventilation
References (13)
- et al.
Artificial respiration: comparison of manual maneuvers
Anesth Analg
(1936) - et al.
Artificial respiration: a new method and a comparative study of different methods in adults
J Am Med Assoc
(1950) - et al.
Critical survey of manual artificial respiration
J Am Med Assoc
(1951) - et al.
Air-flow patterns and pulmonary ventilation during manual artificial respiration on apneic normal adults II
J Appl Physiol
(1951) - et al.
Mouth-to-mouth versus manual artificial respiration for children and adults
J Am Med Assoc
(1958) - et al.
Comparison of methods for performing manual artificial respiration on apneic patients
J Appl Physiol
(1951)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (85)
Chest compressions during ventilation in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation cause fragmentation of the airflow
2021, American Journal of Emergency MedicineDo manual chest compressions provide substantial ventilation during prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation?
2021, American Journal of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :This mechanism was first reported in 1961 by Peter Safar, who observed that chest compressions generated an average tidal volume of 156 mL in curarised, intubated healthy subjects [8]. In animal models of cardiac arrest, manual chest compressions have been shown to generate limited alveolar ventilation [9-11]. In humans, measurements of ventilation generated by manual and mechanical chest compressions have only been performed after arrival of OHCA patients in the emergency department (ED).
Association of ventilation with outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
2019, Resuscitation
Copyright © 1994 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.